A study of parametric calibration for low cost 3D printing: Seeking improvement in dimensional quality

Abstract Open source projects have helped extrusion-based Additive Manufacturing processes gain popularity in recent years. While they allow the design and development of low cost machines, one of the main difficulties users have found is the parametric calibration. A study was proposed to understand the best practices for the setup of “input parameters”, since in the open software chain there are many available for setup. Through experimental design methods, the dimensional accuracy of a cubic structure was analysed by varying factors such as: slicing software, layer thickness, infill density, first layer, infill and perimeter speeds, as well as extrusion temperature and multiplier. A Prusa I3 Hephestos printer and a Polylactic Acid (PLA) filament were used, and the parts were evaluated with contact measurement, 3D scanning and mass measurement procedures. Statistical analysis showed that the dimensional accuracy of the components was mostly affected by the infill density and the extrusion multiplier. Both parameters highlight the influence of the slicing software on the planning and quality of the models. Instabilities in the amount and flow of material, characterized by excess deposition, were responsible for the distortions along the three fundamental directions of the cubes.

[1]  Yan Wang,et al.  In situ monitoring of FDM machine condition via acoustic emission , 2015 .

[2]  M. Misra,et al.  Natural, Fibers, Biopolymers and Biocomposites , 2009 .

[3]  Caterina Casavola,et al.  Orthotropic mechanical properties of fused deposition modelling parts described by classical laminate theory , 2016 .

[4]  Liu Xinhua,et al.  An investigation on distortion of PLA thin-plate part in the FDM process , 2015 .

[5]  Luigi Maria Galantucci,et al.  Analysis of Dimensional Performance for a 3D Open-source Printer Based on Fused Deposition Modeling Technique☆ , 2015 .

[6]  Ian Gibson,et al.  Additive manufacturing technologies : 3D printing, rapid prototyping, and direct digital manufacturing , 2015 .

[7]  Scott A. Wilson,et al.  Low-Cost 3D Printers Enable High-Quality and Automated Sample Preparation and Molecular Detection , 2016, PloS one.

[8]  Alberto Boschetto,et al.  Accuracy prediction in fused deposition modeling , 2014 .

[9]  Omar Ahmed Mohamed,et al.  Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters for dimensional accuracy using I-optimality criterion , 2016 .

[10]  Qiang Huang,et al.  Shape deviation modeling for fused deposition modeling processes , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE).

[11]  Harry Bikas,et al.  Additive manufacturing methods and modelling approaches: a critical review , 2015, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[12]  Noshir A. Langrana,et al.  Structural quality of parts processed by fused deposition , 1996 .

[13]  A. K. Sood,et al.  Improving dimensional accuracy of Fused Deposition Modelling processed part using grey Taguchi method , 2009 .

[14]  Antonio Lanzotti,et al.  Understanding Process Parameter Effects of RepRap Open-Source Three-Dimensional Printers Through a Design of Experiments Approach , 2015 .

[15]  Nathaniel Hudson,et al.  Barriers to Using, Customizing, and Printing 3D Designs on Thingiverse , 2016, GROUP.

[16]  M. Sivadasan,et al.  Investigation on the Scale Factor applicable to ABS based FDM Additive Manufacturing , 2018 .

[17]  Siba Sankar Mahapatra,et al.  A Study on Dimensional Accuracy of Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Processed Parts using Fuzzy Logic , 2013 .

[18]  T. Nancharaiah,et al.  An experimental investigation on surface quality and dimensional accuracy of FDM components , 2010 .

[19]  A. F. Silva,et al.  Fused deposition modeling with polypropylene , 2015 .

[20]  Hakim Boudaoud,et al.  Towards a standard experimental protocol for open source additive manufacturing , 2014 .

[21]  Akhil Garg,et al.  Performance evaluation of warping characteristic of fused deposition modelling process , 2017 .

[22]  Brian N. Turner,et al.  A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: II. Materials, dimensional accuracy, and surface roughness , 2015 .

[23]  Filip Górski,et al.  Influence of process parameters on dimensional accuracy of parts manufactured using fused deposition modelling technology , 2013 .

[24]  P. Gruber,et al.  Polylactic Acid Technology , 2000 .

[25]  Keith M. Godfrey,et al.  Singaporean Mothers’ Perception of Their Three-year-old Child’s Weight Status: A Cross-Sectional Study , 2016, PloS one.