Antarctic Clouds and Radiation within the NCAR Climate Models

To evaluate and improve the treatment of clouds and radiation by the climate models of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), simulations by the NCAR Community Climate Model version 3 (CCM3), as well as the recently released Community Atmosphere Model version 2 (CAM2), are examined. The Rasch and Kristjansson prognostic cloud condensate scheme, which is now the standard scheme for CAM2, is included in a version of CCM3 and evaluated. Furthermore, the Rapid Radiative Transfer Model (RRTM), which alleviates the deficit in downward clear-sky longwave radiation, is also included in a version of CCM3. The new radiation scheme in CAM2 also alleviates the clear-sky longwave bias, although RRTM is not included. The impact of the changes is especially large over the interior of Antarctica. The changes induced by the introduction of the prognostic cloud scheme are found to have a much larger impact on the CCM3 simulations than do those from the introduction of RRTM. The introduction of the prognostic cloud scheme increases cloud emissivity in the upper troposphere, reduces cloud emissivity in the lower troposphere, and results in a better vertical distribution of cloud radiative properties over interior Antarctica. The climate simulations have a very large cold bias in the stratosphere, especially during summer. There are significant deficiencies in the simulation of Antarctic cloud radiative effects. The optical thickness of Antarctic clouds appears to be excessive. This contributes to a warm bias in surface temperature during winter and a deficit in downward shortwave radiation during summer. Some biases for Antarctica are larger for CCM3 with the prognostic cloud condensate scheme than with the standard diagnostic clouds. When the mixing ratio threshold for autoconversion from suspended ice cloud to falling precipitation is reduced toward a more realistic value, the Antarctic clouds are thinned and some of the biases are reduced. To improve the surface energy balance, not only must the radiative effects of clouds be improved, it is also necessary to improve the representation of sensible heat flux. Insufficient vertical resolution of the frequently very shallow, very stable surface boundary layer apparently contributes to an excessive heat flux from the atmosphere to the surface during winter. The representations of Antarctic clouds and radiation by the new NCAR CAM2 are not clearly improved compared to those of the earlier CCM3. For example, the surface albedo over Antarctica is descreased in CAM2 and Community Climate System Model version 2 (CCSM2) simulations in comparison to CCM3 simulations, contributing to a summer warm bias in tropospheric temperature for the former.

[1]  W. Collins,et al.  Description of the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model (CAM 3.0) , 2004 .

[2]  J. Key,et al.  Antarctic Cloud Radiative Forcing at the Surface Estimated from the AVHRR Polar Pathfinder and ISCCP D1 Datasets, 1985-93 , 2003 .

[3]  James J. Hack,et al.  A modified formulation of fractional stratiform condensation rate in the NCAR Community Atmospheric Model (CAM2) , 2003 .

[4]  David P. Edwards,et al.  An updated parameterization for infrared emission and absorption by water vapor in the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Atmosphere Model , 2002 .

[5]  William D. Collins,et al.  Parameterization of Generalized Cloud Overlap for Radiative Calculations in General Circulation Models , 2001 .

[6]  Zong-ci Zhao,et al.  Climate models—evaluation , 2001 .

[7]  John C. King,et al.  Evaluation of Turbulent Surface Flux Parameterizations for the Stable Surface Layer over Halley, Antarctica* , 2001 .

[8]  J. Curry,et al.  Simulation of arctic low-level clouds observed during the FIRE Arctic Clouds Experiment using a new bulk microphysics scheme , 2001 .

[9]  Shepard A. Clough,et al.  Impact of an improved longwave radiation model, RRTM, on the energy budget and thermodynamic properties of the NCAR community climate model, CCM3 , 2000 .

[10]  Von P. Walden,et al.  Ground-Based Infrared Remote Sensing of Cloud Properties over the Antarctic Plateau. Part I: Cloud-Base Heights , 2001 .

[11]  S. Warren,et al.  Ground-Based Infrared Remote Sensing of Cloud Properties over the Antarctic Plateau. Part II: Cloud Optical Depths and Particle Sizes , 2001 .

