A state-dependent model for the optimal management of an invasive metapopulation.

Management of invasive species involves choosing between different management strategy options, but often the best strategy for a particular scenario is not obvious. We illustrate the use of optimization methods to determine the most efficient management strategy using one of the most devastating invasive forest pests in North America, the gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar), as a case study. The optimization approach involves the application of stochastic dynamic programming (SDP) to a metapopulation framework with different infestation patch sizes, with the goal of minimizing infestation spread. We use a novel "moving window" approach as a way to address a spatially explicit problem without being explicitly spatial. We examine results for two cases in order to develop general rules of thumb for management. We explore a model with limited parameter information and then assess how strategies change with specific parameterization for the gypsy moth. The model results in a complex but stable, state-dependent management strategy for a multiyear management program that is robust even under situations of uncertainty. The general rule of thumb for the basic model consists of three strategies: eradicating medium-density infestations, reducing large-density infestations, and reducing the colonization rate from the main infestation, depending on the state of the system. With specific gypsy moth parameterization, reducing colonization decreases in importance relative to the other two strategies. The application of this model to gypsy moth management emphasizes the importance of managing based on the state of the system, and if applied to a specific geographic area, has the potential to substantially improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of current gypsy moth eradication programs, helping to slow the spread of this pest. Additionally, the approach used for this particular invasive species can be extended to the optimization of management programs for the spread of other invasive and problem species exhibiting metapopulation dynamics.

[1]  Victor C. Mastro,et al.  Learning from the Legacy of Léopold Trouvelot , 1989 .

[2]  C. Clark,et al.  Dynamic Modeling in Behavioral Ecology , 2019 .

[3]  Freckleton Biological control as a learning process. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  The Allee effect, stochastic dynamics and the eradication of alien species , 2003 .

[5]  Rob Hengeveld,et al.  Dynamics of Biological Invasions , 1989 .

[6]  Chris Bright,et al.  Life Out of Bounds: Bioinvasion in a Borderless World , 1998 .

[7]  Alexei A. Sharov,et al.  BIOECONOMICS OF MANAGING THE SPREAD OFEXOTIC PEST SPECIES WITH BARRIER ZONES , 1998 .

[8]  Alexei A. Sharov,et al.  MODEL OF SLOWING THE SPREAD OF GYPSY MOTH (LEPIDOPTERA: LYMANTRIIDAE) WITH A BARRIER ZONE , 1998 .

[9]  Alan Hastings,et al.  A simple approach to optimal control of invasive species. , 2006, Theoretical population biology.

[10]  A. Hajek,et al.  Virulence and fitness of the fungal pathogen Entomophaga maimaiga in its host Lymantria dispar, for pathogen and host strains originating from Asia, Europe, and North America. , 2005, Journal of invertebrate pathology.

[11]  Alan Hastings,et al.  Finding optimal control strategies for invasive species: a density‐structured model for Spartina alterniflora , 2004 .

[12]  C. Clark,et al.  Dynamic State Variable Models in Ecology , 2000 .

[13]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Linking Wild and Captive Populations to Maximize Species Persistence: Optimal Translocation Strategies , 2004 .

[14]  M. Milgroom,et al.  Genetic diversity in the gypsy moth fungal pathogen Entomophaga maimaiga from founder populations in North America and source populations in Asia. , 2005, Mycological research.

[15]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  OPTIMAL FIRE MANAGEMENT FOR MAINTAINING COMMUNITY DIVERSITY , 1999 .

[16]  Gregory A. Elmes,et al.  Gypsy moth invasion in North America: a quantitative analysis , 1992 .

[17]  Fritzi S. Grevstad,et al.  Simulating control strategies for a spatially structured weed invasion: Spartina alterniflora (Loisel) in Pacific Coast estuaries , 2005, Biological Invasions.

[18]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Minimise long-term loss or maximise short-term gain? Optimal translocation strategies for threatened species , 2007 .

[19]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Optimal release strategies for biological control agents: an application of stochastic dynamic programming to population management , 2000 .

[20]  J. D. Podgwaite,et al.  Comparison of Aerially-Applied Gypchek Strains Against Gypsy Moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) in the Presence of an Entomophaga maimaiga Epizootic , 2005 .

