Intertectal connections are not modified by visual experience in developing Hyla moorei

Abstract One eye was rotated in a series of premetamorphic Hyla moorei. After metamorphosis the visuotectal projections were mapped electrophysiologically. In every case both the contralateral and intertectal projections from the rotated eye were themselves rotated and those through the unrotated eye were normal. This shows that the intertectal connections were prefunctionally specified and had not been modified by visual experience. Using the same electrophysiological recording system, a modification of intertectal connections had previously been demonstrated in Xenopus laevis. Other workers found no environmental modification using Rana pipiens but it was unclear whether this represented a species difference between Xenopus and Rana or a difference in recording techniques. The present finding suggests that species differences do exist in terms of the plasticity of intertectal connections between those frogs in which the eyes undergo a considerable change in interocular alignment and those in which this does not occur.

[1]  R. M. Gaze,et al.  Binocular interaction in the formation of specific intertectal neuronal connexions , 1970, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[2]  M. Jacobson Development of neuronal specificity in retinal ganglion cells of Xenopus. , 1968, Developmental biology.

[3]  M. Jacobson,et al.  Development of binocularly driven single units in frogs raised with asymmetrical visual stimulation. , 1974, Experimental neurology.

[4]  M. Keating The time course of experience-dependent synaptic switching of visual connections in Xenopus laevis , 1975, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[5]  P. Grobstein,et al.  Post-metamorphic eye migration in Rana and Xenopus , 1977, Nature.

[6]  M. Jacobson,et al.  THE PROJECTION OF THE BINOCULAR VISUAL FIELD ON THE OPTIC TECTA OF THE FROG , 1962 .

[7]  Roger W. Sperry,et al.  OPTIC NERVE REGENERATION WITH RETURN OF VISION IN ANURANS , 1944 .

[8]  R. M. Gaze,et al.  The appearance, during development, of responses in the optic tectum following visual stimulation of the ipsilateral eye in Xenopus laevis. , 1972, Vision Research.

[9]  M. Keating Evidence for plasticity of intertectal neuronal connections in adult Xenopus. , 1977, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[10]  R. M. Gaze,et al.  The ipsilateral retinotectal pathway in the frog. , 1970, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology and cognate medical sciences.

[11]  H. Hirsch,et al.  Development and maintenance of connectivity in the visual system of the frog. I. The effects of eye rotation and visual deprivation. , 1973, Brain research.

[12]  M. Jacobson Absence of adaptive modification in developing retinotectal connections in frogs after visual deprivation or disparate stimulation of the eyes. , 1971, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  R. M. Gaze,et al.  Binocular interaction and intertectal neuronal connexions: dependence upon developmental stage , 1975, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[14]  K. Straznicky The acquisition of tectal positional specification in Xenopus , 1978, Neuroscience Letters.