On The Log-Linear Analysis Of Multiple Response Data

Log-linear procedures have been recommended for analyzing data that are in the form of counts or frequencies (Iacobucci and McGill 1990). In its current form, the recommended procedure does not deal with multiple response data (i.e., more than one thought per response category). The paper proposes analytical modifications that researchers need to consider when fitting models with this type of data. The problems and recommended modifications are illustrated with two distinct data sets. The first involves consumers' attribution responses to negative word-of-mouth communication about a brand whereas the second pertains to consumers' cognitive responses toward an advertisement. Results in each case indicate that researchers may generate erroneous conclusions about the significance of estimated parameters if the recommendations are ignored.

[1]  C. W. Park,et al.  Consumer Response to Television Commercials: The Impact of Involvement and Background Music on Brand Attitude Formation , 1986 .

[2]  Dawn Iacobucci,et al.  Analysis of Attribution Data: Theory Testing and Effects Estimation , 1990 .

[3]  R. Laczniak,et al.  RETAIL EQUITY PERCEPTIONS AND CONSUMERS' PROCESSING OF NEGATIVE WORD-OF-MOUTH COMMUNICATION , 1996 .

[4]  James C. McElroy,et al.  Causal Attributions and Expectancy Estimates: A Framework for Understanding the Dynamics of Salesforce Motivation , 1986 .

[5]  R. Rust,et al.  Reliability Measures for Qualitative Data: Theory and Implications , 1994 .

[6]  Marsha L. Richins Word of Mouth Communication As Negative Information , 1984 .

[7]  Paul T. P. Wong,et al.  When people ask "why" questions, and the heuristics of attributional search. , 1981 .

[8]  D. Hilton,et al.  Knowledge-Based Causal Attribution: The Abnormal Conditions Focus Model , 1986 .

[9]  H. Kelley Attribution theory in social psychology , 1967 .

[10]  H. Kelley The processes of causal attribution. , 1973 .

[11]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice , 1976 .

[12]  Robert P. Abelson,et al.  The Strength of Conjunctive Explanations , 1987 .

[13]  Peter Wright Message-Evoked Thoughts: Persuasion Research Using Thought Verbalizations , 1980 .

[14]  Robert P. Abelson,et al.  Conjunctive explanations: When two reasons are better than one. , 1984 .

[15]  H. Kelley Causal schemata and the attribution process , 1972 .

[16]  Denis J. Hilton,et al.  The explanation of occurrences and non-occurrences: A test of the inductive logic model of causal attribution , 1987 .