Importance of Spatial and Temporal Dynamics in Species Regional Abundance and Distribution

Several recent models have been proposed to explain the pattern of species distribution within a region. Brown's niche-based model, Levins' stochastic immigration- extinction model, and Hanski's core-satellite hypothesis (a modification of Levins' model) differ in relative spatial scales, and degree of stochastic variation in species distribution over time. To test the predictions of these models, we analyzed the regional distribution and temporal dynamics of plant species across 19 sites in tallgrass prairie over an 8-yr period. Spatial patterns of species regional distribution were bimodal each year, a pattern in accord with the core-satellite hypothesis. In addition, temporal patterns of species distribution within a site were also bimodal. The dynamics of the core-satellite hypothesis are driven by patterns of immigration and extinction. Extinction was positively related to richness, however, in contrast to the theory of island biogeography, immigration was not related to species richness. In addition, the variances in the differences in species frequencies from one year to the next were greater than three times the mean, a condition necessary for bimodality in the core-satellite model, for 88 of 135 (65.1%) species. These results provide strong support in favor of the core-satellite hypothesis and imply that stochastic factors may be the primary determinant of plant species dynamics and plant community structure in grasslands at the scale of several kilometres. Evidence from prairie communities at much larger spatial scales supported the patterns predicted by Brown's niche-based model. Thus, these apparently competing models are, in fact, compatible when viewed at the appropriate spatial scale.

[1]  W. Lauenroth,et al.  The structure and function of ten Western North American grasslands: I. Abiotic and vegetational characteristics , 1978 .

[2]  James H. Brown,et al.  Macroecology: The Division of Food and Space Among Species on Continents , 1989, Science.

[3]  Geoffrey M. Henebry,et al.  Inferring Process from Pattern in Natural CommunitiesCan we understand what we see , 1989 .

[4]  P. Risser The True Prairie ecosystem , 1981 .

[5]  R. Ricklefs,et al.  Community Diversity: Relative Roles of Local and Regional Processes , 1987, Science.

[6]  R M May,et al.  Niche overlap as a function of environmental variability. , 1972, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  R. Levins Some Demographic and Genetic Consequences of Environmental Heterogeneity for Biological Control , 1969 .

[8]  H. Gleason,et al.  The individualistic concept of the plant association , 1939 .

[9]  T. Fagerström,et al.  Limiting dissimilarity in plants: randomness prevents exclusion of species with similar competitive abilities , 1984 .

[10]  N. Gotelli,et al.  The Distribution and Abundance of Tallgrass Prairie Plants: A Test of the Core-Satellite Hypothesis , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[11]  R. P. McIntosh Raunkiaer's "Law of Frequency" , 1962 .

[12]  Deborah E. Goldberg,et al.  NEIGHBORHOOD COMPETITION IN AN OLD-FIELD PLANT COMMUNITY' , 1987 .

[13]  Rob Hengeveld,et al.  The distribution of abundance. I. Measurements , 1982 .

[14]  David J. Gibson,et al.  Effects of fire, topography and year-to-year climatic variation on species composition in tallgrass prairie , 1987, Vegetatio.

[15]  Robert H. Whittaker,et al.  Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains , 1956 .

[16]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Dynamics of regional distribution: the core and satellite species hypothesis , 1982 .

[17]  Stephen P. Ellner,et al.  Coexistence of plant species with similar niches , 1984, Vegetatio.

[18]  S. M. Glenn,et al.  Patch structure in tallgrass prairies: dynamics of satellite species. , 1990 .

[19]  T. F. H. Allen,et al.  The importance of scale in evaluating herbivory impacts , 1989 .

[20]  R. Ricklefs,et al.  Range Size and Local Abundance of Some North American Songbirds: A Positive Correlation , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[21]  C. Bock Distribution‐Abundance Relationships of Some Arizona Landbirds: A Matter of Scale? , 1987 .

[22]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[23]  John L. Harper,et al.  OCCUPATION OF BIOLOGICAL SPACE DURING SEEDLING ESTABLISHMENT , 1972 .

[24]  Samuel J. McNaughton,et al.  Dominance and the Niche in Ecological Systems , 1970 .

[25]  S. Collins Experimental analysis of patch dynamics and community heterogeneity in tallgrass prairie , 1989, Vegetatio.

[26]  C. B. Williams The application of the logarithmic series to the frequency of occurrence of plant species in quadrats , 1950 .

[27]  M. Burgman The Habitat Volumes of Scarce and Ubiquitous Plants: A Test of the Model of Environmental Control , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[28]  P. Yodzis,et al.  Introduction to Theoretical Ecology , 1989 .

[29]  L. Aarssen Ecological Combining Ability and Competitive Combining Ability in Plants: Toward a General Evolutionary Theory of Coexistence in Systems of Competition , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[30]  Richard Law,et al.  Large niche overlaps among coexisting plant species in a limestone grassland community , 1989 .

[31]  P. Werner Competition and Coexistence of Similar Species , 1979 .

[32]  R. F. Betz,et al.  SPECIES COMPOSITION OF OLD SETTLER SILT -LOAM PRAIRIES , 1989 .

[33]  James H. Brown On the Relationship between Abundance and Distribution of Species , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[34]  D. Tilman Competition, nutrient reduction and the competitive neighbourhood of a bunchgrass , 1989 .

[35]  S. M. Glenn,et al.  A Hierarchical Analysis of Species' Abundance Patterns in Grassland Vegetation , 1990, The American Naturalist.