Implementation Strategies for E-Government: A Stakeholder Analysis Approach

This paper reports from a comprehensive study of e-government implementation in Ireland, conducted over the last two years. An in-depth case study is presented detailing the development of a dual strategy for implementation and provides a comparison of the results from this approach. The success and shortcomings of both approaches are identified, providing in-depth analysis into the identification and management of critical concerns in the implementation of citizen-centred e-government. Specifically, this paper highlights the importance of accounting for social and political features, unique to the public sector, which in this case have had a decisive impact on e-government implementation. Public sector organisations in particular present unique challenges to the implementation process and implementation strategies often require particular attention to the social and political elements inherent in organisational change. In e-government implementation, the main barriers are not technical but social and cultural. Implementation strategies should therefore support the process of managing stakeholder relations in order to reduce the risk of stakeholder conflict and ensure the success of e-government initiatives.

[1]  Calvin Meng Lai Chan,et al.  Managing Stakeholder Relationships in an E-Government Project , 2003, AMCIS.

[2]  Nigel P. Rea,et al.  Putting Citizens On-Line, Not in Line , 2001 .

[3]  L. Willcocks Managing information systems in UK public administration: Issues and prospects , 1994 .

[4]  E. P. Michael Strategy and the Internet. , 2001 .

[5]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  A strategic perspective of electronic democracy , 2001, CACM.

[6]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[7]  B Perrott Managing strategic issues in the public service , 1996 .

[8]  Hans Jochen Scholl,et al.  Applying stakeholder theory to e-government. , 2005 .

[9]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Walking atop the cliffs: avoiding failure and reducing risk in large scale e-government projects , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[10]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Symbolism and Information Systems Development: Myth, Metaphor and Magic , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  Frank Bannister,et al.  The virtual public servant: Ireland's public services broker , 2002, Inf. Polity.

[12]  Jan Weglarz,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[13]  Thomas R. Gulledge,et al.  Business process management: public sector implications , 2002, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[14]  Rob Kling,et al.  Value conflicts and social choice in electronic funds transfer system developments , 1978, CACM.

[15]  R. Brugha,et al.  A stakeholder analysis. , 2000, Health policy and planning.

[16]  Rob Kling,et al.  The control of information systems developments after implementation , 1984, CACM.

[17]  J. Steyaert,et al.  Governing in the information age , 2000 .

[18]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  IT Systems Implementation: Research Findings from the Public Sector , 1989, J. Inf. Technol..

[19]  Feng Li,et al.  Implementing E-Government Strategy in Scotland: Current Situation and Emerging Issues , 2003, J. Electron. Commer. Organ..

[20]  Richard Heeks Reinventing Government in the Information Age , 1999 .

[21]  Richard Heeks Reinventing Government in the Information Age: International Practice in IT-Enabled Public Sector Reform , 2002 .

[22]  Daniel J. Jorgensen,et al.  Facing the Challenges of E-Goverment: A Case Study of the City of Corpus Christi, Texas , 2002 .

[23]  Murray E. Jennex,et al.  STAKEHOLDER PROCESS APPROACH TOINFORMATION SYSTEMS EVALUATION , 2002 .

[24]  M. D. Myers,et al.  Dialectical hermeneutics: a theoretical framework for the implementation of information systems , 1995, Inf. Syst. J..

[25]  Timothy W. Nix,et al.  Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders , 1991 .

[26]  Daniel Robey,et al.  An investigation of user-led system design: rational and political perspectives , 1984, CACM.

[27]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Information systems failures—a survey and classification of the empirical literature , 1988 .

[28]  M. Venkatraman It-enabled business transformation: from automation to business scope redefinition , 1994 .

[29]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Determinants of Commitment to Information Systems Development: A Longitudinal Investigation , 1996, MIS Q..

[30]  Ramayya Krishnan,et al.  ServiceNet: An Agent-Based Framework for One-Stop E-Government Services , 2001 .

[31]  Paul C. Nutt,et al.  A Strategic Management Process for Public and Third-Sector Organizations , 1987 .

[32]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism , 1998, Inf. Syst. J..

[33]  Diana Burley Gant,et al.  WEB PORTALS AND THEIR ROLE IN E-GOVERNMENT , 2001 .

[34]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[35]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[36]  Chrisanthi Avgerou,et al.  The significance of context in information systems and organizational change , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[37]  Νικόλαος Β. Γεωργόπουλος,et al.  Information systems and organisational change , 1993 .