The effects of cross-generational and cross-dialectal variation on vowel identification and classification.

Cross-generational and cross-dialectal variation in vowels among speakers of American English was examined in terms of vowel identification by listeners and vowel classification using pattern recognition. Listeners from Western North Carolina and Southeastern Wisconsin identified 12 vowel categories produced by 120 speakers stratified by age (old adults, young adults, and children), gender, and dialect. The vowels /ɝ, o, ʊ, u/ were well identified by both groups of listeners. The majority of confusions were for the front /i, ɪ, e, ɛ, æ/, the low back /ɑ, ɔ/ and the monophthongal North Carolina /aɪ/. For selected vowels, generational differences in acoustic vowel characteristics were perceptually salient, suggesting listeners' responsiveness to sound change. Female exemplars and native-dialect variants produced higher identification rates. Linear discriminant analyses which examined dialect and generational classification accuracy showed that sampling the formant pattern at vowel midpoint only is insufficient to separate the vowels. Two sample points near onset and offset provided enough information for successful classification. The models trained on one dialect classified the vowels from the other dialect with much lower accuracy. The results strongly support the importance of dynamic information in accurate classification of cross-generational and cross-dialectal variations.

[1]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Marcos Dipinto,et al.  Discriminant analysis , 2020, Predictive Analytics.

[3]  Paul Foulkes,et al.  The social life of phonetics and phonology , 2006, J. Phonetics.

[4]  W. Labov Principles of Linguistic Change: Cognitive and Cultural Factors , 2010 .

[5]  W. Labov Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors , 1994 .

[6]  James H. Sledd Breaking, Umlaut, and the Southern Drawl , 1966 .

[7]  G. Studebaker A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[8]  Robert Allen Fox,et al.  Sex-related acoustic changes in voiceless English fricatives. , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[9]  E. Thomas An Acoustic Analysis of Vowel Variation in New World English , 2001 .

[10]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels , 1951 .

[11]  R A Fox,et al.  Dynamic Information in the Identification and Discrimination of Vowels , 1989, Phonetica.

[12]  Robert Allen Fox,et al.  Cross-generational vowel change in American English , 2011, Language Variation and Change.

[13]  Terrance M. Nearey,et al.  Modeling the role of inherent spectral change in vowel identification , 1986 .

[14]  J. Jenkins,et al.  Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  W. Labov Principles Of Linguistic Change , 1994 .

[16]  R. Fox,et al.  Between-speaker and within-speaker variation in speech tempo of American English. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Robert Allen Fox,et al.  Vowel change across three age groups of speakers in three regional varieties of American English , 2011, J. Phonetics.

[18]  W. Strange,et al.  Dynamic specification of coarticulated vowels spoken in sentence context. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Robert Allen Fox,et al.  Cross-dialectal variation in formant dynamics of American English vowels. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  A. Neel,et al.  Vowel space characteristics and vowel identification accuracy. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[21]  David B. Pisoni,et al.  Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics , 1996, Speech Commun..

[22]  J Harrington,et al.  Acoustic evidence for dynamic formant trajectories in Australian English vowels. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  T. M. Nearey,et al.  Identification of resynthesized /hVd/ utterances: effects of formant contour. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  B. Lobanov Classification of Russian Vowels Spoken by Different Speakers , 1971 .

[25]  T. M. Nearey Phonetic feature systems for vowels , 1978 .

[26]  M. Gordon Investigating Chain Shifts and Mergers , 2013 .

[27]  Cynthia G. Clopper,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of the vowel systems of six regional varieties of American English. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Roel Smits,et al.  A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  S. Zahorian,et al.  Spectral-shape features versus formants as acoustic correlates for vowels. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  S. H. Ferguson,et al.  Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: vowel intelligibility for normal-hearing listeners. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  J. Jenkins,et al.  Identification of vowels in “vowelless” syllables , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  T. M. Nearey,et al.  Effects of consonant environment on vowel formant patterns. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  T. M. Nearey,et al.  On the sufficiency of compound target specification of isolated vowels and vowels in /bVb/ syllables. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Robert Allen Fox,et al.  Regional dialect variation in the vowel systems of typically developing children. , 2011, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[35]  Robert Allen Fox,et al.  Acoustic and spectral characteristics of young children's fricative productions: a developmental perspective. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  Erik R. Thomas Sociophonetics: An Introduction , 2011 .