Normal splenic volumes estimated using three‐dimensional ultrasonography.

The purposes of this study were to determine splenic volumes using three‐dimensional ultrasonography and to compare these measurements with two‐dimensional splenic indices. Fifty‐two healthy volunteers were studied. Two‐dimensional volume measurements were based on length, width, and thickness, and the splenic index was calculated using the standard prolated ellipsoid formula (length x width x thickness x 0.523). Three‐dimensional volume planar measurements were obtained with a slice by slice technique by manually drawing a region of interest around the spleen from one end of the sweep to the opposite end. These measurements were recorded three times by two observers. In addition, in vitro determination of splenic volume was performed using three cadaveric human spleens in a water bath. No statistically significant interobserver or intraobserver variability was present for either two‐dimensional or three dimensional ultrasonography. Three‐dimensional sonographic estimations of planar splenic volumes and ellipsoid splenic volumes were consistently smaller than two‐dimensional sonographic estimations of splenic volumes. Three‐dimensional sonographic splenic volumes calculated in vitro using the planar method were accurate to within 2% of in vitro water displacement volumes. Three‐dimensional ultrasonography is potentially superior to two‐dimensional sonography for evaluation of irregularly shaped objects, such as the spleen, and can provide improved accuracy over that of traditional two‐dimensional techniques.

[1]  R. Markowitz,et al.  Normal splenic size in infants and children: sonographic measurements. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  K. Edgar,et al.  Volume of the spleen in children as measured on CT scans: normal standards as a function of body weight. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  S. Tong,et al.  Accuracy of prostate volume measurements in vitro using three-dimensional ultrasound. , 1996, Academic radiology.

[4]  Eric E. Sauerbrei,et al.  A Practical Guide to Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology , 1987 .

[5]  T. Nelson,et al.  Three‐dimensional ultrasound: accuracy of distance and volume measurements , 1996, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[6]  T. Nelson,et al.  In vivo three‐dimensional sonographic measurement of organ volume: validation in the urinary bladder. , 1996, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[7]  T. Nelson,et al.  Distance and volume measurement using three‐dimensional ultrasonography. , 1995, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[8]  J. W. Beck,et al.  Volume determinations using computed tomography. , 1982, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  R. Castellino,et al.  The spleen in Hodgkin disease: diagnostic value of CT. , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[10]  H. Holm,et al.  Ultrasonic determination of liver and spleem volumes. , 1971, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.

[11]  Y. Morikawa,et al.  Ultrasonographic determination of the splenic size and its clinical usefulness in various liver diseases. , 1975, Radiology.

[12]  Y. Niho,et al.  Sonographic assessment and grading of spleen size , 1991, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[13]  O. Gilja,et al.  In vitro evaluation of three-dimensional ultrasonography in volume estimation of abdominal organs. , 1994, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  F. Bonilla-musoles,et al.  Three-dimensional ultrasound evaluation of ovarian masses. , 1995, Gynecologic oncology.