Applied coronary physiology for planning and guidance of percutaneous coronary interventions. A clinical consensus statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) of the European Society of Cardiology.

The clinical value of fractional flow reserve and non-hyperaemic pressure ratios are well established in determining an indication for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). In addition, over the last 5 years we have witnessed a shift towards the use of physiology to enhance procedural planning, assess post-PCI functional results, and guide PCI optimisation. In this regard, clinical studies have reported compelling data supporting the use of longitudinal vessel analysis, obtained with pressure guidewire pullbacks, to better understand how obstructive CAD contributes to myocardial ischaemia, to establish the likelihood of functionally successful PCI, to identify the presence and location of residual flow-limiting stenoses and to predict long-term outcomes. The introduction of new functional coronary angiography tools, which merge angiographic information with fluid dynamic equations to deliver information equivalent to intracoronary pressure measurements, are now available and potentially also applicable to these endeavours. Furthermore, the ability of longitudinal vessel analysis to predict the functional results of stenting has played an integral role in the evolving field of simulated PCI. Nevertheless, it is important to have an awareness of the value and challenges of physiology-guided PCI in specific clinical and anatomical contexts. The main aim of this European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions clinical consensus statement is to offer up-to-date evidence and expert opinion on the use of applied coronary physiology for procedural PCI planning, disease pattern recognition and post-PCI optimisation.

[1]  J. Escaned,et al.  Prediction of functional results of percutaneous coronary interventions with virtual stenting and quantitative flow ratio , 2022, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[2]  C. Berry,et al.  Differential Improvement in Angina and Health-Related Quality of Life After PCI in Focal and Diffuse Coronary Artery Disease. , 2022, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[3]  Takaharu Nakayoshi,et al.  Impact of Serial Coronary Stenoses on Various Coronary Physiologic Indices , 2022, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[4]  Shao-Liang Chen,et al.  Prognostic Implications of Fractional Flow Reserve After Coronary Stenting , 2022, JAMA network open.

[5]  E. Boersma,et al.  FFR-Guided PCI Optimization Directed by High-Definition IVUS Versus Standard of Care: The FFR REACT Trial. , 2022, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[6]  D. Andreini,et al.  Clinical Validation of a Virtual Planner for Coronary Interventions Based on Coronary CT Angiography. , 2022, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[7]  E. Barbato,et al.  Impact of Functional Severity of Coronary Artery Disease on Arterial Versus Venous Graft Patency. , 2022, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[8]  A. Candreva,et al.  Development, validation, and reproducibility of the pullback pressure gradient (PPG) derived from manual fractional flow reserve pullbacks , 2022, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[9]  E. Omerovic,et al.  5-Year Outcomes of PCI Guided by Measurement of Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Versus Fractional Flow Reserve. , 2022, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  I. Kardys,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Angiography-Based Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve (vFFR) Virtual Stenting , 2022, Journal of clinical medicine.

[11]  G. Mintz,et al.  Improved 3-Year Cardiac Survival After IVUS-Guided Long DES Implantation: A Patient-Level Analysis From 2 Randomized Trials. , 2022, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[12]  L. V. van Nunen,et al.  Single center experience in the treatment of hemodynamically significant diffuse coronary artery disease of the left anterior descending. , 2022, International journal of cardiology.

[13]  Yang Wang,et al.  Post-PCI outcomes predicted by pre-intervention simulation of residual quantitative flow ratio using augmented reality. , 2022, International journal of cardiology.

[14]  Manesh R. Patel,et al.  1-Year Outcomes of Blinded Physiological Assessment of Residual Ischemia After Successful PCI: DEFINE PCI Trial. , 2022, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[15]  A. Ágoston,et al.  Anatomical Assessment vs. Pullback REsting full-cycle rAtio (RFR) Measurement for Evaluation of Focal and Diffuse CoronarY Disease: Rationale and Design of the “READY Register” , 2021, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[16]  F. Ribichini,et al.  Impact of physiologically diffuse versus focal pattern of coronary disease on quantitative flow reserve diagnostic accuracy , 2021, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[17]  C. Lücke,et al.  Combined Coronary CT-Angiography and TAVR Planning for Ruling Out Significant Coronary Artery Disease , 2021, JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging.

[18]  P. Serruys,et al.  Five-year outcomes after state-of-the-art percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with de novo three-vessel disease: final results of the SYNTAX II study , 2021, European heart journal.

[19]  A. van Rossum,et al.  Residual Quantitative Flow Ratio to Estimate Post‐Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve , 2021, Journal of interventional cardiology.

