Analyzing latent state-trait and multiple-indicator latent growth curve models as multilevel structural equation models

Latent state-trait (LST) and latent growth curve (LGC) models are frequently used in the analysis of longitudinal data. Although it is well-known that standard single-indicator LGC models can be analyzed within either the structural equation modeling (SEM) or multilevel (ML; hierarchical linear modeling) frameworks, few researchers realize that LST and multivariate LGC models, which use multiple indicators at each time point, can also be specified as ML models. In the present paper, we demonstrate that using the ML-SEM rather than the SL-SEM framework to estimate the parameters of these models can be practical when the study involves (1) a large number of time points, (2) individually-varying times of observation, (3) unequally spaced time intervals, and/or (4) incomplete data. Despite the practical advantages of the ML-SEM approach under these circumstances, there are also some limitations that researchers should consider. We present an application to an ecological momentary assessment study (N = 158 youths with an average of 23.49 observations of positive mood per person) using the software Mplus (Muthén and Muthén, 1998–2012) and discuss advantages and disadvantages of using the ML-SEM approach to estimate the parameters of LST and multiple-indicator LGC models.

[1]  Michael C Neale,et al.  People are variables too: multilevel structural equations modeling. , 2005, Psychological methods.

[2]  S. Shiffman,et al.  20. Ecological Momentary Assessment , 2013 .

[3]  M. Eid,et al.  Structural equation modeling of multitrait-multimethod data: different models for different types of methods. , 2008, Psychological methods.

[4]  K. Schermelleh-Engel,et al.  Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures. , 2003 .

[5]  R. Steyer,et al.  States and traits in psychological assessment. , 1992 .

[6]  J J McArdle,et al.  Latent growth curves within developmental structural equation models. , 1987, Child development.

[7]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Happiness in Everyday Life: The Uses of Experience Sampling , 2003 .

[8]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Application of Hierarchical Linear Models to Assessing Change , 1987 .

[9]  Timothy J. Robinson,et al.  Multilevel Analysis: Techniques and Applications , 2002 .

[10]  W. Meredith.  Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance , 1993 .

[11]  E. Ferrer,et al.  Factorial Invariance and The Specification of Second-Order Latent Growth Models. , 2008, Methodology : European journal of research methods for the behavioral & social sciences.

[12]  Theodore A. Walls,et al.  An Introduction to Latent Variable Growth Curve Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications (2nd ed.) , 2007 .

[13]  S G West,et al.  Putting the individual back into individual growth curves. , 2000, Psychological methods.

[14]  Michael Eid,et al.  A CTC(M−1) Model for Different Types of Raters , 2009 .

[15]  M. Eid,et al.  Do you feel better or worse? The validity of perceived deviations of mood states from mood traits , 1999 .

[16]  Terry E. Duncan,et al.  An Introduction to Latent Variable Growth Curve Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Application, Second Edition , 1999 .

[17]  Roel Bosker,et al.  Multilevel analysis : an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling , 1999 .

[18]  J. Mcardle.  Dynamic but Structural Equation Modeling of Repeated Measures Data , 1988 .

[19]  William Meredith,et al.  Latent curve analysis , 1990 .

[20]  Gregory R. Hancock,et al.  An Illustration of Second-Order Latent Growth Models , 2001 .

[21]  B. Muthén,et al.  Multilevel Covariance Structure Analysis , 1994 .

[22]  Linda M. Collins,et al.  New methods for the analysis of change , 2001 .

[23]  Jan de Leeuw,et al.  Introducing Multilevel Modeling , 1998 .

[24]  A. McNeil,et al.  Latent Curve Models: A Structural Equation Approach , 2007 .

[25]  Bengt Muthén,et al.  Latent Variable Analysis: Growth Mixture Modeling and Related Techniques for Longitudinal Data , 2004 .

[26]  Ulrich Frank,et al.  Multilevel Modeling , 2014, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[27]  Michael Eid,et al.  Latent state–trait theory and research in personality and individual differences , 1999 .

[28]  Ginger Lockhart,et al.  A comparison of four approaches to account for method effects in latent state-trait analyses. , 2012, Psychological methods.

[29]  G. A. Marcoulides,et al.  Multilevel Analysis Techniques and Applications , 2002 .

[30]  Craig K. Enders,et al.  Applied Missing Data Analysis , 2010 .

[31]  Walter L. Leite.  A Comparison of Latent Growth Models for Constructs Measured by Multiple Items , 2007 .

[32]  Jelte M. Wicherts,et al.  Solving the 432 pieces of the puzzle called measurement invariance [Review of: R.E. Millsap (2011) Statistical approaches to measurement invariance] , 2011 .

[33]  A Zautra,et al.  The trait-state-error model for multiwave data. , 1995, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[34]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[35]  I. Plewis.  Modelling Behaviour with Multivariate Multilevel Growth Curves , 2005 .

[36]  Craig K Enders,et al.  Missing not at random models for latent growth curve analyses. , 2011, Psychological methods.

[37]  P. Young,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1972, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[38]  Rolf Steyer,et al.  Latent state-trait models. , 2012 .

[39]  David A Cole,et al.  Empirical and conceptual problems with longitudinal trait-state models: introducing a trait-state-occasion model. , 2005, Psychological methods.

[40]  Jerry L. Grenard,et al.  Sweetened drink and snacking cues in adolescents. A study using ecological momentary assessment , 2013, Appetite.

[41]  S. Reise,et al.  Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain. , 1997 .

[42]  Ulman Lindenberger,et al.  The effect of multiple indicators on the power to detect inter-individual differences in change. , 2010, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[43]  S. Shiffman,et al.  Ecological momentary assessment. , 2008, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[44]  Ginger Lockhart,et al.  First- Versus Second-Order Latent Growth Curve Models: Some Insights From Latent State-Trait Theory , 2013, Structural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal.