Evaluation of wear of selected prosthetic materials in contact with enamel and dentin.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM The proper choice of prosthetic materials for restoration of occlusal surfaces is important for the protection of the hard tissue of the opposing teeth and for regular functioning of the stomatognathic system. PURPOSE This study evaluated the resistance to wear of gold, Palliag M, Dentacolor, Chromasit, and Stellon materials and the enamel and dentin of natural teeth during functional contacts in an artificial oral environment with and without an abrasion material (Al2 O3 ). MATERIAL AND METHODS The 5 nonceramic prosthetic materials used in the restoration of occlusal surfaces of fixed partial dentures were examined in contact with enamel and dentin during a simulated masticatory process in 2 environments (with and without abrasion). Wear was evaluated by means of a special device designed for wear examination. RESULTS The findings highlighted that the wear of nonceramic prosthetic materials in contact with enamel or dentin was similar. Dentin showed greater wear when in contact with these materials than with the enamel surface. CONCLUSION Artificial environmental factors significantly influenced the wear of the hard tissue of teeth, especially when in contact with materials having low microhardness.

[1]  S. M. de De Micheli,et al.  Electrochemical study of corrosion in Ni-Cr dental alloys. , 1982, Biomaterials.

[2]  S. N. Salama,et al.  X-ray study and microhardness data of some dental enamel species. , 1989, Biomaterials.

[3]  R. M. Matveevsky,et al.  Wear Resistance and Microhardness of Human Teeth , 1991, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[4]  R. I. Holland Galvanic currents between gold and amalgam. , 1980, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[5]  H BEYRON,et al.  OCCLUSAL RELATIONS AND MASTICATION IN AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINES. , 1964, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[6]  D. Ouellet,et al.  Restoring the worn dentition. , 1992, Journal of esthetic dentistry.

[7]  S. Rosenstiel,et al.  Abrasion of Human Enamel by Different Dental Ceramics in vitro , 1991, Journal of dental research.

[8]  K. Kawai,et al.  Three-body wear of light-activated composite veneering materials. , 1995, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[9]  R. Omar,et al.  Identification and management of tooth wear. , 1994, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[10]  F. Barbakow,et al.  Chewing Pressure us. Wear of Composites and Opposing Enamel Cusps , 1992, Journal of dental research.

[11]  C. Tylenda,et al.  A New Approach to the Study of Tooth Wear , 1991, Journal of dental research.

[12]  I. Krejci,et al.  Effect of Contact Area Size on Enamel and Composite Wear , 1992, Journal of dental research.

[13]  D C Jagger,et al.  An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of selected restorative materials on dentine. , 1995, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[14]  W. Douglas,et al.  In vitro study of the wear characteristics of natural and artificial teeth. , 1985, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[15]  B. W. Pavone Bruxism and its effect on the natural teeth. , 1985, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[16]  G. Carlsson,et al.  Occlusal wear of teeth and restorative materials. A review of classification, etiology, mechanisms of wear, and some aspects of restorative procedures. , 1993, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[17]  R. A. Aziz,et al.  Wear of materials used in dentistry: a review of the literature. , 1990, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[18]  A. Ekfeldt,et al.  Occlusal contact wear of prosthodontic materials. An in vivo study. , 1988, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[19]  A. Harrison,et al.  The wear effects of selected composites on restorative materials and enamel. , 1987, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[20]  T FUSAYAMA,et al.  Corrosion of Gold and Amalgam Placed in Contact with Each other , 1963, Journal of dental research.