Neural processes underlying memory attribution on a reality-monitoring task.

A relatively common form of memory distortion arises when individuals must discriminate items they have seen from those they have imagined (reality monitoring). The present fMRI investigation (at 1.5 T) focused on the processes that relate to memory assignment regardless of accuracy (e.g. that correspond with the belief that an item was presented as a picture, regardless of whether that belief is correct). Prior to the scan, participants (n = 16) viewed concrete nouns and formed mental images of the object named. Half of the names were followed by the object's photo. During the scan, participants saw the object names and indicated whether the corresponding photo had been studied. Activity in visual-processing regions (including the precuneus and fusiform gyrus) corresponded with the attribution of an item to a pictorial presentation. In contrast, activity in regions thought to be important for self-referential processing (including the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and posterior cingulate gyrus) was associated with attribution to a nonpresented source. These neural findings converge with behavioral evidence indicating that individuals use the amount of different types of information retrieved (e.g. perceptual detail, information about cognitive operations) to determine whether an item was imagined or perceived.

[1]  R. Buckner,et al.  Functional Dissociation among Components of Remembering: Control, Perceived Oldness, and Content , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Elizabeth A. Kensinger,et al.  What Neural Correlates Underlie Successful Encoding and Retrieval? A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study Using a Divided Attention Paradigm , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  M. Johnson,et al.  Source monitoring and memory distortion. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[4]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  The Cognitive Neuroscience of Memory Distortion , 2004, Neuron.

[5]  Mary Ann Foley,et al.  Cognitive operations and decision bias in reality monitoring , 1981 .

[6]  Yoko Okado,et al.  Neural processing associated with true and false memory retrieval , 2003, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[7]  A M Dale,et al.  Optimal experimental design for event‐related fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[8]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  Emotional content and reality-monitoring ability: fMRI evidence for the influences of encoding processes , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  A. Canavan,et al.  Neural correlates of visuospatial imagery , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[10]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  See Blockindiscussions, Blockinstats, Blockinand Blockinauthor Blockinprofiles Blockinfor Blockinthis Blockinpublication Retrieving Blockinaccurate Blockinand Blockindistorted Blockinmemories: Neuroimaging Blockinevidence Blockinfor Blockineffects Blockinof Blockinemotion , 2022 .

[11]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Left prefrontal activation during episodic remembering: an event‐related fMRI study , 1998, Neuroreport.

[12]  E. Tulving,et al.  Reactivation of encoding-related brain activity during memory retrieval. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  C. N. Macrae,et al.  Finding the Self? An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  M. Raichle,et al.  Searching for a baseline: Functional imaging and the resting human brain , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Distributed Neural Systems for the Generation of Visual Images , 2000, Neuron.

[16]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  The consequences for memory of imagining in another person’s voice , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[17]  Beatriz Luna,et al.  Combining Brains: A Survey of Methods for Statistical Pooling of Information , 2002, NeuroImage.

[18]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Neuroimaging of cognitive functions in human parietal cortex , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[19]  M. Kendall Statistical Methods for Research Workers , 1937, Nature.

[20]  Benjamin J. Shannon,et al.  Functional-Anatomic Correlates of Memory Retrieval That Suggest Nontraditional Processing Roles for Multiple Distinct Regions within Posterior Parietal Cortex , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Daniel L. Schacter,et al.  False recognition in younger and older adults: Exploring the characteristics of illusory memories , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[22]  M. Greicius,et al.  Regional analysis of hippocampal activation during memory encoding and retrieval: fMRI study , 2003, Hippocampus.

[23]  J. Binder,et al.  A Parametric Manipulation of Factors Affecting Task-induced Deactivation in Functional Neuroimaging , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  G. Fink,et al.  Neural correlates of the first-person-perspective , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  Ken A Paller,et al.  Neural Evidence That Vivid Imagining Can Lead to False Remembering , 2004, Psychological science.

[26]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The Mind's Eye—Precuneus Activation in Memory-Related Imagery , 1995, NeuroImage.

[27]  S. M. Daselaar,et al.  When less means more: deactivations during encoding that predict subsequent memory , 2004, NeuroImage.

[28]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Evaluating characteristics of false memories: Remember/know judgments and memory characteristics questionnaire compared , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[29]  F. Bermpohl,et al.  Cortical midline structures and the self , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  D. Schacter,et al.  A sensory signature that distinguishes true from false memories , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  John W. Tukey,et al.  Statistical Methods for Research Workers , 1930, Nature.

[32]  Mark E Wheeler,et al.  Functional-anatomic correlates of remembering and knowing , 2004, NeuroImage.

[33]  Ken A. Paller,et al.  Neural events that underlie remembering something that never happened , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[34]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed neural systems for the generation of visual images , 2000, NeuroImage.

[35]  Marc Jeannerod,et al.  Modulating the experience of agency: a positron emission tomography study , 2003, NeuroImage.

[36]  L. Davachi,et al.  Behavioral/systems/cognitive Functional–neuroanatomic Correlates of Recollection: Implications for Models of Recognition Memory , 2022 .

[37]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Source monitoring. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[38]  Anthony B Waites,et al.  fMRI “deactivation” of the posterior cingulate during generalized spike and wave , 2003, NeuroImage.

[39]  Anthony D Wagner,et al.  Executive Control during Episodic Retrieval Multiple Prefrontal Processes Subserve Source Memory , 2002, Neuron.

[40]  Rugg Retrieval processes in human memory: Electrophysiological and fMRI evidence , 2004 .

[41]  G. Shulman,et al.  Medial prefrontal cortex and self-referential mental activity: Relation to a default mode of brain function , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  R. Markham,et al.  Imagery ability and source monitoring: implications for eyewitness memory. , 1993, British journal of psychology.

[43]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Fact and fantasy: The effects of internally generated events on the apparent frequency of externally generated events , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[44]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  Isolating the retrieval of imagined pictures during episodic memory: activation of the left precuneus and left prefrontal cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[45]  Martial Van der Linden,et al.  Self-referential reflective activity and its relationship with rest: a PET study , 2005, NeuroImage.

[46]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Reality Monitoring , 2005 .

[47]  Judgments of origin and generation effects: comparisons between young and elderly adults. , 1989 .

[48]  William Hirst,et al.  MEM: Memory Subsystems as Processes , 2019, Theories of Memory.

[49]  A. Wagner,et al.  Domain-general and domain-sensitive prefrontal mechanisms for recollecting events and detecting novelty. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.