Invited review: Large-scale indirect measurements for enteric methane emissions in dairy cattle: A review of proxies and their potential for use in management and breeding decisions.

Efforts to reduce the carbon footprint of milk production through selection and management of low-emitting cows require accurate and large-scale measurements of methane (CH4) emissions from individual cows. Several techniques have been developed to measure CH4 in a research setting but most are not suitable for large-scale recording on farm. Several groups have explored proxies (i.e., indicators or indirect traits) for CH4; ideally these should be accurate, inexpensive, and amenable to being recorded individually on a large scale. This review (1) systematically describes the biological basis of current potential CH4 proxies for dairy cattle; (2) assesses the accuracy and predictive power of single proxies and determines the added value of combining proxies; (3) provides a critical evaluation of the relative merit of the main proxies in terms of their simplicity, cost, accuracy, invasiveness, and throughput; and (4) discusses their suitability as selection traits. The proxies range from simple and low-cost measurements such as body weight and high-throughput milk mid-infrared spectroscopy (MIR) to more challenging measures such as rumen morphology, rumen metabolites, or microbiome profiling. Proxies based on rumen samples are generally poor to moderately accurate predictors of CH4, and are costly and difficult to measure routinely on-farm. Proxies related to body weight or milk yield and composition, on the other hand, are relatively simple, inexpensive, and high throughput, and are easier to implement in practice. In particular, milk MIR, along with covariates such as lactation stage, are a promising option for prediction of CH4 emission in dairy cows. No single proxy was found to accurately predict CH4, and combinations of 2 or more proxies are likely to be a better solution. Combining proxies can increase the accuracy of predictions by 15 to 35%, mainly because different proxies describe independent sources of variation in CH4 and one proxy can correct for shortcomings in the other(s). The most important applications of CH4 proxies are in dairy cattle management and breeding for lower environmental impact. When breeding for traits of lower environmental impact, single or multiple proxies can be used as indirect criteria for the breeding objective, but care should be taken to avoid unfavorable correlated responses. Finally, although combinations of proxies appear to provide the most accurate estimates of CH4, the greatest limitation today is the lack of robustness in their general applicability. Future efforts should therefore be directed toward developing combinations of proxies that are robust and applicable across diverse production systems and environments.

[1]  A. Hristov,et al.  Review of current in vivo measurement techniques for quantifying enteric methane emission from ruminants , 2016 .

[2]  H. Soyeurt,et al.  Changes throughout lactation in phenotypic and genetic correlations between methane emissions and milk fatty acid contents predicted from milk mid-infrared spectra. , 2016, Journal of dairy science.

[3]  J. Dijkstra,et al.  Milk metabolome relates enteric methane emission to milk synthesis and energy metabolism pathways. , 2016, Journal of dairy science.

[4]  T. Yan,et al.  Prediction of enteric methane emissions from sheep offered fresh perennial ryegrass () using data measured in indirect open-circuit respiration chambers. , 2016, Journal of animal science.

[5]  I Halachmi,et al.  Review: Milking robot utilization, a successful precision livestock farming evolution. , 2016, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[6]  T. Yan,et al.  Equations to predict methane emissions from cows fed at maintenance energy level in pasture-based systems , 2016 .

[7]  J. Dijkstra,et al.  Prediction of methane emission from lactating dairy cows using milk fatty acids and mid-infrared spectroscopy. , 2016, Journal of the science of food and agriculture.

[8]  J. Lassen,et al.  Heritability estimates for enteric methane emissions from Holstein cattle measured using noninvasive methods. , 2016, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  R. P. McDonnell,et al.  Effect of divergence in phenotypic residual feed intake on methane emissions, ruminal fermentation, and apparent whole-tract digestibility of beef heifers across three contrasting diets. , 2016, Journal of animal science.

[10]  J. Dijkstra,et al.  Relationships between milk fatty acid profiles and enteric methane production in dairy cattle fed grass- or grass silage-based diets , 2016 .

[11]  P. Dardenne,et al.  Milk mid-infrared spectra enable prediction of lactation-stage-dependent methane emissions of dairy cattle within routine population-scale milk recording schemes , 2016 .

