Optimal Workloop Energetics of Muscle-Actuated Systems: An Impedance Matching View

Integrative approaches to studying the coupled dynamics of skeletal muscles with their loads while under neural control have focused largely on questions pertaining to the postural and dynamical stability of animals and humans. Prior studies have focused on how the central nervous system actively modulates muscle mechanical impedance to generate and stabilize motion and posture. However, the question of whether muscle impedance properties can be neurally modulated to create favorable mechanical energetics, particularly in the context of periodic tasks, remains open. Through muscle stiffness tuning, we hypothesize that a pair of antagonist muscles acting against a common load may produce significantly more power synergistically than individually when impedance matching conditions are met between muscle and load. Since neurally modulated muscle stiffness contributes to the coupled muscle-load stiffness, we further anticipate that power-optimal oscillation frequencies will occur at frequencies greater than the natural frequency of the load. These hypotheses were evaluated computationally by applying optimal control methods to a bilinear muscle model, and also evaluated through in vitro measurements on frog Plantaris longus muscles acting individually and in pairs upon a mass-spring-damper load. We find a 7-fold increase in mechanical power when antagonist muscles act synergistically compared to individually at a frequency higher than the load natural frequency. These observed behaviors are interpreted in the context of resonance tuning and the engineering notion of impedance matching. These findings suggest that the central nervous system can adopt strategies to harness inherent muscle impedance in relation to external loads to attain favorable mechanical energetics.

[1]  A. Biewener,et al.  Comparative power curves in bird flight , 2003, Nature.

[2]  John H. Long,et al.  The Importance of Body Stiffness in Undulatory Propulsion , 1996 .

[3]  R L Marsh,et al.  Activation patterns and length changes in hindlimb muscles of the bullfrog Rana catesbeiana during jumping. , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[4]  Lawrence F. Shampine,et al.  Solving Boundary Value Problems for Ordinary Differential Equations in M atlab with bvp 4 c , 2022 .

[5]  Richard A Satterlie,et al.  Neuromechanics: an integrative approach for understanding motor control. , 2007, Integrative and comparative biology.

[6]  Neville Hogan,et al.  The mechanics of multi-joint posture and movement control , 1985, Biological Cybernetics.

[7]  Jack M. Winters,et al.  Multiple Muscle Systems: Biomechanics and Movement Organization , 2011 .

[8]  E. Don Stevens,et al.  Effect of stimulus train duration and cycle frequency on the capacity to do work in the pectoral fin muscle of the pumpkinseed sunfish, Lepomis gibbosus , 1993 .

[9]  R. Josephson Mechanical Power output from Striated Muscle during Cyclic Contraction , 1985 .

[10]  Eric J Perreault,et al.  Voluntary control of static endpoint stiffness during force regulation tasks. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  T. Roberts The integrated function of muscles and tendons during locomotion. , 2002, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology.

[12]  Donald R. Smith Variational methods in optimization , 1974 .

[13]  Frans C. T. van der Helm,et al.  Resonance tuning in a neuro-musculo-skeletal model of the forearm , 2006, Biological Cybernetics.

[14]  M Bonnard,et al.  Autonomy versus forcing in the organization of human rhythmic forearm movements. , 1996, Comptes rendus de l'Academie des sciences. Serie III, Sciences de la vie.

[15]  T. Milner,et al.  Adaptive control of stiffness to stabilize hand position with large loads , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  L. Rome,et al.  Built for jumping: the design of the frog muscular system. , 1994, Science.

[17]  E D Stevens,et al.  The pattern of stimulation influences the amount of oscillatory work done by frog muscle. , 1996, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  W. Farahat,et al.  An apparatus for characterization and control of isolated muscle , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[19]  Thomas J Roberts,et al.  Mechanical power output during running accelerations in wild turkeys. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[20]  R. Marsh The Nature of the Problem: Muscles and Their Loads , 2022 .

[21]  E. D. Stevens Effect of pH and stimulus phase on work done by isolated frog sartorius muscle during cyclical contraction , 2005, Journal of Muscle Research & Cell Motility.

[22]  E. D. Stevens,et al.  A comparison between field habits and contractile performance of frog and toad sartorius muscle , 2004, Journal of comparative physiology.

[23]  R. Josephson Contraction dynamics and power output of skeletal muscle. , 1993, Annual review of physiology.

[24]  Full,et al.  Energy absorption during running by leg muscles in a cockroach , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[25]  Waleed A. Farahat Optimal workloop energetics of muscle-actuated systems , 2007 .

[26]  R. Full,et al.  A motor and a brake: two leg extensor muscles acting at the same joint manage energy differently in a running insect. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[27]  P. Crago Muscle input-output model: the static dependence of force on length, recruitment, and firing period , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  R L Marsh,et al.  Work and power output in the hindlimb muscles of Cuban tree frogs Osteopilus septentrionalis during jumping. , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[29]  A. Biewener,et al.  Dynamics of muscle function during locomotion: accommodating variable conditions. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[30]  Siemens Aktiengesellschaft,et al.  Electrical engineering handbook , 1969 .

[31]  D. J. Bennett Torques generated at the human elbow joint in response to constant position errors imposed during voluntary movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  George M. Siouris,et al.  Applied Optimal Control: Optimization, Estimation, and Control , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[33]  R J Full,et al.  How animals move: an integrative view. , 2000, Science.

[34]  D A Syme,et al.  Effect of cycle frequency and excursion amplitude on work done by rat diaphragm muscle. , 1989, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[35]  N. Hogan Adaptive control of mechanical impedance by coactivation of antagonist muscles , 1984 .

[36]  C. A. Pell,et al.  Mechanical control of swimming speed: stiffness and axial wave form in undulating fish models , 1995, The Journal of experimental biology.

[37]  Neville Hogan,et al.  On the stability of manipulators performing contact tasks , 1988, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[38]  M. Latash Virtual trajectories, joint stiffness, and changes in the limb natural frequency during single-joint oscillatory movements , 1992, Neuroscience.

[39]  A. G. Feldman Superposition of motor programs—I. Rhythmic forearm movements in man , 1980, Neuroscience.

[40]  Wai-Kai Chen,et al.  The Electrical Engineering Handbook , 2004 .

[41]  R. Pfeifer,et al.  Self-Organization, Embodiment, and Biologically Inspired Robotics , 2007, Science.

[42]  Norimasa Yamada,et al.  Modulation of elbow joint stiffness in a vertical plane during cyclic movement at lower or higher frequencies than natural frequency , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.