[20]  A. Lefieux,et al.  Physiological Distribution and Local Severity of Coronary Artery Disease and Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. , 2021, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[21]  A. M. Leone,et al.  No blossom for fractional flow reserve in FLOWER-MI. , 2021, European heart journal.

[22]  J. Granada,et al.  Thin-cap fibroatheroma predicts clinical events in diabetic patients with normal fractional flow reserve: the COMBINE OCT-FFR trial. , 2021, European heart journal.

[23]  C. Berry,et al.  Post-stenting fractional flow reserve vs coronary angiography for optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (TARGET-FFR) , 2021, European heart journal.

[24]  D. Perera,et al.  Hyperemic hemodynamic characteristics of serial coronary lesions assessed by pullback pressure gradients , 2021, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[25]  Pawel Kleczynski,et al.  El cociente de flujo cuantitativo en pacientes con estenosis aórtica grave y lesiones coronarias intermedias , 2021, Revista Española de Cardiología.

[26]  B. Uretsky,et al.  Angio-Based Fractional Flow Reserve, Functional Pattern of Coronary Artery Disease, and Prediction of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Result: a Proof-of-Concept Study , 2021, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy.

[27]  A. Jeremias,et al.  Invasive Coronary Physiology After Stent Implantation: Another Step Toward Precision Medicine. , 2021, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[28]  C. Terkelsen,et al.  Performance of quantitative flow ratio in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation , 2021, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[29]  J. Escaned,et al.  Comparisons of Nonhyperemic Pressure Ratios: Predicting Functional Results of Coronary Revascularization Using Longitudinal Vessel Interrogation. , 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[30]  S. Tu,et al.  Clinical implication of QFR in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after drug-eluting stent implantation , 2020, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[31]  A. Lefieux,et al.  Automated Algorithm Using Pre-Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve Pullback Curve to Predict Post-Intervention Physiological Results. , 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[32]  K. Choi,et al.  Prognostic Implications of Post-Intervention Resting Pd/Pa and Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Stent Implantation. , 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[33]  K. Gould,et al.  Coronary Microcirculation in Aortic Stenosis: Pathophysiology, Invasive Assessment, and Future Directions , 2020, Journal of interventional cardiology.

[34]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Non-obstructive high-risk plaques increase the risk of future culprit lesions comparable to obstructive plaques without high-risk features: the ICONIC study. , 2020, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[35]  H. Fujita,et al.  Utility of angiography–physiology coregistration maps during percutaneous coronary intervention in clinical practice , 2020, Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.

[36]  Z. Ali,et al.  Accuracy of Computational Pressure-Fluid Dynamics applied to Coronary Angiography to Derive Fractional Flow Reserve - FLASH FFR. , 2020, Cardiovascular research.

[37]  H. Nishina,et al.  Inter-observer differences in interpretation of coronary pressure-wire pullback data by non-expert interventional cardiologists , 2020, Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.

[38]  H. Nishina,et al.  Safety of Revascularization Deferral of Left Main Stenosis Based on Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Evaluation. , 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[39]  J. Davies,et al.  Difference in functional assessment of individual stenosis severity in serial coronary lesions between resting and hyperemic pressure-wire pullback: Insights from the GIFT registry. , 2020, International journal of cardiology.

[40]  T. Akasaka,et al.  The inter-study reproducibility of instantaneous wave-free ratio and angiography coregistration. , 2020, Journal of cardiology.

[41]  F. Neumann,et al.  The Natural History of Nonculprit Lesions in STEMI: An FFR Substudy of the Compare-Acute Trial. , 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[42]  F. Crea,et al.  Fractional Flow Reserve-Based Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Current Evidence and Future Directions. , 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[43]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. , 2019, European heart journal.

[44]  G. Mintz,et al.  Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: 5-Year Follow-Up of the IVUS-XPL Randomized Trial. , 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[45]  A. M. Leone,et al.  Fractional Flow Reserve or Optical Coherence Tomography to Guide Management of Angiographically Intermediate Coronary Stenosis: A Single-Center Trial. , 2020, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[46]  O. Muller,et al.  Quantitative flow ratio virtual stenting and post stenting correlations to post stenting fractional flow reserve measurements from the DOCTORS (Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimize Results of Stenting) study population , 2019, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[47]  Manesh R. Patel,et al.  Blinded Physiological Assessment of Residual Ischemia After Successful Angiographic Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The DEFINE PCI Study. , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[48]  G. Campo,et al.  Prognostic Value of QFR Measured Immediately After Successful Stent Implantation: The International Multicenter Prospective HAWKEYE Study. , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[49]  J. Reiber,et al.  Clinical Implication of Quantitative Flow Ratio After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for 3-Vessel Disease. , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[50]  B. Uretsky,et al.  Incremental Prognostic Value of Post-Intervention Pd/Pa in Patients Undergoing Ischemia-Driven Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[51]  E. Barbato,et al.  Measurement of Hyperemic Pullback Pressure Gradients to Characterize Patterns of Coronary Atherosclerosis. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[52]  B. Gersh,et al.  Non-atherosclerotic causes of acute coronary syndromes , 2019, Nature Reviews Cardiology.

