The neural computation of inconsistent choice behavior

Humans are often inconsistent (irrational) when choosing among simple bundles of goods, even without any particular changes to framing or context. However, the neural computations that give rise to such inconsistencies are still unknown. Similar to sensory perception and motor output, we propose that a substantial component of inconsistent behavior is due to variability in the neural computation of value. Here, we develop a novel index that measures the severity of inconsistency of each choice, enabling us to directly trace its neural correlates. We find that the BOLD signal in the vmPFC, ACC, and PCC is correlated with the severity of inconsistency on each trial and with the subjective value of the chosen alternative. This suggests that deviations from rational choice arise in the regions responsible for value computation. We offer a computational model of how variability in value computation is a source of inconsistent choices.Humans are often inconsistent when choosing between alternatives, but the neural basis of deviations from economic rationality is unclear. Here, the authors show that irrational choices arise in the same brain regions responsible for value computation, implying that brain ‘noise’ may underlie inconsistency.

[1]  M. Woodford Stochastic Choice: An Optimizing Neuroeconomic Model , 2014 .

[2]  S. N. Afriat,et al.  On a system of inequalities in demand analysis , 1973 .

[3]  A. Tversky Intransitivity of preferences. , 1969 .

[4]  Alexander Thiele,et al.  Attention-Induced Variance and Noise Correlation Reduction in Macaque V1 Is Mediated by NMDA Receptors , 2013, Neuron.

[5]  Faruk Gul A Theory of Disappointment Aversion , 1991 .

[6]  Todd A. Hare,et al.  Automatic versus Choice-Dependent Value Representations in the Human Brain , 2015, Neuron.

[7]  Dino J. Levy,et al.  The root of all value: a neural common currency for choice , 2012, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[8]  Mark Dean,et al.  Measuring Rationality with the Minimum Cost of Revealed Preference Violations , 2014 .

[9]  Jan Drugowitsch,et al.  Computational Precision of Mental Inference as Critical Source of Human Choice Suboptimality , 2016, Neuron.

[10]  W. Newsome,et al.  The Variable Discharge of Cortical Neurons: Implications for Connectivity, Computation, and Information Coding , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Agnieszka Tymula,et al.  The Reduction of Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex Gray Matter Volume Correlates with Loss of Economic Rationality in Aging , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Decision Making and Sequential Sampling from Memory , 2016, Neuron.

[13]  Todd A. Hare,et al.  A Common Mechanism Underlying Food Choice and Social Decisions , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[14]  Pietro Ortoleva,et al.  Stochastic Choice and Preferences for Randomization , 2015, Journal of Political Economy.

[15]  M. Grueschow,et al.  The precision of value-based choices depends causally on fronto-parietal phase coupling , 2015, Nature Communications.

[16]  Faruk Gul,et al.  Random Expected Utility , 2005 .

[17]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[18]  Paola Manzini,et al.  Sequentially Rationalizable Choice , 2007 .

[19]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  J. Daunizeau,et al.  Automatic integration of confidence in the brain valuation signal , 2015, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  SangMok Lee,et al.  The Money Pump as a Measure of Revealed Preference Violations , 2011, Journal of Political Economy.

[22]  M. Delgado,et al.  Toward a cumulative science of functional integration: A meta‐analysis of psychophysiological interactions , 2016, Human brain mapping.

[23]  B. Hayden,et al.  A distributed, hierarchical and recurrent framework for reward-based choice , 2017, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[24]  P. Samuelson Complementarity-An Essay on the 40th Anniversary of the Hicks-Allen Revolution in Demand Theory , 1974 .

[25]  F. Christian How the Brain Integrates Costs and Benefits During Decision Making , 2010 .

[26]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  THE VARIABILITY OF CENTRAL NEURAL ACTIVITY IN A SENSORY SYSTEM, AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE CENTRAL REFLECTION OF SENSORY EVENTS. , 1963, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  Ifat Levy,et al.  Neural Random Utility: Relating Cardinal Neural Observables to Stochastic Choice Behavior , 2019, Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics.

[28]  H. Varian The Nonparametric Approach to Demand Analysis , 1982 .

[29]  Miguel A. Ballester,et al.  Monotone Stochastic Choice Models: The Case of Risk and Time Preferences , 2015, Journal of Political Economy.

[31]  A. Faisal,et al.  Noise in the nervous system , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[32]  A. Grinvald,et al.  Dynamics of Ongoing Activity: Explanation of the Large Variability in Evoked Cortical Responses , 1996, Science.

[33]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[34]  Ryan Webb,et al.  The (Neural) Dynamics of Stochastic Choice , 2019, Manag. Sci..

