Subclinical Rejection in Tacrolimus-Treated Renal Transplant Recipients

Background. Subclinical rejection, defined as histologic acute rejection in the absence of graft dysfunction, has been suggested as a cause of chronic allograft rejection. In cyclosporine-treated patients, the incidence of subclinical rejection 3 months after transplant is reported to be approximately 30%. The intent of our study was to determine the incidence of subclinical rejection in tacrolimus-treated renal allograft recipients. Methods. We prospectively studied the incidence of subclinical rejection on surveillance biopsies performed 3 months after transplantation in 114 patients transplanted between September 1, 1998 and November 30, 2000. All patients received tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone, and 56% received antibody induction. Results. Subclinical rejection was detected in 2.6% of patients (3/114, 95% confidence interval 0.5–7.5%). Borderline changes were detected in 11% (12/114). Subclinical rejections were treated with bolus methylprednisolone. Conclusions. The incidence of subclinical rejection early after kidney transplantation is extremely low in tacrolimus-treated patients in whom early rejections are aggressively treated, suggesting that surveillance biopsies may not be necessary with this regimen.

[1]  M. Stegall,et al.  Randomized trial of tacrolimus (Prograf) in combination with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (Neoral) with mycophenolate mofetil after cadaveric kidney transplantation. , 2000, Transplantation.

[2]  P. Nickerson,et al.  Does subclinical rejection contribute to chronic rejection in renal transplant patients? , 1999, Clinical transplantation.

[3]  P. Nickerson,et al.  Effect of increasing baseline immunosuppression on the prevalence of clinical and subclinical rejection: a pilot study. , 1999, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[4]  H. E. Hansen,et al.  The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. , 1999, Kidney international.

[5]  F. Vincenti,et al.  Histopathologic findings from 2-year protocol biopsies from a U.S. multicenter kidney transplant trial comparing tacrolimus versus cyclosporine , 1998 .

[6]  P. Nickerson,et al.  Beneficial effects of treatment of early subclinical rejection: a randomized study. , 1998, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[7]  F. Vincenti,et al.  Histopathologic findings from 2-year protocol biopsies from a U.S. multicenter kidney transplant trial comparing tarolimus versus cyclosporine: a report of the FK506 Kidney Transplant Study Group. , 1998, Transplantation.

[8]  Joshua Miller,et al.  A Comparison Of Tacrolimus (fk506) And Cyclosporine For Immunosuppression After Cadaveric Renal Transplantation1 , 1997 .

[9]  J. Pirsch,et al.  A comparison of tacrolimus (FK506) and cyclosporine for immunosuppression after cadaveric renal transplantation. FK506 Kidney Transplant Study Group. , 1997, Transplantation.

[10]  D. Rush,et al.  Sequential protocol biopsies in renal transplant patients. Clinico-pathological correlations using the Banff schema. , 1995, Transplantation.

[11]  D. Rush,et al.  Sequential protocol biopsies in renal transplant patients: repeated inflammation is associated with impaired graft function at 1 year. , 1995, Transplantation proceedings.

[12]  D. Rush,et al.  Histological findings in early routine biopsies of stable renal allograft recipients. , 1994, Transplantation.