[53]  M. Okubo,et al.  Feasibility and safety of jailed‐pressure wire technique using durable optical fiber pressure wire for intervention of coronary bifurcation lesions , 2019, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[54]  D. Glineur,et al.  Impact of preoperative fractional flow reserve on arterial bypass graft anastomotic function: the IMPAG trial. , 2019, European heart journal.

[55]  J. Davies,et al.  Temporal Changes in Coronary Hyperemic and Resting Hemodynamic Indices in Nonculprit Vessels of Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. , 2019, JAMA cardiology.

[56]  Patricia V. Lawford,et al.  Virtual Coronary Intervention , 2019, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[57]  E. Barbato,et al.  Association of Improvement in Fractional Flow Reserve With Outcomes, Including Symptomatic Relief, After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2019, JAMA cardiology.

[58]  A. M. Leone,et al.  Fractional flow reserve in acute coronary syndromes and in stable ischemic heart disease: clinical implications. , 2019, International journal of cardiology.

[59]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, Fractional Flow Reserve, and Perfusion Imaging for Ischemia Diagnosis. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[60]  C. Macaya,et al.  Safety of intermediate left main stenosis revascularization deferral based on fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound: A systematic review and meta-regression including 908 deferred left main stenosis from 12 studies. , 2018, International journal of cardiology.

[61]  D. Andreini,et al.  Coronary computed tomography angiography for heart team decision-making in multivessel coronary artery disease , 2018, European heart journal.

[62]  P. Serruys,et al.  Coronary Hemodynamics in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , 2018, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[63]  N. Tanaka,et al.  Prognostic Implications of Relative Increase and Final Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Stent Implantation. , 2018, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[64]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Clinical use of intracoronary imaging. Part 1: guidance and optimization of coronary interventions. An expert consensus document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions , 2018, European heart journal.

[65]  Volkmar Falk,et al.  2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. , 2018, European heart journal.

[66]  D. Andreini,et al.  Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From Computed Tomographic Angiography in Patients With Multivessel CAD. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[67]  C. Indolfi,et al.  Pre-Angioplasty Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Pullback Predicts Hemodynamic Outcome In Humans With Coronary Artery Disease: Primary Results of the International Multicenter iFR GRADIENT Registry. , 2018, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[68]  S. Kische,et al.  Impact of Routine Invasive Physiology at Time of Angiography in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease on Reclassification of Revascularization Strategy: Results From the DEFINE REAL Study. , 2018, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[69]  Z. Ali,et al.  Comparison of Different Diastolic Resting Indexes to iFR: Are They All Equal? , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[70]  Shengshou Hu,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Angiography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio Measurements for Online Assessment of Coronary Stenosis. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[71]  C. Terkelsen,et al.  Nonculprit Stenosis Evaluation Using Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[72]  M. Nazzaro,et al.  Instantaneous wave‐free ratio and fractional flow reserve for the assessment of nonculprit lesions during the index procedure in patients with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction: The WAVE study , 2017, American heart journal.

[73]  O. Demir,et al.  Impact of Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement on Procedural Management and Clinical Outcomes: The REPEAT-FFR Study. , 2017, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[74]  P. Serruys,et al.  Clinical outcomes of state-of-the-art percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with de novo three vessel disease: 1-year results of the SYNTAX II study , 2017, European heart journal.

[75]  Jun-Jie Zhang,et al.  Cutoff Value and Long-Term Prediction of Clinical Events by FFR Measured Immediately After Implantation of a Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: 1- to 3-Year Results From the DKCRUSH VII Registry Study. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[76]  G. Cheon,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Resting and Hyperemic Invasive Physiological Indices to Define Myocardial Ischemia: Validation With 13N-Ammonia Positron Emission Tomography. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[77]  J. Davies,et al.  Effect of Coronary Anatomy and Hydrostatic Pressure on Intracoronary Indices of Stenosis Severity. , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[78]  Filippo Cademartiri,et al.  Left Anterior Descending Artery Myocardial Bridging: A Clinical Approach. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[79]  H. Fujita,et al.  Visualization of the improvement of myocardial perfusion after coronary intervention using motorized fractional flow reserve pullback curve , 2016, Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.

