Situated learning theory: adding rate and complexity effects via Kauffman's NK model.

For many firms, producing information, knowledge, and enhancing learning capability have become the primary basis of competitive advantage. A review of organizational learning theory identifies two approaches: (1) those that treat symbolic information processing as fundamental to learning, and (2) those that view the situated nature of cognition as fundamental. After noting that the former is inadequate because it focuses primarily on behavioral and cognitive aspects of individual learning, this paper argues the importance of studying learning as interactions among people in the context of their environment. It contributes to organizational learning in three ways. First, it argues that situated learning theory is to be preferred over traditional behavioral and cognitive learning theories, because it treats organizations as complex adaptive systems rather than mere information processors. Second, it adds rate and nonlinear learning effects. Third, following model-centered epistemology, it uses an agent-based computational model, in particular a "humanized" version of Kauffman's NK model, to study the situated nature of learning. Using simulation results, we test eight hypotheses extending situated learning theory in new directions. The paper ends with a discussion of possible extensions of the current study to better address key issues in situated learning.

[1]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Modeling Organizational Adaptation as a Simulated Annealing Process , 1996 .

[2]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  The New Handbook of Organizational Communication , 2001 .

[3]  James G. Greeno,et al.  Situativity and Symbols: Response to Vera and Simon , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  Joel Podolny A Status-Based Model of Market Competition , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[5]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[6]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Competing on the Edge: Strategy as Structured Chaos , 1998 .

[7]  M. Porter Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[8]  A. Sfard On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One , 1998 .

[9]  Bill McKelvey,et al.  Foundations of “new” social science: Institutional legitimacy from philosophy, complexity science, postmodernism, and agent-based modeling , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  The origins of order , 1993 .

[11]  Richard A. D'Aveni,et al.  Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering , 1994 .

[12]  Irina Trofimova,et al.  Self-Organization and Resource Exchange in EVS Modeling , 2002 .

[13]  S. Guastello,et al.  Origins of Coordination and Team Effectiveness: A Perspective From Game Theory and Nonlinear Dynamics , 1998 .

[14]  Jan W. Rivkin Imitation of Complex Strategies , 2000 .

[15]  Joel A. C. Baum,et al.  Self-Organization, Complexity Catastrophe, and Microstate Models at the Edge of Chaos , 2002 .

[16]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  The social organization of distributed cognition , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[17]  M. Castells The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[18]  R. Stacey The science of complexity: An alternative perspective for strategic change processes , 1995 .

[19]  R. Garud,et al.  Path dependence and creation , 2003 .

[20]  Dennis K. Mumby New Approaches to Organizational Communication , 1994 .

[21]  P. Lehnen,et al.  Phase Transitions , 2021, Computational Statistical Physics.

[22]  L. Argote,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS , 2000 .

[23]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[24]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[25]  T. Fenwick Expanding Conceptions of Experiential Learning: A Review of the Five Contemporary Perspectives on Cognition , 2000 .

[26]  L. Argote Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge , 1999 .

[27]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[28]  B. McKelvey EMERGENT ORDER IN FIRMS: COMPLEXITY SCIENCE vs. THE ENTANGLEMENT TRAP [Published in Complex Systems and Evolutionary Perspectives of Organizations: Applications of Complexity Theory to Organizations, Eve Mitleton-Kelly (ed.), Elsevier, Summer 2002.] , 2002 .

[29]  Kathleen M. Carley STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND LEARNING WITHIN ORGANIZATIONS , 2001 .

[30]  L. Prusak The knowledge advantage , 1996 .

[31]  Joel A. C. Baum Whole-Part Coevolutionary Competition in Organizations , 1999 .

[32]  Guillermo Ricardo Simari,et al.  Multiagent systems: a modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence , 2000 .

[33]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[34]  Daniel A. Levinthal Adaptation on rugged landscapes , 1997 .

[35]  William P. Anthony,et al.  The Influence of Tacit Knowledge and Collective Mind on Strategic Planning , 1998 .

[36]  H. J. Heinz,et al.  LEARNING WITHIN AND AMONG ORGANIZATIONS , 2002 .