[12]  J. Curry,et al.  Modeling clouds and radiation for the November 1997 period of SHEBA using a column climate model , 1999 .

[13]  J. Edwards,et al.  A new parameterization scheme for the optical properties of ice crystals for use in general circulation models of the atmosphere , 1999 .

[14]  A. Posadas,et al.  Seismic response of 3D topographical irregularities under incoming elastic waves from point sources , 1999 .

[15]  Philip J. Rasch,et al.  A Comparison of the CCM3 Model Climate Using Diagnosed and Predicted Condensate Parameterizations , 1998 .

[16]  James J. Hack,et al.  The Energy Budget of the NCAR Community Climate Model: CCM3* , 1998 .

[17]  James J. Hack,et al.  Response of Climate Simulation to a New Convective Parameterization in the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model (CCM3) , 1998 .

[18]  D. Bromwich,et al.  Polar Climate Simulation of the NCAR CCM3 , 1998 .

[19]  David H. Bromwich,et al.  Polar Radiation Budgets of the NCAR CCM3 , 1998 .

[20]  Dan Lubin,et al.  The Impact of Antarctic Cloud Radiative Properties on a GCM Climate Simulation , 1998 .

[21]  Judith A. Curry,et al.  Status of and outlook for large-scale modeling of atmosphere-ice-ocean interactions in the Arctic , 1998 .

[22]  E. Mlawer,et al.  Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmospheres: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave , 1997 .

[23]  J. Curry,et al.  Role of radiative transfer in the modeled mesoscale development of summertime arctic stratus , 1997 .

[24]  Von P. Walden,et al.  Radiosonde Temperature Measurements in Strong Inversions: Correction for Thermal Lag Based on an Experiment at the South Pole , 1997 .

[25]  Dan Lubin,et al.  Cloud Radiative Properties over the South Pole from AVHRR Infrared Data , 1996 .

[26]  Judith A. Curry,et al.  Overview of Arctic Cloud and Radiation Characteristics , 1996 .

[27]  B. Bonan,et al.  A Land Surface Model (LSM Version 1.0) for Ecological, Hydrological, and Atmospheric Studies: Technical Description and User's Guide , 1996 .

[28]  D. Bromwich,et al.  NCAR CCM2 simulation of the modern Antarctic climate , 1994 .

[29]  Robert S. Stone.  Properties of austral winter clouds derived from radiometric profiles at the South Pole , 1993 .

[30]  P. Anderson.  Evidence for an Antarctic winter coastal polynya , 1993, Antarctic Science.

[31]  D. Bromwich,et al.  Present-Day Antarctic Climatology Of the NCAR Community Climate Model Version 1 , 1993 .

[32]  J. Curry,et al.  A parameterization of ice cloud optical properties for climate models , 1992 .

[33]  J. King.  Some measurements of turbulence over an antarctic ice shelf , 1990 .

[34]  Airborne lidar observations of clouds in the Antarctic troposphere , 1989 .

[35]  A. Slingo.  A GCM Parameterization for the Shortwave Radiative Properties of Water Clouds , 1989 .

[36]  South Pole surface radiation balance measurements, April 1986 to February 1988 , 1989 .

[37]  S. Marshall.  a Physical Parameterization of Snow Albedo for Use in Climate Models. , 1989 .

[38]  David H. Bromwich,et al.  Snowfall in high southern latitudes , 1988 .

[39]  R. Chervin,et al.  Climatological Data for Clouds Over the Globe from Surface Observations , 1987 .

[40]  J. Hack,et al.  Description of the NCAR Community Climate Model (CCM1) , 1987 .

[41]  W. Schwerdtfeger,et al.  Weather and climate of the Antarctic , 1984 .

[42]  Vern N. Smiley,et al.  Lidar Determinations of Atmospheric Ice Crystal Layers at South Pole during Clear-Sky Precipitation , 1980 .

[43]  E. Kessler.  On the distribution and continuity of water substance in atmospheric circulations , 1969 .