[12]  Mick Watson,et al.  Bovine Host Genetic Variation Influences Rumen Microbial Methane Production with Best Selection Criterion for Low Methane Emitting and Efficiently Feed Converting Hosts Based on Metagenomic Gene Abundance , 2016, PLoS genetics.

[13]  P. Dardenne,et al.  Capitalizing on fine milk composition for breeding and management of dairy cows. , 2016, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  P. Chouinard,et al.  Prediction of enteric methane emissions from Holstein dairy cows fed various forage sources. , 2014, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[15]  J. Dijkstra,et al.  Effects of nitrogen fertilisation rate and maturity of grass silage on methane emission by lactating dairy cows. , 2016, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[16]  J. Moorby,et al.  Can live weight be used as a proxy for enteric methane emissions from pasture-fed sheep? , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[17]  N. McEwan,et al.  The Role of Ciliate Protozoa in the Rumen , 2015, Front. Microbiol..

[18]  A. Bannink,et al.  Methane production and diurnal variation measured in dairy cows and predicted from fermentation pattern and nutrient or carbon flow. , 2015, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[19]  J. Moorby,et al.  Does Dietary Mitigation of Enteric Methane Production Affect Rumen Function and Animal Productivity in Dairy Cows? , 2015, PloS one.

[20]  Mick Watson,et al.  The rumen microbial metagenome associated with high methane production in cattle , 2015, BMC Genomics.

[21]  P. B. Pope,et al.  Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[22]  C E F Clark,et al.  Differential rumination, intake, and enteric methane production of dairy cows in a pasture-based automatic milking system. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[23]  M. Kreuzer,et al.  Hot topic: Innovative lactation-stage-dependent prediction of methane emissions from milk mid-infrared spectra. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[24]  V. H. Oddy,et al.  Animal board invited review: genetic possibilities to reduce enteric methane emissions from ruminants , 2015, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[25]  M. Wattiaux,et al.  Feed conversion efficiency in dairy cows: Repeatability, variation in digestion and metabolism of energy and nitrogen, and ruminal methanogens. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[26]  B. Kuhla,et al.  Methyl-coenzyme M reductase A as an indicator to estimate methane production from dairy cows. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[27]  J. Pryce,et al.  Analyzing the heterogeneity of farmers' preferences for improvements in dairy cow traits using farmer typologies. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[28]  M. Kreuzer,et al.  Methane emission, digestive characteristics and faecal archaeol in heifers fed diets based on silage from brown midrib maize as compared to conventional maize , 2015, Archives of animal nutrition.

[29]  E. Okine,et al.  Sustained reduction in methane production from long-term addition of 3-nitrooxypropanol to a beef cattle diet. , 2015, Journal of animal science.

[30]  S. Harrison,et al.  Lambs Fed Fresh Winter Forage Rape (Brassica napus L.) Emit Less Methane than Those Fed Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.), and Possible Mechanisms behind the Difference , 2015, PloS one.

[31]  K. Buckley,et al.  Comparison of feed intake, body weight gain, enteric methane emission and relative abundance of rumen microbes in steers fed sainfoin and lucerne silages under western Canadian conditions , 2015 .

[32]  J. Dijkstra,et al.  Enteric methane production, rumen volatile fatty acid concentrations, and milk fatty acid composition in lactating Holstein-Friesian cows fed grass silage- or corn silage-based diets. , 2015, Journal of dairy science.

[33]  W. Yang,et al.  Effects of isobutyrate supplementation on ruminal microflora, rumen enzyme activities and methane emissions in Simmental steers. , 2015, Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition.

[34]  Toru Tamaki,et al.  A preliminarily study for predicting body weight and milk properties in lactating Holstein cows using a three-dimensional camera system , 2015, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[35]  D. Berry,et al.  Residual feed intake and breeding approaches for enteric methane mitigation , 2015 .

[36]  W. Kneifel,et al.  Effects of fermented and extruded wheat bran on total tract apparent digestibility of nutrients, minerals and energy in growing pigs , 2014 .

