MAST Upgrade Divertor Facility: A Test Bed for Novel Divertor Solutions

The challenge of integrated exhaust consistent with the other requirements in DEMO and power plant class tokamaks (ITER-like and alternative DEMOs, Fusion Nuclear Science Facility approaches) is well-known and the exhaust solution is likely to be fundamental to the design and operating scenarios chosen. Strategies have been proposed such as high main plasma radiation, but improved solutions are sought and will require revised research methodologies. While no facility can address all the challenges, the new MAST Upgrade tokamak enables exploration of a wide range of divertor plasma aspects in a single device and their relation with the core plasma (e.g., access to H-mode) and in particular the development of fundamental understanding and new ideas. It has a unique combination of closed divertor, capability of a wide range of configurations from conventional to long leg (including Super-X), and fully symmetric double null (plasma and divertor structures). To extrapolate to DEMO and power plant scale devices where full integrated tests in advance are not feasible yet different physics mechanisms may dominate, theory-based models are likely to be essential for confident performance prediction, optimization, and a “qualification” of the concept. Development and validation of such models is at the heart of the program around MAST Upgrade. Amongst the many areas to be explored, there will be a strong focus on the closely coupled topics of plasma detachment and cross-field transport mechanisms (e.g., plasma filaments), key ingredients of effective and reliable protection of the plasma-facing components at DEMO scale.

[1]  F. Wagner A study of the perpendicular particle transport properties in the scrape-off layer of ASDEX , 1985 .

[2]  M. Mattei,et al.  A procedure for the design of snowflake magnetic configurations in tokamaks , 2014 .

[3]  F. Maviglia,et al.  DEMO exhaust challenges beyond ITER , 2015 .

[4]  Laila A. El-Guebaly,et al.  Fusion nuclear science facilities and pilot plants based on the spherical tokamak , 2016 .

[5]  Overview of recent physics results from MAST , 2016, 1611.06047.

[6]  T. Eich,et al.  Inter-ELM power decay length for JET and ASDEX upgrade: measurement and comparison with heuristic drift-based model. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[7]  D. Coster,et al.  Using SOLPS to confirm the importance of total flux expansion in Super-X divertors , 2017 .

[8]  Llion Evans Approaches for the Qualification of Exhaust Solutions for DEMO-class Devices , 2016 .

[9]  Y. Ogawa,et al.  “Multi-layer” one-dimensional model for stability analysis on partially detached divertor plasmas , 2011 .

[10]  G. Fishpool,et al.  MAST-upgrade divertor facility and assessing performance of long-legged divertors , 2013 .

[11]  A. Kirk,et al.  Quiescence near the X-point of MAST measured by high speed visible imaging , 2017, 1706.06318.

[12]  E. Surrey,et al.  Assessing Component Suitability and Optimizing Fusion Plant Design—Alternative Approaches to TRLs , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[13]  C. Fuchs,et al.  Integrated Data Analysis of Profile Diagnostics at ASDEX Upgrade , 2010 .

[14]  F. Militello,et al.  On the relation between non-exponential scrape off layer profiles and the dynamics of filaments , 2016, 1606.04262.

[15]  R. Goldston,et al.  A new scaling for divertor detachment , 2017 .

[16]  J. Contributors,et al.  High density operation for reactor-relevant power exhaust , 2015 .

[17]  M. Gadomska,et al.  Overview of EU DEMO design and R&D activities , 2014 .

[18]  D. N. Hill,et al.  Effect of changes in separatrix magnetic geometry on divertor behaviour in DIII-D , 2013 .

[19]  J. Harrison,et al.  Filamentary transport in the private flux region in MAST , 2015 .

[20]  Shahram Sarkani,et al.  A Comprehensive Review and Analysis of Maturity Assessment Approaches for Improved Decision Support to Achieve Efficient Defense Acquisition , 2009 .

[21]  R. Sharples,et al.  Coherence imaging of scrape-off-layer and divertor impurity flows in the Mega Amp Spherical Tokamak (invited). , 2014, The Review of scientific instruments.

[22]  F. Militello,et al.  Scrape off layer profiles interpreted with filament dynamics , 2016, 1604.08790.

[23]  Graham Naylor,et al.  MAST Upgrade – Construction Status , 2015 .

[24]  G. Matthews,et al.  Interpretation of scrape-off layer profile evolution and first-wall ion flux statistics on JET using a stochastic framework based on fillamentary motion , 2017, 1706.01239.

[25]  N. R. Walkden,et al.  L-mode filament characteristics on MAST as a function of plasma current measured using visible imaging , 2016, 1602.03021.

[26]  M. Umansky Attainment of a stable, fully detached plasma state in innovative divertor configurations. , 2016 .

[27]  Joseph A. Fernandez Contextual role of TRLs and MRLs in technology management. , 2010 .

[28]  J. P. Goedbloed,et al.  Generalized ballooning and sheath instabilities in the scrape-off layer of divertor tokamaks , 1997 .

[29]  Robert J. Goldston,et al.  Heuristic drift-based model of the power scrape-off width in low-gas-puff H-mode tokamaks , 2011 .

[30]  J. Schweinzer,et al.  Impurity seeding for tokamak power exhaust: from present devices via ITER to DEMO , 2013 .

[31]  M. Reinke Heat flux mitigation by impurity seeding in high-field tokamaks , 2017 .

[32]  C. Challis,et al.  MAST Accomplishments and Upgrade for Fusion Next-Steps , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[33]  T. Eich,et al.  Filament structures at the plasma edge on MAST , 2006 .

[34]  B. Lipschultz,et al.  Sensitivity of detachment extent to magnetic configuration and external parameters , 2016 .

[35]  Wayne Arter,et al.  A CAD-Based Tool for Calculating Power Deposition on Tokamak Plasma-Facing Components , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[36]  A. Kirk,et al.  L-mode and inter-ELM divertor particle and heat flux width scaling on MAST , 2013, 1306.6777.

[37]  V. Parail,et al.  Gyrokinetic projection of the divertor heat-flux width from present tokamaks to ITER , 2017, 1701.05507.

[38]  A. Loarte,et al.  Status and physics basis of the ITER divertor , 2009 .

[39]  Shuichi Takamura,et al.  Chapter 4: Power and particle control , 2007 .

[40]  P. J. Knight,et al.  Conceptual design of a component test facility based on the spherical tokamak , 2008 .

[41]  J. Contributors,et al.  Power exhaust by SOL and pedestal radiation at ASDEX Upgrade and JET , 2017 .

[42]  M. Wischmeier,et al.  SOLPS analysis of the MAST-U divertor with the effect of heating power and pumping on the access to detachment in the Super-x configuration , 2015 .

[43]  P. Valanju,et al.  Pedestal transport in H-mode plasmas for fusion gain , 2017 .

[44]  J. Harrison,et al.  The appearance and propagation of filaments in the private flux region in Mega Amp Spherical Tokamak , 2015 .