Linguistic typology requires crosslinguistic formal categories

Abstract 1. An important trend in linguistic typology The first paper in the first issue of this journal (Kirby 1997) took on the question of the Keenan-Comrie accessibility hierarchy for relativization (Keenan & Comrie 1977). In a tightly argued presentation, Kirby showed that the effects of the hierarchy fall out from “competition” between two types of complexity. One is the structural complexity of the relative clause, which is calculated in part by counting the number of nodes dominating the trace or pronoun within the NP dominating the relative clause (see Hawkins 1994). The other is morphological complexity, which is calculated in part on the basis of the number of morphemes that need to be processed.

[1]  Edward L. Keenan,et al.  Towards a universal definition of "Subject , 2014 .

[2]  H. Kamp A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation , 2008 .

[3]  M. Haspelmath,et al.  Pre-established categories don't exist: Consequences for language description and typology , 2007 .

[4]  M. Dryer,et al.  The World Atlas of Language Structures , 2005 .

[5]  C. C. Fries The structure of English;: An introduction to the construction of English sentences , 2005 .

[6]  Marianne Mithun,et al.  On the assumption of the sentence as the basic unit of syntactic structure , 2005 .

[7]  Nicholas Evans,et al.  Mundari and argumentation in word-class analysis , 2005 .

[8]  Martin Haspelmath,et al.  The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison , 2003 .

[9]  E. König,et al.  Word order typology , 2001 .

[10]  Randy J. LaPolla,et al.  Syntax: Structure, Meaning, and Function , 1999 .

[11]  M. Dryer Are Grammatical Relations Universal , 1997 .

[12]  G. Murphy On metaphoric representation , 1996, Cognition.

[13]  J. Fodor,et al.  The red herring and the pet fish: why concepts still can't be prototypes , 1996, Cognition.

[14]  Joseph Hawkins,et al.  Argument-predicate structure in grammar and performance: A comparison of English and German , 1995 .

[15]  S. Kemmer The Middle Voice , 1993 .

[16]  M. Dryer The Greenbergian word order correlations , 1992 .

[17]  Matthew S. Dryer,et al.  SVO languages and the OV: VO typology , 1991, Journal of Linguistics.

[18]  David R. Dowty Thematic proto-roles and argument selection , 1991 .

[19]  T. Givón,et al.  Some Substantive Issues Concerning Verb Serialization: Grammatical vs. Cognitive Packaging , 1991 .

[20]  Scott DeLancey,et al.  Event Construal and Case Role Assignment , 1991 .

[21]  B. Comrie Form and function in identifying cases , 1991 .

[22]  Sandra R. Waxman,et al.  Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. George Lakoff . Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987. Pp. xvii + 614. , 1989, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[23]  O. Jaeggli,et al.  The Null Subject Parameter , 1989 .

[24]  Jan Woleński,et al.  Anaphora and Definite Descriptions: Two Applications of Game-Theoretical Semantics , 1988 .

[25]  J. Hawkins,et al.  Prefixing and suffixing universals in relation to basic word order , 1988 .

[26]  Ronald W. Langacker,et al.  Nouns and Verbs , 1987 .

[27]  Brian D. Joseph,et al.  Studies in relational grammar , 1984 .

[28]  John A. Hawkins,et al.  Modifier-head or function-argument relations in phrase structure?: The evidence of some word order universals , 1984 .

[29]  S. Thompson,et al.  Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse , 1980 .

[30]  T. Givón,et al.  On Understanding Grammar , 1979 .

[31]  Mario A. Pei,et al.  Language, Thought and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf , 1957 .

[32]  Z. Harris Methods in structural linguistics. , 1952 .

[33]  E. Keenan,et al.  Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar , 2008 .

[34]  Karin Kipper Schuler,et al.  Argument Realization , 2006, Comput. Linguistics.

[35]  Dik Bakker,et al.  Person marking on adpositions , 2005 .

[36]  Verena Haser,et al.  Metaphor, Metonymy, and Experientialist Philosophy: Challenging Cognitive Semantics , 2005 .

[37]  I. Roberts,et al.  On the role of parameters in universal grammar: a reply to Newmeyer , 2005 .

[38]  D. Davidson Truth and meaning , 2004, Synthese.

[39]  N. Enfield Adjectives in Lao , 2004 .

[40]  Mark C. Baker Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns and Adjectives , 2003 .

[41]  David Gil,et al.  Syntactic Categories, Cross-Linguistic Variation and Universal Grammar , 2000 .

[42]  S. Laurence,et al.  Concepts and Cognitive Science , 1999 .

[43]  I. Davies,et al.  Colours in Tsakhur: First account of the basic colour terms of a Nakh-Daghestanian language , 1999 .

[44]  James Mccloskey Subjecthood and Subject Positions , 1997 .

[45]  S. Kirby,et al.  Competing motivations and emergence: Explaining implicational hierarchies , 1997 .

[46]  Gilles Fauconnier,et al.  Blending as a Central Process of Grammar , 1996 .

[47]  Miriam R. L. Petruck FRAME SEMANTICS , 1996 .

[48]  T. Parsons Thematic relations and arguments , 1995 .

[49]  W. Labov Principles Of Linguistic Change , 1994 .

[50]  Franz Müller-Gotama,et al.  Grammatical Relations: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective on Their Syntax and Semantics , 1994 .

[51]  Jeroen Groenendijk,et al.  Dynamic Montague grammar , 1990 .

[52]  David R. Dowty On the Semantic Content of the Notion of ‘Thematic Role’ , 1989 .

[53]  Sandra A. Thompson,et al.  A discourse approach to the cross-linguistic category ‘Adjective’ , 1989 .

[54]  Anna Siewierska,et al.  Word order rules , 1988 .

[55]  Andrew Pawley,et al.  Encoding events in Kalam and English: different logics for reporting experience , 1987 .

[56]  Peter W. Culicover,et al.  Locality in linguistic theory , 1984 .

[57]  Norbert Hornstein,et al.  Logic as Grammar , 1984 .

[58]  J. Brody Some problems with the concept of basic word order , 1984 .

[59]  David R. Dowty,et al.  Word Meaning and Montague Grammar , 1979 .

[60]  John M. Anderson The Grammar of Case , 1971 .

[61]  W. Goodenough Componential Analysis and the Study of Meaning , 1956 .

[62]  Bernard Bloch A Set of Postulates for Phonemic Analysis , 1948 .