Design for sustainability in companies: strategies, drivers and needs of Turkey's best performing businesses

Abstract Experts have been developing design for sustainability tools and methods for several decades, but their practical application remains challenging and varies in different contexts. The limited literature on design for sustainability in Turkey reflects the inadequacy of legislation, market demand and companies' practices; nonetheless, one can find good examples of design for sustainability in the country. This study investigates the best performing companies in Turkey's sustainability field through a survey that addresses the barriers they face, the benefits they achieve, their further needs for achieving sustainability and the scope of, and drivers for, the practices. Findings indicate that among the design for sustainability strategies, the sample companies are more active in ‘producing and manufacturing’ and ‘packaging’. They are driven to ‘boost brand value and reputation’ but not to ‘increase exports’. Inadequate ‘market demand’ and ‘legislation’ are by far the biggest barriers. Companies' needs to carry out sustainability activities are high, but mostly with regards to ‘research & development’. Recent results differ somewhat from the earlier findings in Turkey and to a greater extent from previous studies in Europe. In Turkey, design for sustainability is still comprehended as an issue of production needing the attention and expertise of designers. It can generate benefits even when its practice is limited. Promoting design for sustainability within the industry by providing good examples can increase its impact. This study builds a background for future research on design for sustainability and for spreading its use by companies, universities, intermediaries and policy makers. The results might be applicable to other contexts experiencing similar setbacks on sustainability as the Turkish industry.

[1]  Garrette Clark,et al.  Evolution of the global sustainable consumption and production policy and the United Nations Environment Programme's (UNEP) supporting activities , 2007 .

[2]  Casper Boks,et al.  The soft side of ecodesign , 2006 .

[3]  Han Brezet,et al.  Ecodesign : a promising approach to sustainable production and consumption , 1997 .

[4]  M.R.M. Crul,et al.  Ecodesign in Central America , 2003 .

[5]  Jacqueline Cramer,et al.  Barriers and stimuli for ecodesign in SMEs , 2002 .

[6]  Carlo Vezzoli,et al.  The Learning Network on Sustainability: an e-mechanism for the development and diffusion of teaching materials and tools on design for sustainability in an open-source and copy left ethos , 2011 .

[7]  J. M. Cramer,et al.  Strategic environmental product planning within Philips sound & vision , 1997 .

[8]  A. Türk The benefits associated with ISO 14001 certification for construction firms: Turkish case , 2009 .

[9]  G. Norman Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics , 2010, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[10]  Ezio Manzini,et al.  Emerging User Demands for Sustainable Solutions, EMUDE , 2007 .

[11]  Michael J. Pisani,et al.  Institutionalizing sustainability: an empirical study of corporate registration and commitment to the United Nations global compact guidelines , 2011 .

[12]  Joachim H. Spangenberg,et al.  Design for Sustainability (DfS): the interface of sustainable production and consumption , 2010 .

[13]  Michael McGuire,et al.  Eco-design practice in the context of a structured design process: an interdisciplinary empirical study of UK manufacturers , 2013 .

[14]  Victor J. Papanek,et al.  Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change , 1972 .

[15]  Carlo Vezzoli,et al.  Design for Environmental Sustainability , 2008 .

[16]  Vicky Lofthouse,et al.  Investigation into the role of core industrial designers in ecodesign projects , 2004 .

[17]  宮島 久雄,et al.  Victor Papanek : Design for the Rearl World---Human Ecology and Social Change Pantheon Books, New York 1971. , 1974 .

[18]  Rocco J. Perla,et al.  Ten Common Misunderstandings, Misconceptions, Persistent Myths and Urban Legends about Likert Scales and Likert Response Formats and their Antidotes , 2007 .

[19]  Hilmi Yüksel,et al.  An empirical evaluation of cleaner production practices in Turkey , 2008 .

[20]  I Gaziulusoy Implementations in relation to sustainable development in industry and industrial design profession: a case of Arcelik corporation , 2003 .

[21]  Rodrigo Lozano,et al.  Towards better embedding sustainability into companies’ systems: an analysis of voluntary corporate initiatives , 2012 .

[22]  Sandra Meredith Environmental innovation and small and medium-sized enterprises , 2017 .

[23]  Conny Bakker Environmental Information for Industrial Designers , 1995 .

[24]  Paul Knight,et al.  Adopting and applying eco-design techniques: a practitioners perspective , 2009 .