Mechanical properties and surface characteristics of three archwire alloys.

Recent developments in material science have presented newer archwire materials as well as improvements in the properties of existing ones. Proper selection and understanding of the biomechanical requirement of each case requires proper characterization studies on archwire alloys. The present study characterizes and compares three orthodontic archwire alloys, stainless steel, beta titanium alloy (TMA), and a newly introduced titanium alloy (TiMolium), for the parameters (1) ultimate tensile strength (UTS), 0.02% offset yield strength (YS), and modulus of elasticity (E); (2) load deflection characteristics; (3) frictional properties; (4) surface characteristics and (5) elemental analysis for TiMolium. Seven specimens of each archwire alloy were used for evaluating each parameter. An instron universal testing machine was used for tensile testing, three-point bend testing, and evaluation of frictional characteristics. Scanning electron microscope was used for surface evaluation and X-ray fluorescence for elemental analysis of TiMolium wire specimens. Stainless steel was the strongest archwire alloy with high UTS, E, 0.02% offset YS, and less friction at the archwire-bracket interface. TMA wires exhibited better load deflection characteristics with less stiffness than the other two wires. The surface of TMA appeared rough and exhibited very high values for friction at the archwire-bracket interface. TiMolium appeared to be an alpha-beta titanium alloy composed of titanium, aluminum, and vanadium and intermediate in nature for all the parameters evaluated.

[1]  S. Kapila,et al.  Mechanical properties and clinical applications of orthodontic wires. , 1989, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[2]  M. R. Sims,et al.  Tensile properties of orthodontic wire. , 1977, American journal of orthodontics.

[3]  R. Kusy A review of contemporary archwires: their properties and characteristics. , 2010, The Angle orthodontist.

[4]  R P Kusy,et al.  Surface roughness of orthodontic archwires via laser spectroscopy. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[5]  F Miura,et al.  The super-elastic property of the Japanese NiTi alloy wire for use in orthodontics. , 1986, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[6]  D C Tidy,et al.  Frictional forces in fixed appliances. , 1989, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[7]  C. Burstone Variable-modulus orthodontics. , 1981, American journal of orthodontics.

[8]  R. N. Moore,et al.  X-ray diffraction of nitinol orthodontic arch wires. , 1995, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[9]  A. J. Goldberg,et al.  Beta titanium: a new orthodontic alloy. , 1980, American journal of orthodontics.

[10]  C J Burstone,et al.  Maximum forces and deflections from orthodontic appliances. , 1983, American journal of orthodontics.