Multistage and Mixture Parallel Gatekeeping Procedures in Clinical Trials

Gatekeeping procedures have been developed to solve multiplicity problems arising in clinical trials with hierarchical objectives where the null hypotheses that address these objectives are grouped into ordered families. A general method for constructing multistage parallel gatekeeping procedures was proposed by Dmitrienko et al. (2008). The objective of this paper is to study two related classes of parallel gatekeeping procedures. Restricting to two-family hypothesis testing problems, we first use the mixture method developed in Dmitrienko and Tamhane (2011) to define a class of parallel gatekeeping procedures derived using the closure principle that can be more powerful than multistage gatekeeping procedures. Second, we show that power of multistage gatekeeping procedures can also be improved by using α-exhaustive tests for the component procedures. Extensions of these results for multiple families are stated. Illustrative examples from clinical trials are given.

[1]  Isaac Dialsingh,et al.  Multiple testing problems in pharmaceutical statistics , 2011 .

[2]  S. Sarkar,et al.  The Simes Method for Multiple Hypothesis Testing with Positively Dependent Test Statistics , 1997 .

[3]  G. Hommel.  A stagewise rejective multiple test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni test , 1988 .

[4]  Y. Hochberg.  A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance , 1988 .

[5]  H. Keselman,et al.  Multiple Comparison Procedures , 2005 .

[6]  Russell D. Wolfinger,et al.  Multiple Comparisons and Multiple Tests Using the SAS System , 1999 .

[7]  K. Gabriel,et al.  On closed testing procedures with special reference to ordered analysis of variance , 1976 .

[8]  Alex Dmitrienko,et al.  A Mixture Gatekeeping Procedure Based on the Hommel Test for Clinical Trial Applications , 2011, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[9]  S. Holm.  A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[10]  Olivier Guilbaud,et al.  Bonferroni Parallel Gatekeeping – Transparent Generalizations, Adjusted P ‐values, and Short Direct Proofs , 2007, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[11]  Alex Dmitrienko,et al.  Gatekeeping Procedures in Clinical Trials , 2009 .

[12]  G. Molenberghs,et al.  Analysis of clinical trial data using SAS: A practical guide , 2005 .

[13]  W. Brannath,et al.  A graphical approach to sequentially rejective multiple test procedures , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  Alex Dmitrienko,et al.  Analysis of Clinical Trials Using SAS: A Practical Guide , 2005 .

[15]  Xin Wang,et al.  Stepwise Gatekeeping Procedures in Clinical Trial Applications , 2006, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[16]  Gonzalo Durán Pacheco,et al.  Multiple Testing Problems in Pharmaceutical Statistics , 2009 .

[17]  A. Tamhane,et al.  Multiple Comparison Procedures , 1989 .

[18]  O. Guilbaud,et al.  A recycling framework for the construction of Bonferroni‐based multiple tests , 2009, Statistics in medicine.

[19]  V. Durkalski.  Analysis of Clinical Trials Using SAS®: A Practical Guide , 2006 .

[20]  K. Gabriel,et al.  SIMULTANEOUS TEST PROCEDURES-SOME THEORY OF MULTIPLE COMPARISONS' , 1969 .

[21]  S. Sarkar.  Some probability inequalities for ordered $\rm MTP\sb 2$ random variables: a proof of the Simes conjecture , 1998 .

[22]  P. Westfall,et al.  Gatekeeping strategies for clinical trials that do not require all primary effects to be significant , 2003, Statistics in medicine.

[23]  Yosef Hochberg,et al.  Closed procedures are better and often admit a shortcut , 1999 .

[24]  Alex Dmitrienko,et al.  General Multistage Gatekeeping Procedures , 2008, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[25]  Alex Dmitrienko,et al.  Mixtures of multiple testing procedures for gatekeeping applications in clinical trials , 2011, Statistics in medicine.