The development of an information system typically requires debate between interested parties. In particular, debate between users is meant to define a common set of functional requirements. The applicability of this approach depends, however, on the willingness of participants to enter into such an open discussion. However, while holding differing, perhaps conflicting views, is seen as acceptable in Western cultures, in Eastern cultures more importance is placed on social consensus and aligning one’s views with that of the group. This paper reports on a case study that highlights the problems of using debate as an analysis tool in an Eastern culture, namely, Hong Kong. The case study involves the use of Soft Systems Methodology to guide a feasibility study for a marketing system within Hongkong Telecom. Three main problems were identified: 1) Group discussions were avoided; 2) Interviews were conducted in multiple languages; and, 3) High staff turnover made it difficult to develop and maintain mature stakeholder views. The study suggests that culturally sensitive development methods are needed to ensure culturally appropriate ways of developing an information system.
[1]
Paula M. C. Swatman,et al.
Identifying supply chain management and e-commerce opportunities at PaperCo Australia
,
2002
.
[2]
Sherif Kamel.
Managing Globally with Information Technology
,
2003
.
[3]
Yi-chen Lan.
A framework for an organization's transition to globalization: investigation of IT issues
,
2003
.
[4]
Mahmoud M. Watad.
The context of introducing IT/IS-based innovation into local government in Colombia
,
1999
.
[5]
J. Roberto Evaristo,et al.
The Management of Distributed Projects Across Cultures
,
2003,
J. Glob. Inf. Manag..
[6]
Felix B. Tan,et al.
Cases on Global IT Applications and Management: Successes and Pitfalls
,
2001
.