Perioperative margin detection in basal cell carcinoma using a deep learning framework: a feasibility study

Purpose Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the number of diagnosis is growing worldwide due to increased exposure to solar radiation and the aging population. Reduction of positive margin rates when removing BCC leads to fewer revision surgeries and consequently lower health care costs, improved cosmetic outcomes and better patient care. In this study, we propose the first use of a perioperative mass spectrometry technology (iKnife) along with a deep learning framework for detection of BCC signatures from tissue burns. Methods Resected surgical specimen were collected and inspected by a pathologist. With their guidance, data were collected by burning regions of the specimen labeled as BCC or normal, with the iKnife. Data included 190 scans of which 127 were normal and 63 were BCC. A data augmentation approach was proposed by modifying the location and intensity of the peaks of the original spectra, through noise addition in the time and frequency domains. A symmetric autoencoder was built by simultaneously optimizing the spectral reconstruction error and the classification accuracy. Using t-SNE, the latent space was visualized. Results The autoencoder achieved an accuracy (standard deviation) of 96.62 (1.35%) when classifying BCC and normal scans, a statistically significant improvement over the baseline state-of-the-art approach used in the literature. The t-SNE plot of the latent space distinctly showed the separability between BCC and normal data, not visible with the original data. Augmented data resulted in significant improvements to the classification accuracy of the baseline model. Conclusion We demonstrate the utility of a deep learning framework applied to mass spectrometry data for surgical margin detection. We apply the proposed framework to an application with light surgical overhead and high incidence, the removal of BCC. The learnt models can accurately separate BCC from normal tissue.

[1]  N. Agar,et al.  Tissue preparation for the in situ MALDI MS imaging of proteins, lipids, and small molecules at cellular resolution. , 2010, Methods in molecular biology.

[2]  Richard M. Caprioli,et al.  Unsupervised machine learning for exploratory data analysis in imaging mass spectrometry , 2019, Mass spectrometry reviews.

[3]  Luis Perez,et al.  The Effectiveness of Data Augmentation in Image Classification using Deep Learning , 2017, ArXiv.

[4]  Adel Hafiane,et al.  Application of chemometric algorithms to MALDI mass spectrometry imaging of pharmaceutical tablets. , 2015, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[5]  Francesca Rosini,et al.  The surgical intelligent knife distinguishes normal, borderline and malignant gynaecological tissues using rapid evaporative ionisation mass spectrometry (REIMS) , 2018, British Journal of Cancer.

[6]  A. Darzi,et al.  Intraoperative Tissue Identification Using Rapid Evaporative Ionization Mass Spectrometry , 2013, Science Translational Medicine.

[7]  Seema A Khan,et al.  Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  A. Darzi,et al.  Abstract 3977: iKnife: Rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry (REIMS) enables real-time chemical analysis of the mucosal lipidome for diagnostic and prognostic use in colorectal cancer , 2016 .

[9]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Visualizing Data using t-SNE , 2008 .

[10]  Christian Etmann,et al.  Deep learning for tumor classification in imaging mass spectrometry , 2017, Bioinform..

[11]  K. Veselkov,et al.  Analysis of intact bacteria using rapid evaporative ionisation mass spectrometry. , 2013, Chemical communications.

[12]  Brian W. Pogue,et al.  Addition of T2-guided optical tomography improves noncontrast breast magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis , 2017, Breast Cancer Research.

[13]  R. Dina,et al.  P74 Endometrial cancer: can the iKnife diagnose endometrial cancer? , 2019, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

[14]  Spencer A. Thomas,et al.  Dimensionality reduction of mass spectrometry imaging data using autoencoders , 2016, 2016 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI).

[15]  Eunyoung Kang,et al.  Factors Associated with Re-excision after Breast-Conserving Surgery for Early-Stage Breast Cancer , 2012, Journal of breast cancer.