Automated scoring of dicentric chromosomes differentiates increased radiation sensitivity of young children after low dose CT exposure in vitro

Abstract Purpose: Automated detection of dicentric chromosomes from a large number of cells was applied to study age-dependent radiosensitivity after in vitro CT exposure of blood from healthy donors. Materials and methods: Blood samples from newborns, children (2–5 years) and adults (20–50 years) were exposed in vitro to 0 mGy, 41 mGy and 978 mGy using a CT equipment. In this study, automated scoring based on 13,000–31,000 cells/dose point/age group was performed. Results for control and low dose points were validated by manually counting about 26,000 cells/dose point/age group. Results: For all age groups, the high number of analyzed cells enabled the detection of a significant increase in the frequency of radiation induced dicentric chromosomes in cells exposed to 41 mGy as compared to control cells. Moreover, differences between the age groups could be resolved for the low dose: young donors showed significantly increased risk for induced dicentrics at 41 mGy compared to adults. Conclusions: The results very clearly demonstrate that the automated dicentric scoring method is capable of discerning radiation induced biomarkers in the low dose range (<100 mGy) and thus may open possibilities for large-scale molecular epidemiology studies in radiation protection.

[1]  J F Barquinero,et al.  Automatic scoring of dicentric chromosomes as a tool in large scale radiation accidents. , 2013, Mutation research.

[2]  Madan M. Rehani,et al.  ICRP Publication 121: Radiological Protection in Paediatric Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology , 2013, Annals of the ICRP.

[3]  K. McHugh,et al.  Relationship between paediatric CT scans and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: assessment of the impact of underlying conditions , 2016, British Journal of Cancer.

[4]  G. Reitz,et al.  ICRP Publication 123: Assessment of Radiation Exposure of Astronauts in Space , 2013 .

[5]  I. Hayata,et al.  LOW-COST METAPHASE FINDER SYSTEM , 2010, Health physics.

[6]  J F Barquinero,et al.  Validation of Semi-automatic Scoring of Dicentric Chromosomes after Simulation of Three Different Irradiation Scenarios , 2014, Health physics.

[7]  Gregor Jost,et al.  Dicentric chromosomes and gamma-H2AX foci formation in lymphocytes of human blood samples exposed to a CT scanner: a direct comparison of dose response relationships. , 2009, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[8]  Ruth C. Wilkins,et al.  Interlaboratory Comparison of the Dicentric Chromosome Assay for Radiation Biodosimetry in Mass Casualty Events , 2008, Radiation research.

[9]  C. Beinke,et al.  Laboratory Intercomparison of the Dicentric Chromosome Analysis Assay , 2013, Radiation research.

[10]  D. Blanc.  [What is the dose?]. , 1994, Journal de radiologie.

[11]  L. Walsh,et al.  Enhanced yield of chromosome aberrations after CT examinations in paediatric patients , 2007, International journal of radiation biology.

[12]  D. Brenner,et al.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  D. Lloyd,et al.  An assessment of the metaphase finding capability of the Cytoscan 110. , 1986, Mutation research.

[14]  H. Thierens,et al.  Gene set enrichment analysis highlights different gene expression profiles in whole blood samples X-irradiated with low and high doses , 2013, International journal of radiation biology.

[15]  C. Belka,et al.  Age-dependent differences in DNA damage after in vitro CT exposure , 2018, International journal of radiation biology.

[16]  T. Iwasaki,et al.  The Dose Response of Chromosome Aberrations in Human Lymphocytes Induced In Vitro by Very Low-Dose γ Rays , 2011, Radiation research.

[17]  F. Shishido,et al.  Analysis of chromosome translocation frequency after a single CT scan in adults , 2016, Journal of radiation research.

[18]  Jiang Li,et al.  An automated chromosome aberration scoring system , 1996, Proceedings of Third International Conference on Signal Processing (ICSP'96).

[19]  G. Stephan,et al.  An Automated Chromosome Aberration Scoring System , 1989 .

[20]  T. Yoshizumi,et al.  Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources--1950-2007. , 2009, Radiology.

[21]  F. Shishido,et al.  Increase in dicentric chromosome formation after a single CT scan in adults , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[22]  M. Vrijheid,et al.  EPI-CT: design, challenges and epidemiological methods of an international study on cancer risk after paediatric and young adult CT , 2015, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[23]  Eric Grégoire,et al.  Strategy for Population Triage Based on Dicentric Analysis , 2009, Radiation research.

[24]  F Trompier,et al.  Review of retrospective dosimetry techniques for external ionising radiation exposures. , 2011, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[25]  P. Jeggo,et al.  Ionizing radiation biomarkers in epidemiological studies - An update. , 2017, Mutation research.

[26]  THE MINIMUM DETECTABLE DOSE BY BIODOSIMETRY IN A RADIATION OVEREXPOSURE , 2006 .

[27]  Mikhail Repin,et al.  An automated imaging system for radiation biodosimetry , 2015, Microscopy research and technique.

[28]  Soile Tapio,et al.  Ionizing radiation biomarkers for potential use in epidemiological studies. , 2012, Mutation research.

[29]  T. Lörch,et al.  New developments in automated cytogenetic imaging: unattended scoring of dicentric chromosomes, micronuclei, single cell gel electrophoresis, and fluorescence signals , 2004, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[30]  M G Daker,et al.  Automation in cytogenetics. , 1988, Medical laboratory sciences.

[31]  L. Anderson,et al.  Critical windows of exposure for children's health: cancer in human epidemiological studies and neoplasms in experimental animal models. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.

[32]  J. Tucker,et al.  Differences in Cytogenetic Sensitivity to Ionizing Radiation in Newborns and Adults , 2014, Radiation research.

[33]  Yanxin Li,et al.  Radiation Dose Estimation by Automated Cytogenetic Biodosimetry. , 2016, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[34]  Laurence Roy,et al.  RENEB intercomparisons applying the conventional Dicentric Chromosome Assay (DCA) , 2017, International journal of radiation biology.

[35]  Lisbeth E. Knudsen,et al.  Chromosomal aberration frequency in lymphocytes predicts the risk of cancer: results from a pooled cohort study of 22 358 subjects in 11 countries , 2008, Carcinogenesis.