Meteoric versus burial control on porosity evolution of the Smackover Formation

Whole-rock 13C, 18O, and Sr compositions of the uppermost ooid grainstones of the Smackover Formation at Black Creek field in Mississippi reveal characteristics of a meteoric system in this area. The trend in 13C signatures indicates that meteoric water acquired its low carbon values at a soil zone and was buffered completely with the host rock before entering the meteoric lens. Identical 18O data suggest that allochems stabilized at the same temperatures in waters of similar 18O compositions during early meteoric diagenesis; that is, calcitization continued to completion before the onset of burial. Sr concentrations reveal differential transformation mechanisms. Low Sr values in the phreatic zones are attributed to slow stabilization by exchange with the bulk solution. High Sr compositions in the vadose zone resulted from rapid, incremental transformation.Meteoric cementation was sparse; therefore, grainstones entered the burial realm with all of their porosity intact. Modification of porosity was a burial process and was directly related to the intensity of chemical compaction, which itself was controlled by three factors: (1) the degree of early cementation, (2) grain type, and (3) grain size. Early-cemented intervals experienced low to moderate compaction regardless of grain size or grain type. In the absence of early cementation, grain type and grain size were the dominant factors of porosity control. Coarse-grained intervals that were composed of micritic grains experienced less compaction than fine-grained, oolitic intervals.Average volumetric percentages of cements as determined by point counting of 63 samples are as follows: (1) marine and meteoric cements = 1.5%, (2) prebitumen calcite = 6.5%, (3) saddle dolomite = 1%, (4) postbitumen calcite = 4.3%, (5) pyrobitumen = 1%. Total cement (sum of 1–5), total burial cement (sum of 2–5), and total burial carbonate cement volumes (sum of 2–4) average 14, 13, and 12%, respectively. Out of an original porosity of 40%, 13 porosity units were lost by cementation, and 27 porosity units were reduced by compaction (mechanical and chemical).Present-day intergranular porosity of these grainstones is zero, whether they belonged to the vadose zone or the phreatic interval. Burial cementation and compaction destroyed all intergranular porosity, regardless of early diagenetic overprint or textural variables. The reservoir became compartmentalized during burial. Some intervals were active producers of calcium carbonate; others were passive recipients.

[1]  R. Steinen Phreatic and Vadose Diagenetic Modification of Pleistocene Limestone: Petrographic Observations from Subsurface of Barbados, West Indies , 1974 .

[2]  D. Budd,et al.  Geochemical Imprint of Meteoric Diagenesis in Holocene Ooid Sands, Schooner Cays, Bahamas: Correlation of Calcite Cement Geochemistry with Extant Groundwaters , 1990 .

[3]  A. Coogan Measurements Of Compaction in Oolitic Grainstone , 1970 .

[4]  P. Wagner,et al.  Porosity Preservation in the Upper Smackover (Jurassic) Carbonate Grainstone, Walker Creek Field, Arkansas: Response of Paleophreatic Lenses to Burial Processes: REPLY , 1983 .

[5]  A. Tobi,et al.  A chart for judging the reliability of point counting results , 1965 .

[6]  E. Heydari,et al.  Burial diagenesis and thermochemical sulfate reduction, Smackover Formation, southeastern Mississippi salt basin , 1989 .

[7]  R. Matthews Carbonate diagenesis; equilibration of sedimentary mineralogy to the subaerial environment; coral cap of Barbados, West Indies , 1968 .

[8]  R. Maliva Skeletal aragonite neomorphism — quantitative modelling of a two-water diagenetic system , 1998 .

[9]  L. Land PHREATIC VERSUS VADOSE METEORIC DIAGENESIS OF LIMESTONES: EVIDENCE FROM A FOSSIL WATER TABLE , 1970 .

[10]  E. Heydari,et al.  Paleoceanographic and paleoclimatic controls on ooid mineralogy of the Smackover Formation, Mississippi salt basin; implications for Late Jurassic seawater composition , 1994 .

[11]  E. Heydari The Role of Burial Diagenesis in Hydrocarbon Destruction and H2S Accumulation, Upper Jurassic Smackover Formation, Black Creek Field, Mississippi , 1997 .

[12]  Y. Druckman,et al.  Burial Diagenesis and Porosity Evolution, Upper Jurassic Smackover, Arkansas and Louisiana , 1981 .

[13]  Robert L. Folk,et al.  Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks , 1974 .

[14]  N. Pingitore Vadose and Phreatic Diagenesis: Processes, Products and their Recognition in Corals , 1976 .

[15]  D. Budd Aragonite-to-calcite transformation during fresh-water diagenesis of carbonates: Insights from pore-water chemistry , 1988 .

[16]  E. Heydari,et al.  Porosity Loss, Fluid Flow, and Mass Transfer in Limestone Reservoirs: Application to the Upper Jurassic Smackover Formation, Mississippi , 2000 .

[17]  J. Becher,et al.  The Walker Creek Field: A Smackover Diagenetic Trap , 1976 .

[18]  R. Matthews,et al.  Isotope signatures associated with early meteoric diagenesis , 1982 .

[19]  R. Matthews,et al.  Phreatic vs. Vadose Diagenesis: Stratigraphy and Mineralogy of a Cored Borehole on Barbados, W. I. , 1973 .

[20]  R. Clayton,et al.  Oxygen isotope fractionation in divalent metal carbonates , 1969 .

[21]  M. P. Eastman,et al.  The coprecipitation of Sr2+ with calcite at 25°C and 1 atm , 1986 .

[22]  E. Gavish,et al.  Progressive diagenesis in Quaternary to late Tertiary carbonate sediments; sequence and time scale , 1969 .

[23]  W. Dow Kerogen studies and geological interpretations , 1977 .

[24]  C. Moore,et al.  Carbonate Diagenesis and Porosity , 1989 .