[37]  C. Martin,et al.  Influence of rumen protozoa on methane emission in ruminants: a meta-analysis approach. , 2014, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[38]  J. Dijkstra,et al.  Meta-analysis of relationships between enteric methane yield and milk fatty acid profile in dairy cattle. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[39]  E. Okine,et al.  The potential of 3-nitrooxypropanol to lower enteric methane emissions from beef cattle. , 2014, Journal of animal science.

[40]  R. Dewhurst,et al.  Changes in the ratio of tetraether to diether lipids in cattle feces in response to altered dietary ratio of grass silage and concentrates. , 2014, Journal of animal science.

[41]  P. Moate,et al.  Methane emissions of dairy cows cannot be predicted by the concentrations of C8:0 and total C18 fatty acids in milk , 2014 .

[42]  J. Arjan,et al.  Feeding lucerne silage to beef cattle at three allowances and four feeding frequencies affects circadian patterns of methane emissions, but not emissions per unit of intake , 2014 .

[43]  M. Lidauer,et al.  Animal wise Variation in Enteric Methane Output Traits and its Relationship with Feed Efficiency in Dairy Cattle: A Longitudinal Model Analysis , 2014 .

[44]  R. Herd,et al.  Genetic Variation for Methane Traits in Beef Cattle , 2014 .

[45]  C. E. van Middelaar,et al.  Methods to determine the relative value of genetic traits in dairy cows to reduce greenhouse gas emissions along the chain. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[46]  J. Hyslop,et al.  Archaeal abundance in post-mortem ruminal digesta may help predict methane emissions from beef cattle , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[47]  Siva Ganesh,et al.  Two Different Bacterial Community Types Are Linked with the Low-Methane Emission Trait in Sheep , 2014, PloS one.

[48]  Ermias Kebreab,et al.  Prediction of enteric methane emissions from cattle , 2014, Global change biology.

[49]  Dongwan D. Kang,et al.  Methane yield phenotypes linked to differential gene expression in the sheep rumen microbiome , 2014, Genome research.

[50]  R. Dewhurst,et al.  Using archaeol to investigate the location of methanogens in the ruminant digestive tract , 2014 .

[51]  W P Weiss,et al.  Invited review: Enteric methane in dairy cattle production: quantifying the opportunities and impact of reducing emissions. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[52]  Y. Sun,et al.  The effects of feeding 3-nitrooxypropanol on methane emissions and productivity of Holstein cows in mid lactation. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[53]  C. E. van Middelaar,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of feeding strategies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from dairy farming. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[54]  A. Hristov,et al.  Livestock methane emissions in the United States , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  M. De Marchi,et al.  Invited review: Mid-infrared spectroscopy as phenotyping tool for milk traits. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[56]  Consequences of Selection for Environmental Impact Traits in Dairy Cows , 2014 .

[57]  M. McGee,et al.  Methane emissions, body composition, and rumen fermentation traits of beef heifers differing in residual feed intake. , 2013, Journal of animal science.

[58]  R. Dewhurst,et al.  Technical note: Comparison of biomarker and molecular biological methods for estimating methanogen abundance. , 2013, Journal of animal science.

[59]  P. Gerber,et al.  Special topics--Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: III. A review of animal management mitigation options. , 2013, Journal of animal science.

[60]  P. Gerber,et al.  Special topics--Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options. , 2013, Journal of animal science.

[61]  V. H. Oddy,et al.  Low-methane yield sheep have smaller rumens and shorter rumen retention time , 2013, British Journal of Nutrition.

[62]  I.J.M. de Boer,et al.  Evaluation of a feeding strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from dairy farming: The level of analysis matters , 2013 .

[63]  T. Brown-Brandl,et al.  Enteric methane production from beef cattle that vary in feed efficiency. , 2013, Journal of animal science.

[64]  B. Hayes,et al.  Metagenomic Predictions: From Microbiome to Complex Health and Environmental Phenotypes in Humans and Cattle , 2013, PloS one.

[65]  B. Hayes,et al.  Investigating the effect of two methane-mitigating diets on the rumen microbiome using massively parallel sequencing. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[66]  P. Dardenne,et al.  Prediction of the individual enteric methane emission of dairy cows from milk mid-infrared spectra , 2013 .

