Stumps as fuel

Wood fuels make a key contribution to renewable energy sources in the Nordic countries. The growing demand for forest biomass can be partly met by utilising energy-rich stumps left after clear cutting. As fuel, stump wood is commonly associated with a high presence of contaminants, resulting in high ash content. The concentration of contaminants depends on factors such as soil type, weather conditions, harvesting method, storage duration and other handling operations. The high ash content is a major drawback when using stump wood as fuel. Handling methods that could improve fuel quality are therefore highly desirable. To produce a fuel of acceptable quality, i.e. with low moisture and ash content and high energy value, the above-mentioned factors require evaluation and quantification. In this thesis, various handling methods within the supply chain for Norway spruce stump and their effects on the biomass as fuel are evaluated. The following handling processes are dealt with: harvesting technique, pre-treatments including stump splitting/fractionation and cleaning using vibration or sieving, storage methods and storage duration. Choice of stump harvesting head proved to have an impact on fuel quality, as splitting of stumps during extraction allowed better drying during storage. Such stumps could be stored directly in windrows, since no difference could be established between this method and storage in heaps prior to windrow storage. In general, storage improved fuel quality. Changes in fuel quality parameters do not reflect the whole picture, however, since dry matter losses occur during storage, and therefore the storage period should be kept as short as possible. During winter months, when demands for fuel are highest, stump ash content can be high, since frozen contaminants are difficult to detach from stumps during transport. To achieve acceptable fuel quality during high demand periods, long storage duration or a pre-treatment involving additional stump cleaning is required. Fuel quality was clearly improved by vibration-based cleaning before the comminution of stumps or by sieving stump wood after crushing. These methods can allow stump wood fuel of acceptable quality to be supplied within a harvesting season.

[1]  J. Koppejan,et al.  The Handbook of Biomass Combustion and Co-firing , 2008 .

[2]  T. Nordfjell,et al.  Fuel quality changes during seasonal storage of compacted logging residues and young trees , 2007 .

[3]  Juha Laitila,et al.  Cost and sensitive analysis tools for forest energy procurement chains. , 2006 .

[4]  S. Wert,et al.  Effects of Skid Roads on Diameter, Height, and Volume Growth in Douglas-fir1 , 1981 .

[5]  A. Grelle,et al.  Carbon balance of a forest ecosystem after stump harvest , 2012 .

[6]  J. Vinterbäck,et al.  Proceedings of the World Bioenergy Conference and Exhibition on Biomass for Energy, Jönköping, Sweden, 27-29 May 2008. , 2008 .

[7]  Eva-Lotta Lindholm,et al.  Energy Use and Environmental Impact of Roundwood and Forest Fuel Production in Sweden , 2010 .

[8]  G. Hope Changes in soil properties, tree growth, and nutrition over a period of 10 years after stump removal and scarification on moderately coarse soils in interior British Columbia , 2007 .

[9]  Tryggve Persson Tree stumps for bioenergy – harvesting techniques and environmental consequences , 2012 .

[10]  M. Weber,et al.  The effect of forest floor manipulation on nitrogen status and tree growth in an eastern Ontario jack pine ecosystem , 1985 .

[11]  Ben P. Marchant,et al.  Time–frequency Analysis for Biosystems Engineering , 2003 .

[12]  Douglas L. Godbold,et al.  Stump Harvesting for Bioenergy - A Review of the Environmental Impacts , 2010 .

[13]  Henry A. Froehlich,et al.  Growth of young Pinus ponderosa and Pinus contorta on compacted soil in central Washington , 1986 .

[14]  Rolf Björheden,et al.  Drivers behind the development of forest energy in Sweden , 2006 .

[15]  M. Strömgren,et al.  Soil-CO2 flux after patch scarification, harrowing and stump harvest in a hemi-boreal forest , 2012 .

[16]  M. Curran,et al.  Criteria and guidance considerations for sustainable tree stump harvesting in British Columbia , 2012 .

[17]  Tomas Nordfjell,et al.  Pine and spruce stump harvesting productivity and costs using a Pallari KH 160 stump-lifting tool , 2011 .

[18]  Juha Nurmi,et al.  Heating values of mature trees. , 1997 .

[19]  Regeringen och Regeringskansliet En skogspolitik i takt med tiden , 2008 .

[20]  Raida Jirjis,et al.  Fuel quality of Norway spruce stumps – influence of harvesting technique and storage method , 2011 .

[21]  Riina Antikainen,et al.  Forest bioenergy climate impact can be improved by allocating forest residue removal , 2012 .

[22]  D. Pyatt,et al.  An Experiment in Intensive Cultivation of an Upland Heath , 1984 .

[23]  W. Thies,et al.  Stump removal and fertilization of five Phellinus weirii-infested stands in Washington and Oregon affect mortality and growth of planted Douglas-fir 25 years after treatment , 2005 .

[24]  Antti Asikainen,et al.  Simulation of stump crushing and truck transport of chips , 2010 .

[25]  Tapio Ranta,et al.  The profitability of transporting uncomminuted raw materials in Finland , 2006 .

[26]  D. Zabowski,et al.  Long-term effects of stump removal to control root rot on forest soil bulk density, soil carbon and nitrogen content , 2008 .

[27]  nasa Technology Transfer Report , 2013 .

[28]  E. F. Wass,et al.  Tree Growth for 15 Years Following Stumping in Interior British Columbia , 1999 .

[29]  P. Hakkila Utilization of Residual Forest Biomass , 1989 .