Dynamic scan control in STEM: spiral scans

Scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) has emerged as one of the foremost techniques to analyze materials at atomic resolution. However, two practical difficulties inherent to STEM imaging are: radiation damage imparted by the electron beam, which can potentially damage or otherwise modify the specimen and slow-scan image acquisition, which limits the ability to capture dynamic changes at high temporal resolution. Furthermore, due in part to scan flyback corrections, typical raster scan methods result in an uneven distribution of dose across the scanned area. A method to allow extremely fast scanning with a uniform residence time would enable imaging at low electron doses, ameliorating radiation damage and at the same time permitting image acquisition at higher frame-rates while maintaining atomic resolution. The practical complication is that rastering the STEM probe at higher speeds causes significant image distortions. Non-square scan patterns provide a solution to this dilemma and can be tailored for low dose imaging conditions. Here, we develop a method for imaging with alternative scan patterns and investigate their performance at very high scan speeds. A general analysis for spiral scanning is presented here for the following spiral scan functions: Archimedean, Fermat, and constant linear velocity spirals, which were tested for STEM imaging. The quality of spiral scan STEM images is generally comparable with STEM images from conventional raster scans, and the dose uniformity can be improved.

[1]  Lewys Jones,et al.  Identifying and Correcting Scan Noise and Drift in the Scanning Transmission Electron Microscope , 2013, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[2]  Xiahan Sang,et al.  Revolving scanning transmission electron microscopy: correcting sample drift distortion without prior knowledge. , 2014, Ultramicroscopy.

[3]  R. Egerton,et al.  Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy in the Electron Microscope , 1995, Springer US.

[4]  P. Nellist,et al.  Efficient phase contrast imaging in STEM using a pixelated detector. Part II: optimisation of imaging conditions. , 2015, Ultramicroscopy.

[5]  M. Heel,et al.  Single-particle electron cryo-microscopy: towards atomic resolution , 2000, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[6]  Lewys Jones,et al.  Smart Align—a new tool for robust non-rigid registration of scanning microscope data , 2015, Advanced Structural and Chemical Imaging.

[7]  Arnold Burger,et al.  Flexible metallic nanowires with self-adaptive contacts to semiconducting transition-metal dichalcogenide monolayers. , 2014, Nature nanotechnology.

[8]  Benjamin Berkels,et al.  Picometre-precision analysis of scanning transmission electron microscopy images of platinum nanocatalysts , 2014, Nature Communications.

[9]  L. Carin,et al.  The potential for Bayesian compressive sensing to significantly reduce electron dose in high-resolution STEM images. , 2014, Microscopy.

[10]  Clemens Mangler,et al.  Imaging atomic-level random walk of a point defect in graphene , 2014, Nature Communications.

[11]  S. O. Reza Moheimani,et al.  Spiral-scan Atomic Force Microscopy: A constant linear velocity approach , 2010, 10th IEEE International Conference on Nanotechnology.

[12]  Colin Ophus,et al.  Correcting nonlinear drift distortion of scanning probe and scanning transmission electron microscopies from image pairs with orthogonal scan directions. , 2016, Ultramicroscopy.

[13]  Takashi Taniguchi,et al.  Direct observation of dopant atom diffusion in a bulk semiconductor crystal enhanced by a large size mismatch. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[14]  D. Peckys,et al.  Electron microscopy of whole cells in liquid with nanometer resolution , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Christoph Brune,et al.  Improved accuracy and speed in scanning probe microscopy by image reconstruction from non-gridded position sensor data. , 2013, Nanotechnology.

[16]  Graphene reknits its holes. , 2012, Nano letters.

[17]  K. Novoselov,et al.  Graphene reknits its holes. , 2012, Nano letters.

[18]  Lewys Jones,et al.  Efficient phase contrast imaging in STEM using a pixelated detector. Part 1: experimental demonstration at atomic resolution. , 2015, Ultramicroscopy.

[19]  S Jesse,et al.  Adaptive probe trajectory scanning probe microscopy for multiresolution measurements of interface geometry. , 2009, Nanotechnology.

[20]  P. Galindo,et al.  An approach to the systematic distortion correction in aberration‐corrected HAADF images , 2006, Journal of microscopy.