Spatial distribution of the active surveillance of sheep scrapie in Great Britain: an exploratory analysis

BackgroundThis paper explores the spatial distribution of sampling within the active surveillance of sheep scrapie in Great Britain. We investigated the geographic distribution of the birth holdings of sheep sampled for scrapie during 2002 – 2005, including samples taken in abattoir surveys (c. 83,100) and from sheep that died in the field ("fallen stock", c. 14,600). We mapped the birth holdings by county and calculated the sampling rate, defined as the proportion of the holdings in each county sampled by the surveys. The Moran index was used to estimate the global spatial autocorrelation across Great Britain. The contributions of each county to the global Moran index were analysed by a local indicator of spatial autocorrelation (LISA).ResultsThe sampling rate differed among counties in both surveys, which affected the distribution of detected cases of scrapie. Within each survey, the county sampling rates in different years were positively correlated during 2002–2005, with the abattoir survey being more strongly autocorrelated through time than the fallen stock survey. In the abattoir survey, spatial indices indicated that sampling rates in neighbouring counties tended to be similar, with few significant contrasts. Sampling rates were strongly correlated with sheep density, being highest in Wales, Southwest England and Northern England. This relationship with sheep density accounted for over 80% of the variation in sampling rate among counties. In the fallen stock survey, sampling rates in neighbouring counties tended to be different, with more statistically significant contrasts. The fallen stock survey also included a larger proportion of holdings providing many samples.ConclusionSampling will continue to be uneven unless action is taken to make it more uniform, if more uniform sampling becomes a target. Alternatively, analyses of scrapie occurrence in these datasets can take account of the distribution of sampling. Combining the surveys only partially reduces uneven sampling. Adjusting the distribution of sampling between abattoirs to reduce the bias in favour of regions with high sheep densities could probably achieve more even sampling. However, any adjustment of sampling should take account of the current understanding of the distribution of scrapie cases, which will be improved by further analysis of this dataset.

[1]  S. Gubbins,et al.  Prevalence of scrapie in sheep in Great Britain estimated from abattoir surveys during 2002 and 2003 , 2005, Veterinary Record.

[2]  S. Groseclose,et al.  Evaluating Public Health Surveillance , 2010 .

[3]  M. Charlton,et al.  Quantitative geography : perspectives on spatial data analysis by , 2001 .

[4]  S. Gubbins,et al.  Flock-level risk factors for scrapie in Great Britain: analysis of a 2002 anonymous postal survey , 2006, BMC veterinary research.

[5]  Richard E. Zartman,et al.  Exploring spatial dependence of cotton yield using global and local autocorrelation statistics , 2004 .

[6]  D. Dorling.  Area Cartograms: Their Use and Creation , 2011 .

[7]  E. Morignat,et al.  Estimates of the prevalence of transmissible spongiform encephalopathies in sheep and goats in France in 2002 , 2006, Veterinary Record.

[8]  M. Monmonier.  How to Lie with Maps , 1991 .

[9]  Gennady L. Andrienko,et al.  Exploratory analysis of spatial and temporal data - a systematic approach , 2005 .

[10]  P. Moran.  Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. , 1950, Biometrika.

[11]  L. Amelin,et al.  Local Indicators of Spatial Association-LISA , 1995 .

[12]  S. Gubbins,et al.  No temporal trends in the prevalence of atypical scrapie in British sheep, 2002–2006 , 2008, BMC veterinary research.

[13]  L. Anselin.  Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA , 2010 .

[14]  D. Pfeiffer,et al.  Analysis of data from the passive surveillance of scrapie in Great Britain between 1993 and 2002 , 2006, Veterinary Record.

[15]  K. Marshall,et al.  An evaluation of scrapie surveillance in the United States. , 2007, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[16]  Luc Anselin,et al.  Computing environments for spatial data analysis , 2000, J. Geogr. Syst..

[17]  V. J. Del Rio Vilas,et al.  Prevalence of scrapie in sheep: results from fallen stock surveys in Great Britain in 2002 and 2003 , 2005, Veterinary Record.

[18]  James A. Dougenik,et al.  AN ALGORITHM TO CONSTRUCT CONTINUOUS AREA CARTOGRAMS , 1985 .

[19]  V. J. Del Rio Vilas,et al.  Explaining the heterogeneous scrapie surveillance figures across Europe: a meta-regression approach , 2007, BMC veterinary research.

[20]  W. Tobler.  A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region , 1970 .

[21]  Catherine Plaisant,et al.  The challenge of information visualization evaluation , 2004, AVI.

[22]  Christian Ducrot,et al.  How the surveillance system may bias the results of analytical epidemiological studies on BSE: prevalence among dairy versus beef suckler cattle breeds in France. , 2003, Veterinary research.

[23]  A. McLean,et al.  Scrapie transmission in Britain: a recipe for a mathematical model , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  S. Gubbins,et al.  Descriptive analysis of the results of an anonymous postal survey of the occurrence of scrapie in Great Britain in 2002 , 2006, Veterinary Record.

[25]  Rowland R. Kao,et al.  Demographic risk factors for classical and atypical scrapie in Great Britain , 2007, The Journal of general virology.

[26]  P. Durr,et al.  How best to geo-reference farms? A case study from Cornwall, England. , 2002, Preventive veterinary medicine.

[27]  A. McLean,et al.  Descriptive epidemiology of scrapie in Great Britain: results of a postal survey , 2000, Veterinary Record.

[28]  Lisa M. Lee,et al.  Principles & Practice of Public Health Surveillance , 2010 .