Imaging of amyloid plaques and cerebral glucose metabolism in semantic dementia and Alzheimer’s disease

Semantic dementia (SD) is a rare clinical syndrome, assigned to the group of frontotemporal lobar degenerations (FTLD). Histopathological analysis has not revealed the deposition of amyloid plaques in the majority of SD cases, in contrast to dementia of the Alzheimer type (AD). However, based on clinical examination alone a reliable differentiation of the underlying pathology cannot be guaranteed, i.e. AD and SD may be confused in some cases. Our aim was to determine, whether AD and SD can be differentiated in vivo by means of amyloid plaque PET imaging. In groups of AD and SD patients, matched for gender, age and overall degree of cognitive impairment, cerebral glucose metabolism was examined with [(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET and cerebral amyloid plaque density was assessed using [(11)C]6-OH-BTA-1 (PIB)-PET. A volume-of-interest analysis (VOI), using the cerebellum as a reference region, and voxel-based statistical group comparisons (SPM2) were carried out between the patient groups and matched groups of healthy controls. To control for a potential influence of atrophy on the PET findings, a correction of partial volume effects was performed. Characteristic patterns of hypometabolism could be demonstrated in both clinically defined AD and SD with some regional overlap and subtle differences (AD: bilateral posterior cingulate, temporoparietal and frontal cortex; SD: left>right polar temporal, frontal mesial cortex). Compared with healthy controls, significant [(11)C]PIB amyloid plaque tracer binding was observed only in patients with AD (in bilateral temporoparietal, frontal and posterior cingulate cortex and the precuneus) but not in SD. This difference in amyloid plaque deposition could be reproduced in direct statistical comparison of AD and SD and clearly extended the metabolic differences between the patient groups. These findings support the notion that SD can be diagnosed in vivo as a separate entity from AD using amyloid plaque imaging. In general, amyloid plaque PET may complement neuropsychological assessment regarding reliable differential diagnosis of AD and FTLD dementias based on characterization of underlying pathology and may improve the definition of individual prognosis and the selection of patients for scientific trials.

[1]  Brian J Bacskai,et al.  Four-dimensional multiphoton imaging of brain entry, amyloid binding, and clearance of an amyloid-β ligand in transgenic mice , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Jing Shi,et al.  Histopathological changes underlying frontotemporal lobar degeneration with clinicopathological correlation , 2005, Acta Neuropathologica.

[3]  B. Miller,et al.  Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: demographic characteristics of 353 patients. , 2005, Archives of neurology.

[4]  M. Folstein,et al.  Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease , 1984, Neurology.

[5]  Sanjiv S. Gambhir,et al.  AMIDE: A Free Software Tool for Multimodality Medical Image Analysis , 2003 .

[6]  E. Mandelkow,et al.  Tau in Alzheimer's disease. , 1998, Trends in cell biology.

[7]  B. L. Miller,et al.  11 CPIB PET imaging in Alzheimer disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration , 2007 .

[8]  Michel Goedert,et al.  Frontotemporal lobar degeneration through loss of progranulin function. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  Manabu Ikeda,et al.  Epidemiology of Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration , 2004, Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders.

[10]  Mrc Cognition,et al.  The pathological basis of semantic dementia , 2005 .

[11]  A Drzezga,et al.  Schooling mediates brain reserve in Alzheimer’s disease: findings of fluoro-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography , 2006, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[12]  R. Mohs,et al.  Consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer's disease (CERAD) clinical and neuropsychological assessment of Alzheimer's disease. , 2002, Psychopharmacology bulletin.

[13]  M N Rossor,et al.  Patterns of temporal lobe atrophy in semantic dementia and Alzheimer's disease , 2001, Annals of neurology.

[14]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The Relationship between Global and Local Changes in PET Scans , 1990, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[15]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[16]  Julie S. Snowden,et al.  Semantic Dysfunction in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration , 1999, Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders.

[17]  J. Morris,et al.  The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD). Part I. Clinical and neuropsychological assesment of Alzheimer's disease , 1989, Neurology.

[18]  G. Small,et al.  Localization of neurofibrillary tangles and beta-amyloid plaques in the brains of living patients with Alzheimer disease. , 2002, The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.

