Developmental Regulation of Lck Targeting to the CD8 Coreceptor Controls Signaling in Naive and Memory T Cells

The question of whether enhanced memory T cell responses are simply due to an increased frequency of specific cells or also to an improved response at the single cell level is widely debated. In this study, we analyzed T cell receptor (TCR) transgenic memory T cells and bona fide memory T cells isolated from virally infected normal mice using the tetramer technology. We found that memory T cells are qualitatively different from naive T cells due to a developmentally regulated rearrangement of the topology of the signaling machinery. In naive cytotoxic T cells, only a few CD8 molecules are associated with Lck and the kinase is homogeneously distributed inside the cell. However, in vivo priming of naive T cells induces the targeting of Lck to the CD8 coreceptor in the cell membrane and the consequent organization of a more efficient TCR signaling machinery in effector and memory cells.

[1]  M. Bachmann,et al.  Distinct kinetics of cytokine production and cytolysis in effector and memory T cells after viral infection , 1999, European journal of immunology.

[2]  S. Gordon,et al.  Lack of p56  lck expression correlates with CD4 endocytosis in primary lymphoid and myeloid cells , 1998, European journal of immunology.

[3]  L. Samelson,et al.  LAT palmitoylation: its essential role in membrane microdomain targeting and tyrosine phosphorylation during T cell activation. , 1998, Immunity.

[4]  L. Tuosto,et al.  CD28 affects the earliest signaling events generated by TCR engagement , 1998, European journal of immunology.

[5]  R. Xavier,et al.  Membrane compartmentation is required for efficient T cell activation. , 1998, Immunity.

[6]  J. Sprent,et al.  Potent and selective stimulation of memory-phenotype CD8+ T cells in vivo by IL-15. , 1998, Immunity.

[7]  J. Altman,et al.  Counting antigen-specific CD8 T cells: a reevaluation of bystander activation during viral infection. , 1998, Immunity.

[8]  L. Tuosto,et al.  Quantitative Contribution of CD4 and CD8 to T Cell Antigen Receptor Serial Triggering , 1997, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[9]  T. Mak,et al.  Distinct roles for LFA-1 and CD28 during activation of naive T cells: adhesion versus costimulation. , 1997, Immunity.

[10]  S. Ley,et al.  S‐acylation of LCK protein tyrosine kinase is essential for its signalling function in T lymphocytes , 1997, The EMBO journal.

[11]  D. Speiser,et al.  Functional management of an antiviral cytotoxic T-cell response , 1997, Journal of virology.

[12]  F. Lemonnier,et al.  Differential requirements for survival and proliferation of CD8 naïve or memory T cells. , 1997, Science.

[13]  M. Resh,et al.  Palmitoylation of p59fyn is reversible and sufficient for plasma membrane association. , 1997, Molecular biology of the cell.

[14]  R. Zinkernagel,et al.  Bystander Activation of Cytotoxic T Cells: Studies on the Mechanism and Evaluation of In Vivo Significance in a Transgenic Mouse Model , 1997, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[15]  S. Mumby Reversible palmitoylation of signaling proteins. , 1997, Current opinion in cell biology.

[16]  R. Zinkernagel,et al.  Protection against immunopathological consequences of a viral infection by activated but not resting cytotoxic T cells: T cell memory without "memory T cells"? , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  P. A. Peterson,et al.  CD8 enhances formation of stable T-cell receptor/MHC class I molecule complexes , 1996, Nature.

[18]  Philip J. R. Goulder,et al.  Phenotypic Analysis of Antigen-Specific T Lymphocytes , 1996, Science.

[19]  T. Mak,et al.  T cell responses are governed by avidity and co‐stimulatory thresholds , 1996, European journal of immunology.

[20]  Antonio Lanzavecchia,et al.  T Cell Activation Determined by T Cell Receptor Number and Tunable Thresholds , 1996, Science.