[67]  C J Rutten,et al.  Invited review: sensors to support health management on dairy farms. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[68]  P. Huhtanen,et al.  Development of equations for predicting methane emissions from ruminants. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[69]  Michael E Goddard,et al.  The future of livestock breeding: genomic selection for efficiency, reduced emissions intensity, and adaptation. , 2013, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[70]  M. Goddard,et al.  Accelerating improvement of livestock with genomic selection. , 2013, Annual review of animal biosciences.

[71]  A. Spang,et al.  Methylotrophic methanogenic Thermoplasmata implicated in reduced methane emissions from bovine rumen , 2013, Nature Communications.

[72]  M. Calus,et al.  Predicted accuracy of and response to genomic selection for new traits in dairy cattle. , 2013, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[73]  R. Dewhurst,et al.  Assessment of archaeol as a molecular proxy for methane production in cattle. , 2013, Journal of dairy science.

[74]  G. Waghorn,et al.  Effects of feed intake on enteric methane emissions from sheep fed fresh white clover (Trifolium repens) and perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) forages , 2013 .

[75]  J. McEwan,et al.  Heritability estimates of methane emissions from sheep , 2013, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[76]  R. Herd,et al.  Phenotypic associations between methane production traits, volatile fatty acids and animal breeding traits. , 2013 .

[77]  R. Herd,et al.  Preliminary genetic parameters for methane production in Australian beef cattle. , 2013 .

[78]  H. Steinfeld,et al.  Tackling climate change through livestock : a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities , 2013 .

[79]  P. Dardenne,et al.  Potential use of milk mid-infrared spectra to predict individual methane emission of dairy cows. , 2012, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[80]  T. Shinkai,et al.  Mitigation of methane production from cattle by feeding cashew nut shell liquid. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[81]  J. Goopy,et al.  Triiodothyronine influences digesta kinetics and methane yield in sheep , 2012 .

[82]  T. Yan,et al.  Comparison of the sulfur hexafluoride tracer and respiration chamber techniques for estimating methane emissions and correction for rectum methane output from dairy cows. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[83]  D. Weary,et al.  Rumination and its relationship to feeding and lying behavior in Holstein dairy cows. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[84]  J. Craigon,et al.  Variation among individual dairy cows in methane measurements made on farm during milking. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[85]  V. Fievez,et al.  Milk odd- and branched-chain fatty acids as biomarkers of rumen function—An update , 2012 .

[86]  K. Beauchemin,et al.  Prediction of enteric methane output from milk fatty acid concentrations and rumen fermentation parameters in dairy cows fed sunflower, flax, or canola seeds. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[87]  M P L Calus,et al.  Genetic parameters for predicted methane production and potential for reducing enteric emissions through genomic selection. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[88]  D. Morgavi,et al.  Rumen protozoa and methanogenesis: not a simple cause–effect relationship , 2011, British Journal of Nutrition.

[89]  G. Russell,et al.  The effect of improving cow productivity, fertility, and longevity on the global warming potential of dairy systems. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[90]  K. Beauchemin,et al.  Can enteric methane emissions from ruminants be lowered without lowering their production , 2011 .

[91]  Ermias Kebreab,et al.  Rumen stoichiometric models and their contribution and challenges in predicting enteric methane production , 2011 .

[92]  J. Dijkstra,et al.  A model of enteric fermentation in dairy cows to estimate methane emission for the Dutch National Inventory Report using the IPCC Tier 3 approach , 2011 .

[93]  F. Jones,et al.  Methane emissions from grazing Angus beef cows selected for divergent residual feed intake , 2011 .

[94]  J. Dijkstra,et al.  Relationships between methane production and milk fatty acid profiles in dairy cattle , 2011 .

[95]  H. Clark,et al.  Chloroform decreases rumen methanogenesis and methanogen populations without altering rumen function , 2011 .

[96]  B. Baets,et al.  Relationships between odd- and branched-chain fatty acid profiles in milk and calculated enteric met , 2011 .

[97]  D. Morgavi,et al.  Effect of fibre- and starch-rich finishing diets on methanogenic Archaea diversity and activity in t , 2011 .

