Simulations of combustion with normal and angled hydrogen injection in a cavity-based supersonic combustor

Combustion characteristics in a supersonic combustor with normal and angled hydrogen injection upstream of a cavity flameholder are investigated numerically using a hybrid Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes/large eddy simulation method acting as a wall-modeled large eddy simulation. A turbulent incoming boundary layer with thickness of δinf = 2.5 mm is considered and a recycling/rescaling method is adopted to treat the unsteady inflow. Three injection angles, α = 30°, 60° and 90°, are considered. The results show that combustion efficiency increases with increasing injection angle since the fuel jet with larger injection angle tends to benefit more from the close coupling of flow, mixing and combustion. Moreover, it is found that the heat release distribution in the streamwise direction is more uniformly for larger injection angle than for lower injection angle, which tends to result in higher total pressure recovery in the far downstream regions for larger injection angle as uniformly-distributed heat release seems beneficial to reduce the total pressure loss for the present diffusion combustion.

[1]  Akira Yoshizawa,et al.  A Statistically-Derived Subgrid-Scale Kinetic Energy Model for the Large-Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Flows , 1985 .

[2]  Zhenguo Wang,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Study on Flame Stabilization in a Supersonic Combustor with Hydrogen Injection Upstream of Cavity Flameholders , 2009 .

[3]  Peter Gerlinger,et al.  An implicit numerical scheme for turbulent combustion using an assumed pdf approach , 1999 .

[4]  J. C. Dutton,et al.  Wall Pressure Measurements for a Sonic Jet Injected Transversely into a Supersonic Crossflow , 1998 .

[5]  C. J. Jachimowski,et al.  An analytical study of the hydrogen-air reaction mechanism with application to scramjet combustion , 1988 .

[6]  P. Spalart A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows , 1992 .

[7]  S. O’Byrne,et al.  Investigation of Supersonic Combustion with Angled Injection in a Cavity-Based Combustor , 2008 .

[8]  S. Baek,et al.  Numerical study on supersonic combustion with cavity-based fuel injection , 2004 .

[9]  Kousuke Nishida,et al.  Analysis of entropy generation and exergy loss during combustion , 2002 .

[10]  Ronald K. Hanson,et al.  Cavity Flame-Holders for Ignition and Flame Stabilization in Scramjets: An Overview , 2001 .

[11]  R. A. Baurle,et al.  Modeling of turbulent supersonic H2-air combustion with a multivariate beta PDF , 1993 .

[12]  J. Driscoll,et al.  Combustion characteristics of a dual-mode scramjet combustor with cavity flameholder , 2009 .

[13]  Juan G. Santiago,et al.  Velocity Measurements of a Jet Injected into a Supersonic Crossflow , 1997 .

[14]  Sean M. Torrez,et al.  Heat Release Distribution in a Dual-Mode Scramjet Combustor - Measurements and Modeling , 2009 .

[15]  Ronald K. Hanson,et al.  Supersonic combustion of cross-flow jets and the influence of cavity flame-holders , 1999 .

[16]  Sharath S. Girimaji,et al.  Assumed PDF turbulence-chemistry closure with temperature-composition correlations , 2003 .

[17]  J. Driscoll,et al.  Reaction Zone Imaging in a Dual-Mode Scramjet Combustor Using CH-PLIF , 2008 .

[18]  S. Lele,et al.  Large-Eddy Simulation of Jet Mixing in a Supersonic Turbulent Crossflow , 2009 .

[19]  G. Candler,et al.  Supersonic combustor fuel injection simulations using a hybrid RANS/LES approach , 2010 .

[20]  Corin Segal,et al.  The Scramjet Engine: Processes and Characteristics , 2009 .

[21]  Chi-Wang Shu,et al.  Efficient Implementation of Weighted ENO Schemes , 1995 .

[22]  N. Qin,et al.  A dynamic pressure-sink method for improving large eddy simulation and hybrid Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes/large eddy simulation of wall-bounded flows , 2012 .

[23]  Robert P. Lucht,et al.  Mixing of a Sonic Transverse Jet Injected into a Supersonic Flow , 2000 .

[24]  Jianhan Liang,et al.  Flame Characteristics in Supersonic Combustor with Hydrogen Injection Upstream of Cavity Flameholder , 2008 .

[25]  Zhenguo Wang,et al.  Mixing Characteristics in a Supersonic Combustor with Gaseous Fuel Injection Upstream of a Cavity Flameholder , 2009 .

[26]  Ning Qin,et al.  A hybrid LES (Large Eddy Simulation)/assumed sub-grid PDF (Probability Density Function) model for supersonic turbulent combustion , 2011 .

[27]  F. Billig,et al.  Supersonic combustion experiments with a cavity-based fuel injector , 1999 .

[28]  O. Tuncer Combustion in a Ramjet Combustor with Cavity Flame Holder , 2010 .

[29]  Daniel James Micka,et al.  Combustion stabilization, structure, and spreading in a laboratory dual-mode scramjet combustor , 2010 .

[30]  Suresh Menon,et al.  The compressible hybrid RANS/LES formulation using an additive operator , 2009, J. Comput. Phys..

[31]  Soshi Kawai,et al.  Mechanisms of Jet Mixing in a Supersonic Crossflow: A Study Using Large-Eddy Simulation , 2008 .

[32]  Sharath S. Girimaji A simple recipe for modeling reaction-rate in flows with turbulent-combustion , 1991 .

[33]  Charles R. Mcclinton,et al.  Investigation of scramjet injection strategies for high Mach number flows , 1995 .