[21]  J. Sprent,et al.  Induction of Bystander T Cell Proliferation by Viruses and Type I Interferon in Vivo , 1996, Science.

[22]  T. Mak,et al.  T cell responses are governed by avidity and costimulatory thresholds , 1996 .

[23]  David Gray,et al.  Immunological Memory and Protective Immunity: Understanding Their Relation , 1996, Science.

[24]  R. Zinkernagel,et al.  Immunological Memory , 2006 .

[25]  A. Müllbacher,et al.  Aspects of Cytotoxic T Cell Memory , 1996, Immunological reviews.

[26]  H. Pircher,et al.  Visualization, characterization, and turnover of CD8+ memory T cells in virus-infected hosts , 1996, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[27]  A. Lanzavecchia,et al.  Serial triggering of many T-cell receptors by a few peptide–MHC complexes , 1995, Nature.

[28]  M. Davis,et al.  Antigen-specific development of primary and memory T cells in vivo. , 1995, Science.

[29]  P. Romero,et al.  CD8 modulation of T-cell antigen receptor–ligand interactions on living cytotoxic T lymphocytes , 1995, Nature.

[30]  J. Sprent,et al.  Lymphocyte life-span and memory. , 1994, Science.

[31]  P. Doherty,et al.  CD8+ T-cell memory to viruses. , 1994, Current opinion in immunology.

[32]  W. Rodgers,et al.  Signals determining protein tyrosine kinase and glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol-anchored protein targeting to a glycolipid-enriched membrane fraction , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[33]  R. Ahmed,et al.  Cytotoxic T-cell memory without antigen , 1994, Nature.

[34]  Peter C. Doherty,et al.  Virus-specific CD8+ T-cell memory determined by clonal burst size , 1994, Nature.

[35]  R. Welsh,et al.  Cross-reactivities in memory cytotoxic T lymphocyte recognition of heterologous viruses , 1994, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[36]  M. Croft,et al.  Naive versus memory CD4 T cell response to antigen. Memory cells are less dependent on accessory cell costimulation and can respond to many antigen-presenting cell types including resting B cells. , 1994, Journal of immunology.

[37]  Dan R. Littman,et al.  Signal transduction by lymphocyte antigen receptors , 1994, Cell.

[38]  A. Müllbacher The long-term maintenance of cytotoxic T cell memory does not require persistence of antigen , 1994, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[39]  P. Portolés,et al.  Genetic and immunochemical evidence for CD4‐dependent association of p56lck with the alpha beta T‐cell receptor (TCR): regulation of TCR‐induced activation. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[40]  A. Shaw,et al.  Palmitylation of an amino-terminal cysteine motif of protein tyrosine kinases p56lck and p59fyn mediates interaction with glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins , 1993, Molecular and cellular biology.

[41]  M. Marsh,et al.  Internalization and recycling of CD4 transfected into HeLa and NIH3T3 cells. , 1989, The EMBO journal.

[42]  H. Pircher,et al.  Tolerance induction in double specific T-cell receptor transgenic mice varies with antigen , 1989, Nature.

[43]  P. Parham,et al.  Cell-cell adhesion mediated by CD8 and MHC class I molecules , 1988, Nature.

[44]  J. Strominger,et al.  Interaction between CD4 and class II MHC molecules mediates cell adhesion , 1987, Nature.

[45]  P. Pereira,et al.  T Cell‐Dependent B Cell Activation , 1984, Immunological reviews.

[46]  L. Herzenberg,et al.  Xenogeneic Monoclonal Antibodies to Mouse Lymphoid Differentiation Antigens * , 1979, Immunological reviews.

[47]  A. Lanzavecchia,et al.  The duration of antigenic stimulation determines the fate of naive and effector T cells. , 1998, Immunity.

[48]  J Bajorath,et al.  Immune regulation by CD40 and its ligand GP39. , 1996, Annual review of immunology.

[49]  H. von Boehmer,et al.  On the cellular basis of immunological T cell memory. , 1995, Immunity.