[37]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[38]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Communication: An Interdisciplinary Perspective , 1987 .

[39]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[40]  S. Guastello Managing Emergent Phenomena: Nonlinear Dynamics in Work Organizations , 2001 .

[41]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science , 1999, Organization Science.

[42]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994 .

[43]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[44]  D. Stauffer,et al.  Random Boolean networks: Analogy with percolation , 1987 .

[45]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  A PCANS Model of Structure in Organizations , 1998 .

[46]  M. Mazumdar,et al.  Avoiding Complexity Catastrophe in Coevolutionary Pockets: Strategies for Rugged Landscapes , 1999 .

[47]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  Research in the Sociology of Organization. , 1994 .

[48]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Emergence of Communication Networks , 1999 .

[49]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Landscape Design: Designing for Local Action in Complex Worlds , 1999 .

[50]  B. Derrida,et al.  Phase Transitions in Two-Dimensional Kauffman Cellular Automata , 1986 .

[51]  R. Moreland,et al.  Exploring the Performance Benefits of Group Training: Transactive Memory or Improved Communication? , 2000 .

[52]  Andrew M. Colman,et al.  The complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of competition and collaboration , 1998, Complex..

[53]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue: Applications of Complexity Theory to Organization Science , 1999, Organization Science.

[54]  S. Wright,et al.  Evolution in Mendelian Populations. , 1931, Genetics.

[55]  W. Arthur Positive feedbacks in the economy , 1990 .

[56]  Noshir Contractor,et al.  Self-organizing systems perspective in the study of organizational communication , 1994 .

[57]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[58]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Emergent communication networks. , 1987 .

[59]  Kathleen M. Carley On generating hypotheses using computer simulations , 1999 .

[60]  Steven Durlauf,et al.  Growing artificial societies , 1997, Complex.

[61]  P. Paulus,et al.  Idea Generation in Groups : A Basis for Creativity in Organizations , 1994 .

[62]  Paul Duguid,et al.  Chapter 7 – Organizational Learning and Communities of Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation* , 2000 .

[63]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[64]  G. DeSanctis,et al.  Shaping organization form : communication, connection, and community , 1999 .

[65]  D. Gentner,et al.  Avoiding Missed Opportunities in Managerial Life: Analogical Training More Powerful Than Individual Case Training , 2000 .

[66]  R. Punnett,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.

[67]  W. Arthur,et al.  The Economy as an Evolving Complex System II , 1988 .

[68]  Holly Arrow,et al.  Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development, and Adaptation , 2000 .

[69]  Amanat Hussain,et al.  The learning organization , 2000 .

[70]  Beverly J. Moore,et al.  Situated Cognition versus Traditional Cognitive Theories of Learning , 1998 .

[71]  Rob Cross,et al.  Strategic Learning in a Knowledge Economy: Individual, Collective and Organizational Learning Processes , 1999 .

[72]  Joseph F. Porac,et al.  Advances in managerial cognition and organizational information processing , 1994 .

[73]  R. Axelrod,et al.  Harnessing Complexity , 2022, Sync or Swarm, Revised Edition.

[74]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[75]  J. Levine,et al.  Knowledge Transfer in Organizations: Learning from the Experience of Others☆ , 2000 .

[76]  Carol A. Seger,et al.  Implicit learning. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[77]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[78]  Michael J. Prietula,et al.  Computational organization theory , 1994 .

[79]  Stewart L. Tubbs,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Communication. , 1988 .

[80]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  Knowledge emergence : social, technical, and evolutionary dimensions of knowledge creation , 2001 .

[81]  K. Weick,et al.  The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2d ed. , 1980 .

[82]  Edwin Hutchins,et al.  The technology of team navigation , 1990 .

[83]  R. Veliyath Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering , 1996 .

[84]  Gérard Weisbuch,et al.  Complex Systems Dynamics , 1994 .

[85]  Weinberger,et al.  Local properties of Kauffman's N-k model: A tunably rugged energy landscape. , 1991, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[86]  P. Drucker Knowledge-Worker Productivity: The Biggest Challenge , 1999, IEEE Engineering Management Review.