[21]  E. J. Milner-Gulland,et al.  A STOCHASTIC DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING MODEL FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE SAIGA ANTELOPE , 1997 .

[22]  C. T. Moore,et al.  Optimal Regeneration Planning for Old-Growth Forest: Addressing Scientific Uncertainty in Endangered Species Recovery through Adaptive Management , 2006 .

[23]  R. Medd,et al.  A stochastic dynamic programming framework for weed control decision making: an application to Avena fatua L. , 1991 .

[24]  Alexei A. Sharov,et al.  Optimizing the Use of Barrier Zones to Slow the Spread of Gypsy Moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) in North America , 1998 .

[25]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  What Is the Allee Effect , 1999 .

[26]  Richard N. Mack,et al.  Controlling the spread of plant invasions: The importance of nascent foci. , 1988 .

[27]  F. Vermeylen,et al.  Persistence of the fungal pathogen Entomophaga maimaiga and its impact on native Lymantriidae , 2004 .

[28]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  What causes outbreaks of the gypsy moth in North America? , 2000, Population Ecology.

[29]  H. Mooney Species without frontiers , 1999, Nature.

[30]  P. Tobin,et al.  Persistence of invading gypsy moth populations in the United States , 2006, Oecologia.

[31]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Prediction of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) mating success from pheromone trap counts. , 1995 .

[32]  David A. Bohan,et al.  Ballooning dispersal using silk: world fauna, phylogenies, genetics and models. , 2005, Bulletin of entomological research.

[33]  Kurt W. Gottschalk,et al.  Mapping host-species abundance of three major exotic forest pests , 2005 .

[34]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Geographical variation in the periodicity of gypsy moth outbreaks , 2006 .

[35]  H. P. Possingham,et al.  State-Dependent Decision Analysis for Conservation Biology , 1997 .

[36]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  “Slow The Spread”: A National Program to Contain the Gypsy Moth , 2002, Journal of Forestry.

[37]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Can culling a threatened species increase its chance of persisting , 2007 .

[38]  A. Sharov,et al.  Management of the Gypsy Moth through a Decision Algorithm under the STS Project , 2004 .

[39]  Richard T. Roush,et al.  ACTIVE ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT IN INSECT PEST AND WEED CONTROL: INTERVENTION WITH A PLAN FOR LEARNING , 2002 .

[40]  Keith R Hayes,et al.  Biological invasions: recommendations for U.S. policy and management. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[41]  W. C. Allee Animal Aggregations: A Study in General Sociology , 1931 .

[42]  Christopher Costello,et al.  Avoiding invasives: trade-related policies for controlling unintentional exotic species introductions☆ , 2004 .

[43]  Victor C. Mastro,et al.  Invasion by Exotic Forest Pests: A Threat to Forest Ecosystems , 1995 .

[44]  D. Simberloff,et al.  BIOTIC INVASIONS: CAUSES, EPIDEMIOLOGY, GLOBAL CONSEQUENCES, AND CONTROL , 2000 .

[45]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Invasion speed is affected by geographical variation in the strength of Allee effects. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[46]  Suzanne Lenhart,et al.  Optimal control for management of an invasive plant species. , 2006, Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE.

[47]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  The Evolving Use of Insecticides in Gypsy Moth Management , 1999, Journal of Forestry.

[48]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Spread of invading organisms , 1990, Landscape Ecology.

[49]  John K. Scott,et al.  Potential risk of accidental introduction of Asian gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar) to Australasia: effects of climatic conditions and suitability of native plants , 2001 .

[50]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics: a brief his-tory and conceptual domain , 1991 .

[51]  Y. Ben-Haim Information-gap decision theory : decisions under severe uncertainty , 2001 .

[52]  Wayne M. Getz,et al.  The use of stochastic dynamic programming in optimal landscape reconstruction for metapopulations , 2003 .

[53]  N. Shigesada,et al.  Biological Invasions: Theory and Practice , 1997 .

[54]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  POPULATION DYNAMICS OF GYPSY MOTH IN NORTH AMERICA , 1990 .

[55]  Cindy E. Hauser,et al.  Optimal control of Atlantic population Canada geese , 2005 .

[56]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Growth of newly established alien populations: comparison of North American gypsy moth colonies with invasion theory , 2006, Population Ecology.