Use of an artificial neural network to capture the domain knowledge of a conventional hydraulic simulation model

As part of the POWADIMA research project, this paper describes the technique used to predict the consequences of different control settings on the performance of the water-distribution network, in the context of real-time, near-optimal control. Since the use of a complex hydraulic simulation model is somewhat impractical for real-time operations as a result of the computational burden it imposes, the approach adopted has been to capture its domain knowledge in a far more efficient form by means of an artificial neural network (ANN). The way this is achieved is to run the hydraulic simulation model off-line, with a large number of different combinations of initial tank-storage levels, demands, pump and valve settings, to predict future tank-storage water levels, hydrostatic pressures and flow rates at critical points throughout the network. These input/output data sets are used to train an ANN, which is then verified using testing sets. Thereafter, the ANN is employed in preference to the hydraulic simulation model within the optimization process. For experimental purposes, this technique was initially applied to a small, hypothetical water-distribution network, using EPANET as the hydraulic simulation package. The application to two real networks is described in subsequent papers of this series.

[1]  Marco Franchini,et al.  Conceptual design of a generic, real-time, near-optimal control system for water-distribution networks , 2007 .

[2]  Ken-ichi Funahashi,et al.  On the approximate realization of continuous mappings by neural networks , 1989, Neural Networks.

[3]  Elad Salomons,et al.  Development of a real-time, near-optimal control process for water-distribution networks , 2006 .

[4]  S. Alvisi,et al.  Optimizing the operation of the Valencia water-distribution network , 2006 .

[5]  Annie A. M. Cuyt,et al.  Approximation Theory , 2008, Wiley Encyclopedia of Computer Science and Engineering.

[6]  Yoshifusa Ito,et al.  Approximation of continuous functions on Rd by linear combinations of shifted rotations of a sigmoid function with and without scaling , 1992, Neural Networks.

[7]  B. Coulbeck A review of methodologies for modelling and control of water supply , 1988 .

[8]  Paul Jowitt,et al.  Optimal Pump Scheduling in Water‐Supply Networks , 1992 .

[9]  George G. Lorentz,et al.  The 13-Th Problem of Hilbert , 1997 .

[10]  Z. Rao,et al.  The Use of Neural Networks and Genetic Algorithms for Design of Groundwater Remediation Schemes , 1997 .

[11]  Anthony J. Tarquin,et al.  Optimal Pump Operation in Water Distribution , 1989 .

[12]  Edward K. Blum,et al.  Approximation theory and feedforward networks , 1991, Neural Networks.

[13]  Keith W. Little,et al.  Minimization of Raw Water Pumping Costs Using MILP , 1989 .

[14]  Halbert White,et al.  Connectionist nonparametric regression: Multilayer feedforward networks can learn arbitrary mappings , 1990, Neural Networks.

[15]  D. Sprecher On the structure of continuous functions of several variables , 1965 .

[16]  B. Coulbeck,et al.  A dynamic programming solution to optimization of pumping costs , 1974 .

[17]  L. L. Rogers,et al.  Optimization of groundwater remediation using artificial neural networks with parallel solute transport modeling , 1994 .

[18]  Yoshikane Takahashi,et al.  Generalization and Approximation Capabilities of Multilayer Networks , 1993, Neural Computation.

[19]  Kathy Potosnak,et al.  Conceptual design , 1999, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[20]  Philipp Slusallek,et al.  Introduction to real-time ray tracing , 2005, SIGGRAPH Courses.

[21]  Larry W. Mays,et al.  Battle of the network models: Epilogue , 1987 .

[22]  Elad Salomons,et al.  Optimizing the operation of the Haifa-A water-distribution network , 2007 .

[23]  D. G. Jamieson,et al.  An objective approach to regional wastewater treatment planning , 2002 .