[19]  S. DeKosky,et al.  Kinetic Modeling of Amyloid Binding in Humans using PET Imaging and Pittsburgh Compound-B , 2005, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[20]  Tim D. Fryer,et al.  Declarative memory impairments in Alzheimer's disease and semantic dementia , 2006, NeuroImage.

[21]  Victor L. Villemagne,et al.  Imaginem oblivionis: the prospects of neuroimaging for early detection of Alzheimer's disease , 2005, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[22]  W. Klunk,et al.  Imaging brain amyloid in Alzheimer's disease with Pittsburgh Compound‐B , 2004, Annals of neurology.

[23]  A. Drzezga,et al.  Prediction of individual clinical outcome in MCI by means of genetic assessment and (18)F-FDG PET. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[24]  Lisa A. Weissfeld,et al.  Evaluation of voxel-based methods for the statistical analysis of PIB PET amyloid imaging studies in Alzheimer's disease , 2006, NeuroImage.

[25]  B. Sahakian,et al.  Differing patterns of temporal atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease and semantic dementia , 2001, Neurology.

[26]  J. Morris,et al.  Tangles and plaques in nondemented aging and “preclinical” Alzheimer's disease , 1999, Annals of neurology.

[27]  Gina N. LaRossa,et al.  Inverse relation between in vivo amyloid imaging load and cerebrospinal fluid Aβ42 in humans , 2006, Annals of neurology.

[28]  J. Morris The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) , 1993, Neurology.

[29]  M. Freedman,et al.  Frontotemporal lobar degeneration , 1998, Neurology.

[31]  K Yaffe,et al.  Frontotemporal dementia progresses to death faster than Alzheimer disease , 2005, Neurology.

[32]  G. C. Román,et al.  Vascular dementia , 1993, Neurology.

[33]  J. Morris,et al.  The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD). Part XIII. , 1996, Neurology.

[34]  Satoshi Minoshima,et al.  Imaging Alzheimer's disease: clinical applications. , 2003, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.

[35]  Murray Grossman,et al.  Frontotemporal dementia: A review , 2002, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[36]  Lisa A. Weissfeld,et al.  P2-285 Voxel-based analyses of pittsburgh Compound-B and FDG in AD , 2006, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[37]  A. Monsch,et al.  Normal ranges of neuropsychological tests for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. , 2000, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[38]  B. Miller,et al.  11C-PIB PET imaging in Alzheimer disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration , 2007, Neurology.

[39]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[40]  U Seligsohn,et al.  Improved method for genotyping apolipoprotein E polymorphisms by a PCR-based assay simultaneously utilizing two distinct restriction enzymes. , 1997, Clinical chemistry.

[41]  S. DeKosky,et al.  Simplified quantification of Pittsburgh Compound B amyloid imaging PET studies: a comparative analysis. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[42]  G. Alexander,et al.  Positron emission tomography in evaluation of dementia: Regional brain metabolism and long-term outcome. , 2001, JAMA.

[43]  A. Probst,et al.  Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration , 2001, Gerontology.

[44]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[45]  H. Engler,et al.  Two-year follow-up of amyloid deposition in patients with Alzheimer's disease. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[46]  J. Hodges,et al.  Semantic dementia: clinical, radiological and pathological perspectives , 2000, Journal of Neurology.

[47]  Gershon T Lesser,et al.  Frequency of bowel movements and future risk of Parkinson's disease. , 2002, Neurology.

[48]  William E. Klunk,et al.  IC–103–05: Pittsburgh compound–B four years later: What have we learned, what lies ahead? , 2006 .

[49]  D. Neary,et al.  Classification and Description of Frontotemporal Dementias , 2000, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[50]  K Herholz,et al.  FDG PET and Differential Diagnosis of Dementia , 1995, Alzheimer disease and associated disorders.

[51]  L. Mosconi,et al.  Brain glucose metabolism in the early and specific diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[52]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Sporadic and familial dementia with ubiquitin-positive tau-negative inclusions: clinical features of one histopathological abnormality underlying frontotemporal lobar degeneration. , 2005, Archives of neurology.

[53]  A. Drzezga,et al.  Cerebral metabolic patterns at early stages of frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia. A PET study , 2004, Neurobiology of Aging.

[54]  R. Faber,et al.  Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. , 1999, Neurology.