Point estimate methods based on Taylor Series Expansion – The perturbance moments method – A more coherent derivation of the second order statistical moment

Abstract Point estimate methods (PEMs) have found their niche in application to geotechnical problems and a few other engineering fields, where their relative simplicity matches well with the need for quick and reliable estimates of the uncertainty in model results. In some cases, however, the simplicity of the PEMs has to come to terms with the physical meaning of the stochastic variables and with the non-linearity of the model function. In this study, a general review of PEMs is presented and an improved method is proposed that requires fewer model evaluations, but still provides meaningful results for non-linear problems. Two uncertainty analyses of the hydrologic response to a rainfall event are presented: for a small synthetic basin and for a small mountain basin in Italy. The results of three PEMs are evaluated – Rosenblueth’s method, Li’s method, and the proposed perturbance moments method (PMM), along with the computationally-intensive, Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) approach. It is shown that for the same computational requirements, the derivation of the PMM is more coherent and resolves the problem of the negative variance which can occur when using other PEMs derived from the Taylor Series Expansion. The method is also computationally efficient, both compared to MCS and to other PEMs.

[1]  A. Bolle How to Manage the Spatial Variability of Natural Soils , 1994 .

[2]  Andrea Rinaldo,et al.  On the impact of rainfall patterns on the hydrologic response , 2008 .

[3]  K. S. Li,et al.  New point estimate method for water resources modeling , 1993 .

[4]  K. S. Li Point-Estimate Method for Calculating Statistical Moments , 1992 .

[5]  A. C. Miller,et al.  Discrete Approximations of Probability Distributions , 1983 .

[6]  M. Harr Probabilistic estimates for multivariate analyses , 1989 .

[7]  J. Christian,et al.  POINT-ESTIMATE METHOD AS NUMERICAL QUADRATURE , 2001 .

[8]  J C Refsgaard,et al.  An integrated methodology for recording uncertainties about environmental data. , 2005, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[9]  Samuela Franceschini,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF UNCERTAINTY SOURCES IN WATER QUALITY MODELING IN THE NIAGARA RIVER , 2010 .

[10]  H. Hong An efficient point estimate method for probabilistic analysis , 1998 .

[11]  Christina W. Tsai,et al.  Evaluation of Probabilistic Point Estimate Methods in Uncertainty Analysis for Environmental Engineering Applications , 2005 .

[12]  Enrico Bertuzzo,et al.  Transport at basin scales: 1. Theoretical framework , 2005 .

[13]  G. Hornberger,et al.  Empirical equations for some soil hydraulic properties , 1978 .

[14]  J. Christian,et al.  The point‐estimate method with large numbers of variables , 2002 .

[15]  Milton E. Harr,et al.  Reliability-Based Design in Civil Engineering , 1987 .

[16]  Christina W. Tsai,et al.  Incorporating Reliability into the Definition of the Margin of Safety in Total Maximum Daily Load Calculations , 2008 .

[17]  W. Green,et al.  Studies on Soil Phyics. , 1911, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[18]  E. Rosenblueth Point estimates for probability moments. , 1975, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Transport at basin scales: 2. Applications , 2005 .

[20]  Keith Beven,et al.  CHANGING RESPONSES IN HYDROLOGY : ASSESSING THE UNCERTAINTY IN PHYSICALLY BASED MODEL PREDICTIONS , 1991 .

[21]  Andrea Rinaldo,et al.  GEOMORPHOLOGICAL THEORY OF THE HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE , 1996 .