Symbolic Action Research in Information Systems: Introduction to the Special Issue

This special issue introduction explores the need to study information systems as symbolic action systems, defines broadly the research domain and related assumptions, notes the origins of this perspective, articulates its key lines of study, and discusses the state of the field in light of published research. The essay also positions the three papers of the special issue in the broader Information Systems (IS) discourse and notes their specific contribution in bridging so far unconnected streams of research and expanding research methods amenable to symbolic action research. This introductory essay furthermore observes some unique challenges in pulling together the special issue that invited the editors to combat against the tendency to approach communicative processes associated with information systems as primarily psychological processes. In closing we note several lines of inquiry that can strengthen future studies of symbolic action including better design theories, more flexible and open use of methods, and attentive use of rich traditions that inform symbolic action research in IS.

[1]  Terry Ryan,et al.  Fostering Quality and Flow of Online Learning Conversations by Artifact-Centered Discourse Systems , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Ping Wang,et al.  Community Learning in Information Technology Innovation , 2009, MIS Q..

[3]  Fernando Flores,et al.  Information technology and the institution of identity: Reflections since Understanding Computers and Cognition , 1998, Inf. Technol. People.

[4]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Toward Ethical Information Systems: The Contribution of Discourse Ethics , 2010, MIS Q..

[5]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  The Spatial, Temporal, and Configurational Characteristics of Geographic Dispersion in Teams , 2007, MIS Q..

[6]  Jörgen Sandberg,et al.  Generating Research Questions Through Problematization , 2011 .

[7]  John Krogstie,et al.  Process models representing knowledge for action: a revised quality framework , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations , 1996, CACM.

[9]  Fahri Yetim,et al.  Acting with genres: discursive-ethical concepts for reflecting on and legitimating genres , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[10]  R. Stamper.  Information in business and administrative systems , 1973 .

[11]  Celia V. Harquail,et al.  Organizational images and member identification. , 1994 .

[12]  Andreas Reckwitz.  Toward a Theory of Social Practices , 2002 .

[13]  B. Latour.  Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory , 2005 .

[14]  G. Goldkuhl.  Information systems actability: Tracing the theoretical roots , 2009 .

[15]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Why the old world cannot publish? Overcoming challenges in publishing high-impact IS research , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  A Critical Assessment of the Bunge-Wand-Weber Ontology for Conceptual Modeling , 2007 .

[17]  Mark Christopher Shaw,et al.  On Quality and Communication: The Relevance of Critical Theory to Health Informatics , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Marko Dragojevic,et al.  Communication Accommodation Theory , 2015 .

[19]  D. Seibold,et al.  Group Argument , 2007 .

[20]  A. F. Salam,et al.  Managerial Interpretations of the Role of Information Systems in Competitive Actions and Firm Performance: A Grounded Theory Investigation , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[21]  Ron Weber,et al.  Editor's comment: still desperately seeking the IT artifact , 2003 .

[22]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  A Rhetorical Approach to IT Diffusion: Reconceptualizing the Ideology-Framing Relationship in Computerization Movements , 2013, MIS Q..

[23]  Stephan Ludwig,et al.  Take Their Word for It: The Symbolic Role of Linguistic Style Matches in User Communities , 2014, MIS Q..

[24]  Tanya V. Bondarouk,et al.  Action-oriented group learning in the implementation of information technologies: results from three case studies , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Complex Mediation , 2005, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[26]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Knowledge Collaboration in Online Communities , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[27]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  A Practice Perspective on Technology-Mediated Network Relations: The Use of Internet-Based Self-Serve Technologies , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[28]  Lucy Suchman.  Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[29]  J. Austin.  How to do things with words , 1962 .

[30]  Ron Weber,et al.  Research Commentary: Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling - A Research Agenda , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  Ambiguity and choice in organizations , 1976 .

[32]  J. Searle.  The Construction of Social Reality , 1997 .

[33]  Susan Gasson,et al.  A genealogical study of boundary-spanning IS design , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[34]  A. Koller,et al.  Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language , 1969 .

[35]  Roman Beck,et al.  Knowledge Exchange and Symbolic Action in Social Media-Enabled Electronic Networks of Practice: A Multilevel Perspective on Knowledge Seekers and Contributors , 2014, MIS Q..

[36]  P. Checkland.  Systems Theory and Management Thinking , 1994 .

[37]  Carol Stoak Saunders,et al.  The Social Construction of Meaning: An Alternative Perspective on Information Sharing , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  Fredrik Karlsson,et al.  Combining method engineering with activity theory: theoretical grounding of the method component concept , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[39]  Andrew Burton-Jones,et al.  From Use to Effective Use: A Representation Theory Perspective , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[40]  João Vieira da Cunha,et al.  A Dramaturgical Model of the Production of Performance Data , 2013, MIS Q..

