An Instrument for Assessing Scientists’ Written Skills in Public Communication of Science
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] A. Collins,et al. Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .
[2] Michael Halliday,et al. Some grammatical problems in scientific English , 1989 .
[3] Ken Heller,et al. Grading student problem solutions: The challenge of sending a consistent message , 2004 .
[4] Steven Miller,et al. Can Science Communication Workshops Train Scientists for Reflexive Public Engagement? , 2009 .
[5] Norman G. Lederman. Nature of Science: Past, Present, and Future , 2013 .
[6] E. Wenger. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .
[7] H. Sevian,et al. Analysing how Scientists Explain their Research: A rubric for measuring the effectiveness of scientific explanations , 2008 .
[8] Pablo Jensen,et al. A statistical picture of popularization activities and their evolutions in France , 2011 .
[9] Cornelia Dean. Am I Making Myself Clear?: A Scientist's Guide to Talking to the Public , 2009 .
[10] A. Ryan,et al. The Development of a New Instrument: "Views on Science- Technology-Society" (VOSTS) , 1992 .
[11] D. Grossman,et al. A Scientist's Guide To Talking With The Media: Practical Advice from the Union of Concerned Scientists , 2006 .
[12] J. Osborne,et al. Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education , 2002 .
[13] Stephen P. Norris,et al. A theoretical framework for narrative explanation in science , 2005 .
[14] R. Flesch. A new readability yardstick. , 1948, The Journal of applied psychology.
[15] Sharon Dunwoody,et al. Scientific Barriers to the Popularization of Science in the Mass Media. , 1985 .
[16] H.B. Michaelson,et al. How to write and publish a scientific paper , 1981, Proceedings of the IEEE.
[17] A. Baram‐Tsabari,et al. Exploring new web-based tools to identify public interest in science , 2011 .
[18] W. McComas. Benchmarks for Science Literacy , 2014 .
[19] Jack Selzer,et al. Understanding scientific prose , 1993 .
[20] J. Ziman,et al. Public knowledge. An essay concerning the social dimension of science , 1970, Medical History.
[21] R. Whitley,et al. Expository Science: Forms and Functions of Popularisation , 1985 .
[22] Stuart A. Karabenick,et al. Cognitive Processing of Self-Report Items in Educational Research: Do They Think What We Mean? , 2007 .
[23] Yair Neuman,et al. Construction of Collective and Individual Knowledge in Argumentative Activity , 2003 .
[24] Etienne Wenger,et al. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .
[25] Sharon Dunwoody,et al. Science-Media Interface , 2008 .
[26] Bruce V. Lewenstein,et al. When science meets the public : proceedings of a workshop organized by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Committee on Public Understanding of Science and Technology, February 17, 1991, Washington, DC , 1992 .
[27] AC Grayling,et al. Laboratory life Rebecca Lemov World as Laboratory: Exper , 2006, The Lancet.
[28] Dietram A. Scheufele,et al. What's next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. , 2009, American journal of botany.
[29] Randy L. Bell,et al. Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science , 2002 .
[30] Debbie Treise,et al. Advancing Science Communication , 2002 .
[31] Jesús Rey-Rocha,et al. Scientists' motivation to communicate science and technology to the public: surveying participants at the Madrid Science Fair , 2008 .
[32] R Schofield,et al. Reliable Knowledge: An exploration of the grounds for belief in science , 1979 .
[33] Sarah R. Davies,et al. Constructing Communication , 2008 .
[34] D. P. Hayes,et al. The growing inaccessibility of science , 1992, Nature.
[35] J. Besley,et al. What Science Communication Scholars Think About Training Scientists to Communicate , 2011 .
[36] J. Lemke. Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values , 1990 .
[37] Dietmar Janetzko,et al. NET Objectivity , Reliability , and Validity of Search Engine Count Estimates , 2008 .
[38] E. Salas,et al. Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. , 1993 .
[39] Patrick Sturgis,et al. Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis , 2008 .
[40] P. Hewson,et al. Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change , 1982 .
[41] Julian Cribb,et al. Sharing Knowledge: A Guide to Effective Science Communication , 2002 .
[42] Nancy Baron,et al. Escape from the Ivory Tower: A Guide to Making Your Science Matter , 2010 .
[43] B. Eylon,et al. Explaining the Unexplainable: Translated Scientific Explanations (TSE) in public physics lectures , 2010 .
[44] A. Baram‐Tsabari,et al. Seeking science information online: Data mining Google to better understand the roles of the media and the education system , 2012, Public Understanding of Science.
[45] B. Eylon,et al. Goals and design of public physics lectures: perspectives of high-school students, physics teachers and lecturers , 2009 .
[46] Antoinette M. Wilkenson. The scientist's handbook for writing papers and dissertations , 1991 .