A human factors analysis of proactive support in human-robot teaming

It has long been assumed that for effective human-robot teaming, it is desirable for assistive robots to infer the goals and intents of the humans, and take proactive actions to help them achieve their goals. However, there has not been any systematic evaluation of the accuracy of this claim. On the face of it, there are several ways a proactive robot assistant can in fact reduce the effectiveness of teaming. For example, it can increase the cognitive load of the human teammate by performing actions that are unanticipated by the human. In such cases, even though the teaming performance could be improved, it is unclear whether humans are willing to adapt to robot actions or are able to adapt in a timely manner. Furthermore, misinterpretations and delays in goal and intent recognition due to partial observations and limited communication can also reduce the performance. In this paper, our aim is to perform an analysis of human factors on the effectiveness of such proactive support in human-robot teaming. We perform our evaluation in a simulated Urban Search and Rescue (USAR) task, in which the efficacy of teaming is not only dependent on individual performance but also on teammates' interactions with each other. In this task, the human teammate is remotely controlling a robot while working with an intelligent robot teammate `Mary'. Our main result shows that the subjects generally preferred Mary with the ability to provide proactive support (compared to Mary without this ability). Our results also show that human cognitive load was increased with a proactive assistant (albeit not significantly) even though the subjects appeared to interact with it less.

[1]  Brian Charles Williams,et al.  Concurrent Plan Recognition and Execution for Human-Robot Teams , 2014, ICAPS.

[2]  A. Gerevini,et al.  Plan Constraints and Preferences in PDDL 3 The Language of the Fifth International Planning Competition , 2005 .

[3]  Nicola Muscettola,et al.  Model-based executive control through reactive planning for autonomous rovers , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[4]  Henry A. Kautz,et al.  Reasoning about plans , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.

[5]  Ho Chit Siu,et al.  Comparative Performance of Human and Mobile Robotic Assistants in Collaborative Fetch-and-Deliver Tasks , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[6]  Alessandro Saffiotti,et al.  Human-aware task planning for mobile robots , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Advanced Robotics.

[7]  Derek Long,et al.  Plan Constraints and Preferences in PDDL3 , 2006 .

[8]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Improved human-robot team performance using Chaski, A human-inspired plan execution system , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[9]  Lars Karlsson,et al.  Grandpa Hates Robots - Interaction Constraints for Planning in Inhabited Environments , 2014, AAAI.

[10]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Planning for serendipity , 2015, 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[11]  Henry A. Kautz,et al.  Generalized Plan Recognition , 1986, AAAI.

[12]  Rachid Alami,et al.  A Human Aware Mobile Robot Motion Planner , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[13]  Alessandro Saffiotti,et al.  Too cool for school - adding social constraints in human aware planning , 2014 .

[14]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Cost-Based Anticipatory Action Selection for Human–Robot Fluency , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[15]  Rachid Alami,et al.  Planning and Plan-execution for Human-Robot Cooperative Task achievement , 2009, ICAPS 2009.

[16]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Effects of anticipatory action on human-robot teamwork: Efficiency, fluency, and perception of team , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[17]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  The Peer-to-Peer Human-Robot Interaction Project , 2005 .

[18]  Craig A. Knoblock,et al.  PDDL-the planning domain definition language , 1998 .

[19]  Hector Geffner,et al.  Probabilistic Plan Recognition Using Off-the-Shelf Classical Planners , 2010, AAAI.

[20]  Robert P. Goldman,et al.  A Bayesian Model of Plan Recognition , 1993, Artif. Intell..

[21]  Matthias Scheutz,et al.  Coordination in human-robot teams using mental modeling and plan recognition , 2014, 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[22]  Maria Fox,et al.  PDDL2.1: An Extension to PDDL for Expressing Temporal Planning Domains , 2003, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[23]  Alessandro Saffiotti,et al.  Development of a Socially Believable Multi-Robot Solution from Town to Home , 2014, Cognitive Computation.

[24]  R Parasuraman,et al.  Designing automation for human use: empirical studies and quantitative models , 2000, Ergonomics.

[25]  Rina Dechter,et al.  Temporal Constraint Networks , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[26]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Automated Planning for Peer-to-peer Teaming and its Evaluation in Remote Human-Robot Interaction , 2015, HRI.