[35]  S. Afriat THE CONSTRUCTION OF UTILITY FUNCTIONS FROM EXPENDITURE DATA , 1967 .

[36]  P. Tobler,et al.  Neural Signatures of Intransitive Preferences , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[37]  Frederick Mosteller,et al.  An Experimental Measurement of Utility , 1951, Journal of Political Economy.

[38]  M. Farah,et al.  Cerebral Cortex doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl176 The Role of Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex in Decision Making: Judgment under Uncertainty or Judgment Per Se? , 2007 .

[39]  H. Simon,et al.  Rational choice and the structure of the environment. , 1956, Psychological review.

[40]  C. Padoa-Schioppa Neuronal Origins of Choice Variability in Economic Decisions , 2013, Neuron.

[41]  Ifat Levy,et al.  Neural Random Utility : Relating Cardinal Neural Observables to Stochastic Choice Behaviour , 2019 .

[42]  A. Turken,et al.  The Neural Architecture of the Language Comprehension Network: Converging Evidence from Lesion and Connectivity Analyses , 2011, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[43]  J. Movshon,et al.  The statistical reliability of signals in single neurons in cat and monkey visual cortex , 1983, Vision Research.

[44]  Alexander S. Ecker,et al.  Attentional fluctuations induce shared variability in macaque primary visual cortex , 2017, bioRxiv.

[45]  R. A. Radford,et al.  The Economic Organisation of a P.O.W. Camp , 1945 .

[46]  A. Rangel,et al.  Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice. , 2010, Nature neuroscience.

[47]  T. Fukai,et al.  Neuronal stability in medial frontal cortex sets individual variability in decision-making , 2018, Nature Neuroscience.

[48]  B. Balas,et al.  Personal Familiarity Influences the Processing of Upright and Inverted Faces in Infants , 2009, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[49]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  The log-dynamic brain: how skewed distributions affect network operations , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[50]  J. Kable,et al.  Ventromedial Frontal Lobe Damage Disrupts Value Maximization in Humans , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[51]  M. Husain,et al.  Reward Pays the Cost of Noise Reduction in Motor and Cognitive Control , 2015, Current Biology.

[52]  Mark A. Straccia,et al.  Anterior Cingulate Engagement in a Foraging Context Reflects Choice Difficulty, Not Foraging Value , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[53]  Shachar Kariv,et al.  Individual Preferences for Giving , 2005 .

[54]  David W. Smith,et al.  Discrete Element Framework for Modelling Extracellular Matrix, Deformable Cells and Subcellular Components , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[55]  Syngjoo Choi,et al.  Consistency and heterogeneity of individual behavior under uncertainty , 2007 .

[56]  W. Martin Usrey,et al.  Attention Enhances Synaptic Efficacy and Signal-to-Noise in Neural Circuits , 2013, Nature.

[57]  Yoram Halevy,et al.  Parametric Recoverability of Preferences , 2018, Journal of Political Economy.

[58]  A. Rangel,et al.  Informatic parcellation of the network involved in the computation of subjective value. , 2014, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[59]  John D. Hey,et al.  Why We Should Not Be Silent About Noise , 2005, Experiments in Economics.

[60]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  GOODNESS-OF-FIT IN OPTIMIZING MODELS , 1989 .

[61]  John H. Miller,et al.  NOTES AND COMMENTS GIVING ACCORDING TO GARP: AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF THE CONSISTENCY OF PREFERENCES FOR ALTRUISM , 2002 .

[62]  Joseph W. Kable,et al.  The valuation system: a coordinate-based meta-analysis examining BOLD correlates of subjective value , 2013 .

[63]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[64]  Marco K. Wittmann,et al.  Multiple signals in anterior cingulate cortex , 2016, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[65]  P. Glimcher Indeterminacy in brain and behavior. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[66]  P. Samuelson A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer's Behaviour , 1938 .

[67]  H. Simon,et al.  Models of Bounded Rationality: Empirically Grounded Economic Reason , 1997 .

[68]  P. Lennie The Cost of Cortical Computation , 2003, Current Biology.

[69]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Intrinsic Fluctuations within Cortical Systems Account for Intertrial Variability in Human Behavior , 2007, Neuron.

[70]  C. Manski The structure of random utility models , 1977 .

[71]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Transformation of stimulus value signals into motor commands during simple choice , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[72]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Making smooth moves , 2022 .

[73]  Martin A. Lindquist,et al.  Detection of time-varying signals in event-related fMRI designs , 2008, NeuroImage.

[74]  J. Gold,et al.  Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.