PCA vs. tensor-based dimension reduction methods: An empirical comparison on active shape models of organs

How to model shape variations plays an important role in active shape models that is widely used in model-based medical image segmentation, and principal component analysis is a common approach for this task. Recently, different tensor-based dimension reduction methods have been proposed and have achieved better performances than PCA in face recognition. However, how they perform in modeling 3D shape variations of organs in terms of reconstruction errors in medical image analysis is still unclear. In this paper, we propose to use tensor-based dimension reduction methods to model shape variations. We empirically compare two-dimensional principal component analysis, the parallel factor model and the Tucker decomposition with PCA in terms of the reconstruction errors. From our experimental results on several different organs such as livers, spleens and kidneys, 2DPCA performs best among the four compared methods, and the performance differences between 2DPCA and the other methods are statistically significant.

[1]  Wen Gao,et al.  Unified Principal Component Analysis with generalized Covariance Matrix for face recognition , 2008, 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[2]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Multilinear Analysis of Image Ensembles: TensorFaces , 2002, ECCV.

[3]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Multilinear independent components analysis , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[4]  Richard A. Harshman,et al.  Foundations of the PARAFAC procedure: Models and conditions for an "explanatory" multi-model factor analysis , 1970 .

[5]  T. Heimann,et al.  Implementing the Automatic Generation of 3 D Statistical Shape Models with ITK Release , 2006 .

[6]  Fillia Makedon,et al.  High dimensional statistical shape model for medical image analysis , 2008, 2008 5th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[7]  L. Tucker,et al.  Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis , 1966, Psychometrika.

[8]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Appearance Models , 2001, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[9]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Multilinear image analysis for facial recognition , 2002, Object recognition supported by user interaction for service robots.

[10]  Narendra Ahuja,et al.  A Tensor Approximation Approach to Dimensionality Reduction , 2008, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[11]  Alejandro F. Frangi,et al.  Two-dimensional PCA: a new approach to appearance-based face representation and recognition , 2004 .

[12]  Tamara G. Kolda,et al.  Categories and Subject Descriptors: G.4 [Mathematics of Computing]: Mathematical Software— , 2022 .

[13]  Tamara G. Kolda,et al.  Tensor Decompositions and Applications , 2009, SIAM Rev..