[80]  H. Takashima,et al.  Impact of lesion characteristics on the prediction of optimal poststent fractional flow reserve. , 2016, American heart journal.

[81]  G. Mintz,et al.  Effects of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: Meta-Analysis With Individual Patient-Level Data From 2,345 Randomized Patients. , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[82]  T. Akasaka,et al.  Impact of functional focal versus diffuse coronary artery disease on bypass graft patency. , 2016, International journal of cardiology.

[83]  B. Uretsky,et al.  Clinical and prognostic value of poststenting fractional flow reserve in acute coronary syndromes , 2016, Heart.

[84]  B. Uretsky,et al.  Utilizing Post-Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve to Optimize Acute Results and the Relationship to Long-Term Outcomes. , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[85]  P. Stella,et al.  Deferral vs. performance of percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally non-significant coronary stenosis: 15-year follow-up of the DEFER trial. , 2015, European heart journal.

[86]  William Wijns,et al.  Optical coherence tomography imaging during percutaneous coronary intervention impacts physician decision-making: ILUMIEN I study , 2015, European heart journal.

[87]  G. Stone,et al.  Randomized Comparison of FFR-Guided and Angiography-Guided Provisional Stenting of True Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: The DKCRUSH-VI Trial (Double Kissing Crush Versus Provisional Stenting Technique for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcation Lesions VI). , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[88]  J. Mayet,et al.  The Instantaneous wave-Free Ratio (iFR) pullback: a novel innovation using baseline physiology to optimise coronary angioplasty in tandem lesions. , 2015, Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions.

[89]  B. De Bruyne,et al.  The impact of downstream coronary stenosis on fractional flow reserve assessment of intermediate left main coronary artery disease: human validation. , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[90]  A. Hughes,et al.  Pre-angioplasty instantaneous wave-free ratio pullback provides virtual intervention and predicts hemodynamic outcome for serial lesions and diffuse coronary artery disease. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[91]  B. Prendergast,et al.  Impact of microvascular obstruction on the assessment of coronary flow reserve, index of microcirculatory resistance, and fractional flow reserve after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[92]  Hongjian Zhu,et al.  Prognostic value of fractional flow reserve: linking physiologic severity to clinical outcomes. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[93]  H. Fujita,et al.  Relationship between fractional flow reserve and residual plaque volume and clinical outcomes after optimal drug-eluting stent implantation: insight from intravascular ultrasound volumetric analysis. , 2014, International journal of cardiology.

[94]  B. Uretsky,et al.  Rebuttal: Response to letter by fan and colleagues regarding “impact on fractional flow reserve of donor artery by chronic total obstruction revascularization” , 2013, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[95]  H. Matsuo,et al.  Physiological impact of CTO recanalization assessed by coronary pressure measurement: A case report , 2013, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[96]  Hae-Young Lee,et al.  Clinical and physiological outcomes of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with serial stenoses within one coronary artery. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[97]  U. Siebert,et al.  Fractional flow reserve in unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction experience from the FAME (Fractional flow reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[98]  B. Koo,et al.  Relation of fractional flow reserve after drug-eluting stent implantation to one-year outcomes. , 2011, American Journal of Cardiology.

[99]  B. Uretsky,et al.  The effect of CTO recanalization on FFR of the donor artery , 2011, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[100]  William Wijns,et al.  Fractional flow reserve for the assessment of nonculprit coronary artery stenoses in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[101]  U. Siebert,et al.  Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[102]  Alexandre C Pereira,et al.  Impact of number of vessels disease on outcome of patients with stable coronary artery disease: 5-year follow-up of the Medical, Angioplasty, and bypass Surgery study (MASS). , 2008, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[103]  Young‐Bae Park,et al.  Physiologic assessment of jailed side branch lesions using fractional flow reserve. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[104]  A König,et al.  Fractional flow reserve for the prediction of cardiac events after coronary stent implantation: results of a multivariate analysis , 2005, Heart.

[105]  J. Koolen,et al.  Value of fractional flow reserve in making decisions about bypass surgery for equivocal left main coronary artery disease , 2001, Heart.

[106]  J. Andreasen,et al.  Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiographically-Guided Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting , 2018 .

[107]  B. De Bruyne,et al.  Clinical value of post–percutaneous coronary intervention fractional flow reserve value: A systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2017, American heart journal.

[108]  Hyun-Jae Kang,et al.  A novel noninvasive technology for treatment planning using virtual coronary stenting and computed tomography-derived computed fractional flow reserve. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[109]  Y. Kihara,et al.  A pitfall of fractional flow reserve associated with the presence of collateral circulation. , 2011, Internal medicine.

[110]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.