Postulates for revising BDI structures

The process of rationally revising beliefs in the light of new information is a topic of great importance and long-standing interest in artificial intelligence. Moreover, significant progress has been made in understanding the philosophical, logical, and computational foundations of belief revision. However, very little research has been reported with respect to the revision of other mental states, most notably propositional attitudes such as desires and intentions. In this paper, we present a first attempt to formulate a general framework for understanding the revision of mental states. We develop an abstract belief-desire-intention model of agents, and introduce a notion of rationality for this model. We then present a series of formal postulates characterizing the processes of adding beliefs, desires, and intentions, updating costs and values, and removing beliefs, desires, and intentions. We also investigate the computational complexity of several problems involving the abstract model and comment on algorithms for revision.

[1]  Anand S. Rao,et al.  An Abstract Architecture for Rational Agents , 1992, KR.

[2]  Hector J. Levesque,et al.  Intention is Choice with Commitment , 1990, Artif. Intell..

[3]  Aron Gurwitsch Towards a Theory of Intentionality , 1970 .

[4]  W. Salmon,et al.  Knowledge in Flux , 1991 .

[5]  Anand S. Rao,et al.  Modeling Rational Agents within a BDI-Architecture , 1997, KR.

[6]  Michael R. Genesereth,et al.  Logical foundations of artificial intelligence , 1987 .

[7]  Amy L. Lansky,et al.  Reactive Reasoning and Planning , 1987, AAAI.

[8]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  The complexity of contract negotiation , 2005, Artif. Intell..

[9]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Knowledge updates: Semantics and complexity issues , 2005, Artif. Intell..

[10]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Programming Multi-Agent Systems in AgentSpeak using Jason (Wiley Series in Agent Technology) , 2007 .

[11]  Wojciech Jamroga,et al.  Towards a theory of intention revision , 2007, Synthese.

[12]  Marcus J. Huber JAM: a BDI-theoretic mobile agent architecture , 1999, AGENTS '99.

[13]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions , 1985, Journal of Symbolic Logic.

[14]  K. Konolige A deduction model of belief , 1986 .

[15]  Martha E. Pollack,et al.  The Uses of Plans , 1992, Artif. Intell..

[16]  A. S. Roa,et al.  AgentSpeak(L): BDI agents speak out in a logical computable language , 1996 .

[17]  Philip R. Cohen,et al.  Plans as Complex Mental Attitudes , 2003 .

[18]  Peter Gärdenfors,et al.  Knowledge in Flux , 1988 .

[19]  Anand S. Rao,et al.  Decision Procedures for BDI Logics , 1998, J. Log. Comput..

[20]  Yoav Shoham,et al.  Logical Theories of Intention and the Database Perspective , 2009, J. Philos. Log..

[21]  Anand S. Rao,et al.  The Semantics of Intention Maintenance for Rational Agents , 1995, IJCAI.

[22]  Philip R. Cohen,et al.  Intentions in Communication , 1992, Language.

[23]  Anand S. Rao,et al.  AgentSpeak(L): BDI Agents Speak Out in a Logical Computable Language , 1996, MAAMAW.

[24]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Reasoning about rational agents , 2000, Intelligent robots and autonomous agents.