[41]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Perceived Individual Collaboration Know-How Development Through Information Technology-Enabled Contextualization: Evidence from Distributed Teams , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[42]  Elizabeth J. Davidson,et al.  Technology Frames and Framing: A Socio-Cognitive Investigation of Requirements Determination , 2002, MIS Q..

[43]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design , 1987 .

[44]  Peter Bøgh Andersen,et al.  Activity-based design , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[45]  K. Weick.  The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[46]  Michael Boyer O'Leary,et al.  Beyond Being There: The Symbolic Role of Communication and Identification in Perceptions of Proximity to Geographically Dispersed Colleagues , 2014, MIS Q..

[47]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  Governing Through Technology: Information Artefacts and Social Practice , 2010 .

[48]  Mark Aakhus,et al.  Perpetual Contact: Mobile Communication, Private Talk, Public Performance , 2002 .

[49]  Dennis S. Gouran.  Exploiting the Predictive Potential of Structuration Theory , 1990 .

[50]  W. Orlikowski.  The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations , 2014 .

[51]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Data matters in IS theory building , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[52]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Information Systems Development and Data Modeling: Philosophical Foundations , 1995 .

[54]  Mark Aakhus,et al.  Communication as Design , 2007 .

[55]  Göran Goldkuhl,et al.  Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[56]  P. Leonardi,et al.  What’s Under Construction Here? Social Action, Materiality, and Power in Constructivist Studies of Technology and Organizing , 2010 .

[57]  Boris Wyssusek,et al.  On Ontological Foundations of Conceptual Modelling , 2006, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[58]  Nicholas Berente,et al.  Arguing the Value of Virtual Worlds: Patterns of Discursive Sensemaking of an Innovative Technology , 2011, MIS Q..

[59]  Mark Aakhus,et al.  From Information‐Seeking Behavior to Meaning Engagement Practice. , 2002 .

[60]  Natalia Levina,et al.  Collaborating on Multi-Party Information Systems Development Projects: A Collective Reflection-in-Action View , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[61]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  Rethinking the Meaning of Identifiers in Information Infrastructures , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[62]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Toward a Social Ontology for Conceptual Modeling , 2014, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[63]  Susan V. Scott,et al.  10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization , 2008 .

[64]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Materiality and Change: Challenges to Building Better Theory about Technology and Organizing , 2008, Inf. Organ..

[65]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Action based model of information system , 1986, Inf. Syst..

[66]  Kathryn Aten,et al.  Valuing Virtual Worlds: The Role of Categorization in Technology Assessment , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[67]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 1999 .

[68]  Lorna Heaton,et al.  The Computerization of Work: A Communication Perspective , 2000 .

[69]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  Action-oriented conceptual modelling , 2004, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[70]  Sue Holwell,et al.  Information, Systems and Information Systems: Making Sense of the Field , 1998 .

[71]  Rui Chen,et al.  Data Model Development for Fire Related Extreme Events: An Activity Theory Approach , 2013, MIS Q..

[72]  S. Toulmin.  Return to Reason , 2001 .

[73]  Mark Aakhus,et al.  Becoming More Reflective about the Role of Design in Communication , 2014 .

[74]  Hans Weigand,et al.  Two decades of language/action perspective , 2006 .

[75]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Computing in Everyday Life: A Call for Research on Experiential Computing , 2010, MIS Q..

[76]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Digital materiality? How artifacts without matter, matter , 2010, First Monday.

[77]  Paul Beynon-Davies,et al.  The enactment of significance: a unified conception of information, systems and technology , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[78]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  POSITIONING AND PRESENTING DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH FOR MAXIMUM IMPACT 1 , 2013 .

[79]  Cindy K. Chung,et al.  The Psychological Functions of Function Words , 2007 .

[80]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  ICIS Paper: Implications of Theories of Language for Information Systems , 1985, MIS Q..

[81]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Studying Knowledge Management in Information Systems Resarch: Discourses and Theoretical Assumptions , 2002, MIS Q..

[82]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  Investigating actability dimensions: a language/action perspective on criteria for information systems evaluation , 2004, Interact. Comput..

[83]  Dov Te'eni,et al.  Review: A Cognitive-Affective Model of Organizational Communication for Designing IT , 2001, MIS Q..

[84]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  An integrative semiotic framework for information systems: The social, personal and material worlds , 2014, Inf. Organ..

[85]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (Learning in Doing: Social, , 1987 .

[86]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[87]  Peter Rittgen,et al.  A language-mapping approach to action-oriented development of information systems , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[88]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Critical Realism in Information Systems Research , 2013, MIS Q..