Seismic communication signals in the blind mole-rat (Spalax ehrenbergi ): electrophysiological and behavioral evidence for their processing by the auditory system

Abstract Based on morphological and behavioral findings we suggest that the seismic vibratory signals that blind mole-rats (Spalax ehrenbergi) use for intraspecific communication are picked up from the substrate by bone conduction and processed by the auditory system. An alternative hypothesis, raised by others, suggest that these signals are processed by the somatosensory system. We show here that brain stem and middle latency responses evoked by vibrations are similar to those evoked by high-intensity airborne clicks but are larger in their amplitudes, especially when the lower jaw is in close contact with the vibrating substrate. Bilateral deafening of the mole-rat or high-intensity masking noise almost completely eliminated these responses. Deafening also gradually reduced head-drumming behavior until its complete elimination about 4–6 weeks after surgery. Successive vibrations, at a rate of 0.5 vibrations/s, elicited prominent responses. At rates higher than 2 vibrations/s the amplitude of the brain stem response did not change, yet the middle latency response disappeared almost completely. It is concluded that the seismic signals that mole rats use for long distance communication are indeed processed primarily by the auditory system.

[1]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Seismic Communication in Anuran AmphibiansWhite-lipped frogs thump the ground as they chirp , 1990 .

[2]  H. Scheich,et al.  Auditory pathway and auditory activation of primary visual targets in the blind mole rat (Spalax ehrenbergi): I. 2‐deoxyglucose study of subcortical centers , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[3]  E G Wever,et al.  Sound conduction in the dolphin ear. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  E. Nevo,et al.  Inner ear structure electrophysiological audiograms of the subterranean mole rat, Spalax ehrenbergi , 1988, Hearing Research.

[5]  V. Bruns,et al.  Sensory adaptations in subterranean mammals. , 1990, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[6]  E. Nevo,et al.  Seismic communication in the blind subterranean mole‐rat: patterns of head thumping and of their detection in the Spalax ehrenbergi superspecies in Israel , 1991 .

[7]  E. Nevo Adaptive Convergence and Divergence of Subterranean Mammals , 1979 .

[8]  R. R. Capranica,et al.  Vocal Repertoire of a Subterranean Rodent (Spalax) , 1974 .

[9]  Don L. Anderson,et al.  Velocity dispersion due to anelasticity; implications for seismology and mantle composition , 1976 .

[10]  J. Buchwald,et al.  Middle- and long-latency auditory evoked responses recorded from the vertex of normal and chronically lesioned cats , 1981, Brain Research.

[11]  Z. Wollberg,et al.  Are seismic communication signals transmitted by bone conduction in the blind mole rat? , 1989, Hearing Research.

[12]  E Nevo,et al.  Geographic dialects in blind mole rats: role of vocal communication in active speciation. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  G. Kenagy Field Observations of Male Fighting, Drumming, and Copulation in the Great Basin Kangaroo Rat, Dipodomys microps , 1976 .

[14]  E. Nevo OBSERVATIONS ON ISRAELI POPULATIONS OF THE MOLE RAT SPALAX E. EHRENBERGI NEHRING 1898 , 1961 .

[15]  E. Nevo,et al.  “Courtship” Call of Subterranean Mole Rats (Spalax ehrenbergi): Physical Analysis , 1988 .

[16]  J. Randall Discrimination of footdrumming signatures by kangaroo rats, Dipodomys spectabilis , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  R. L. Brill,et al.  BEHAVIORAL EVIDENCE FOR HEARING THROUGH THE LOWER JAW BY AN ECHOLOCATING DOLPHIN (TURSIOPS TRUNCATUS) , 1988 .

[18]  Peter M. Narins,et al.  Seismic communication in amphibians , 1994 .

[19]  Henry E. Heffner,et al.  Hearing and sound localization in blind mole rats (Spalax ehrenbergi) , 1992, Hearing Research.

[20]  E Nevo,et al.  Seismic communication in a blind subterranean mammal: a major somatosensory mechanism in adaptive evolution underground. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Joseph Terkel,et al.  Locomotor patterns, territory, and tunnel utilization in the mole‐rat Spalax ehrenbergi , 1996 .

[22]  N. Intrator,et al.  Seismic signalling as a means of communication in a subterranean mammal , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  J. Rotteveel Middle and long latency auditory evoked potentials , 1990 .

[24]  E. Nevo,et al.  Middle ear and cochlear receptors in the subterranean mole-rat, Spalax ehrenbergi , 1989, Hearing Research.

[25]  E. Lewis,et al.  The vertebrate ear as an exquisite seismic sensor. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  E. Nevo Speciation in subterranean mammals. , 1982, Progress in clinical and biological research.

[27]  Nigel C. Bennett,et al.  The Social Structure and Reproductive Biology of Colonies of the Mole-Rat, Cryptomys damarensis (Rodentia, Bathyergidae) , 1988 .