Prediction of the effects of preparation conditions on pervaporation performances of polydimethylsiloxane(PDMS)/ceramic composite membranes by backpropagation neural network and genetic algorithm

Abstract In this study, the preparation process of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)/ceramic composite membrane was successfully modeled by the hybrid models which employed backpropagation neural network (BPNN) to predict the effects of preparation conditions on pervaporation performances of membranes and used genetic algorithm (GA) to choose the initial connection weights and biases of BPNN. The PDMS concentration, crosslinking agent concentration and dip-coating time were taken as inputs, flux of ethanol and selectivity of ethanol/water were outputs, and trial-and-error method was used to determine the architectures of the hybrid models. Using these models, the detailed relationships between the preparation conditions and the membrane performances were established. Connection weight analyses show that each preparation condition almost has the same influence on the membrane flux and selectivity. Excellent agreements between the predictions of the hybrid models and the experiments validate that the hybrid models have sufficient accuracy. Furthermore, the results predicted by the hybrid models were compared with those predicted by the response surface methodology (RSM) models which were widely used in the optimization of nonlinear relationships. It is found that the standard deviations of both the training and the predicting data obtained by the hybrid models are much smaller than those by the RSM models. Hence, the hybrid models can be used to design the preparation conditions to obtain desired membrane performances in the preparation of pervaporation membranes.

[1]  Mohd Yusof Noordin,et al.  Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of thin film composite membrane , 2006 .

[2]  Juan Julián Merelo Guervós,et al.  G-Prop: Global optimization of multilayer perceptrons using GAs , 2000, Neurocomputing.

[3]  M. Deaton,et al.  Response Surfaces: Designs and Analyses , 1989 .

[4]  Klaus Hinkelmann,et al.  Design and Analysis of Experiment , 1975 .

[5]  Ugur Kesgin,et al.  Genetic algorithm and artificial neural network for engine optimisation of efficiency and NOx emission , 2004 .

[6]  Nidal Hilal,et al.  Rejection and modelling of sulphate and potassium salts by nanofiltration membranes: neural network and Spiegler–Kedem model , 2007 .

[7]  Guojun Zhang,et al.  Dynamically formed inner skin hollow fiber polydimethylsiloxane/polysulfone composite membrane for alcohol permselective pervaporation , 2010 .

[8]  Armando Blanco,et al.  A real-coded genetic algorithm for training recurrent neural networks , 2001, Neural Networks.

[9]  S. Chellam,et al.  Predicting membrane fouling during municipal drinking water nanofiltration using artificial neural networks , 2003 .

[10]  Wang Wei,et al.  Optimization of preparation conditions for polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)/ceramic composite pervaporation membranes using response surface methodology , 2008 .

[11]  Young-Don Ko,et al.  Modeling and optimization of the growth rate for ZnO thin films using neural networks and genetic algorithms , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[12]  Biswajit Sarkar,et al.  Prediction of permeate flux during electric field enhanced cross-flow ultrafiltration-A neural network approach , 2009 .

[13]  Tongwen Xu,et al.  Modelling of the adsorption of bovine serum albumin on porous polyethylene membrane by back-propagation artificial neural network , 2005 .

[14]  W. Richard Bowen,et al.  DYNAMIC ULTRAFILTRATION OF PROTEINS-A NEURAL NETWORK APPROACH , 1998 .

[15]  Jenny Ní Mhurchú,et al.  Dead-end filtration of yeast suspensions: Correlating specific resistance and flux data using artificial neural networks , 2006 .

[16]  Octavian Pastravanu,et al.  Neural network models for ultrafiltration and backwashing , 2000 .

[17]  Coskun Aydiner,et al.  Modeling of flux decline in crossflow microfiltration using neural networks: the case of phosphate removal , 2005 .

[18]  C. Chang,et al.  Preparation of multi-layer silicone/PVDF composite membranes for pervaporation of ethanol aqueous solutions , 2004 .

[19]  Hecht-Nielsen Theory of the backpropagation neural network , 1989 .

[20]  Shankararaman Chellam,et al.  Artificial neural network model for transient crossflow microfiltration of polydispersed suspensions , 2005 .

[21]  Eugeniusz Molga,et al.  Neural network approach to support modelling of chemical reactors: problems, resolutions, criteria of application , 2003 .

[22]  Ahmad Fauzi Ismail,et al.  Development of defect-free asymmetric polysulfone membranes for gas separation using response surface methodology , 2004 .

[23]  Qi-feng Liu,et al.  Prediction of microfiltration membrane fouling using artificial neural network models , 2009 .

[24]  Xiaogong Wang,et al.  Pervaporation separation of ethyl thioether/heptane mixtures by polyethylene glycol membranes , 2009 .

[25]  Zhiguo Su,et al.  Application of response surface methodology and central composite rotatable design in optimizing the preparation conditions of vinyltriethoxysilane modified silicalite/polydimethylsiloxane hybrid pervaporation membranes , 2010 .

[26]  A. R. Kurdian,et al.  Modeling and optimization of membrane fabrication using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm , 2010 .

[27]  N. Hilal,et al.  Artificial neural network simulation of combined humic substance coagulation and membrane filtration , 2008 .

[28]  Han-Qing Yu,et al.  Simulation of biological hydrogen production in a UASB reactor using neural network and genetic algorithm , 2007 .

[29]  Sung Soo Kim,et al.  PDMS–silica composite membranes with silane coupling for propylene separation , 2009 .

[30]  Wanqin Jin,et al.  Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)/Ceramic Composite Membrane with High Flux for Pervaporation of Ethanol−Water Mixtures , 2007 .

[31]  Jatinder N. D. Gupta,et al.  Comparative evaluation of genetic algorithm and backpropagation for training neural networks , 2000, Inf. Sci..

[32]  Qian Li,et al.  Optimization of injection molding process parameters using combination of artificial neural network and genetic algorithm method , 2007 .

[33]  César Hervás-Martínez,et al.  Approximating the sheep milk production curve through the use of artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms , 2005, Comput. Oper. Res..

[34]  Robert Y. M. Huang,et al.  Composite poly(vinyl alcohol)–poly(sulfone) membranes crosslinked by trimesoyl chloride: Characterization and dehydration of ethylene glycol–water mixtures , 2009 .

[35]  Xin-ping Wang Modified alginate composite membranes for the dehydration of acetic acid , 2000 .

[36]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[37]  Martin T. Hagan,et al.  Neural network design , 1995 .

[38]  Amir Abtahi,et al.  Neural network model for a commercial PEM fuel cell system , 2007 .