[98]  K. Beauchemin,et al.  Differing effects of 2 active dried yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) strains on ruminal acidosis and methane production in nonlactating dairy cows. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[99]  P. Dardenne,et al.  Mid-infrared prediction of bovine milk fatty acids across multiple breeds, production systems, and countries. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[100]  J. France,et al.  Evaluation of enteric methane prediction equations for dairy cows used in whole farm models , 2010 .

[101]  J. Dijkstra,et al.  Nitrate and sulfate: Effective alternative hydrogen sinks for mitigation of ruminal methane production in sheep. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[102]  G. Berndes,et al.  How much land is needed for global food production under scenarios of dietary changes and livestock productivity increases in 2030 , 2010 .

[103]  C. Martin,et al.  Microbial ecosystem and methanogenesis in ruminants. , 2010, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[104]  D. C. Patterson,et al.  Mitigation of enteric methane emissions through improving efficiency of energy utilization and productivity in lactating dairy cows. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[105]  R. Evershed,et al.  Archaeol – a biomarker for foregut fermentation in modern and ancient herbivorous mammals? , 2010 .

[106]  C. Martin,et al.  Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale. , 2010, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[107]  D. Moran,et al.  Developing breeding schemes to assist mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions. , 2010, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[108]  R. Cullen,et al.  Estimating values of environmental impacts of dairy farming in New Zealand , 2009 .

[109]  K. Beauchemin,et al.  Dietary mitigation of enteric methane from cattle. , 2009 .

[110]  C. Martin,et al.  Milk fatty acids in dairy cows fed whole crude linseed, extruded linseed, or linseed oil, and their relationship with methane output. , 2009, Journal of dairy science.

[111]  T. Yan,et al.  Prediction of methane emission from beef cattle using data measured in indirect open-circuit respiration calorimeters. , 2009, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[112]  D. C. Patterson,et al.  Prediction of body weight and empty body composition using body size measurements in lactating dairy cows , 2009 .

[113]  R. Cady,et al.  The environmental impact of dairy production: 1944 compared with 2007. , 2009, Journal of animal science.

[114]  D. C. Patterson,et al.  Prediction of empty body weight and composition from live weight and other live animal measurements in lactating dairy cows , 2009, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[115]  P. Gerber,et al.  Worldwide growth of animal production and environmental consequences. , 2009 .

[116]  M. Kreuzer,et al.  Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: A review , 2008 .

[117]  S. Denman,et al.  Quantitation and diversity analysis of ruminal methanogenic populations in response to the antimethanogenic compound bromochloromethane. , 2007, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[118]  P. Amer,et al.  An approach to derive economic weights in breeding objectives using partial profile choice experiments. , 2007, Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience.

[119]  E. Okine,et al.  Prediction of methane production from dairy and beef cattle. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[120]  J. Goopy,et al.  Cattle selected for lower residual feed intake have reduced daily methane production. , 2007, Journal of animal science.

[121]  F. Miglior,et al.  Genetic analysis of milk urea nitrogen and lactose and their relationships with other production traits in Canadian Holstein cattle. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[122]  K. Lassey,et al.  Livestock methane emission: From the individual grazing animal through national inventories to the global methane cycle , 2007 .

[123]  P. Faverdin,et al.  Composition of milk fat from cows selected for milk fat globule size and offered either fresh pasture or a corn silage-based diet. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[124]  V. Fievez,et al.  Factors affecting odd- and branched-chain fatty acids in milk: A review , 2006 .

[125]  J. France,et al.  Estimation of the stoichiometry of volatile fatty acid production in the rumen of lactating cows. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[126]  S. Moore,et al.  Relationships of feedlot feed efficiency, performance, and feeding behavior with metabolic rate, methane production, and energy partitioning in beef cattle. , 2006, Journal of animal science.

[127]  S. Biffani,et al.  Developing a genetic evaluation for fertility using angularity and milk yield as correlated traits , 2005 .

[128]  Stefan Schouten,et al.  Temperature-dependent variation in the distribution of tetraether membrane lipids of marine Crenarchaeota: Implications for TEX86 paleothermometry , 2004 .

[129]  J. France,et al.  Alternative approaches to predicting methane emissions from dairy cows. , 2003, Journal of animal science.

[130]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Genetic evaluations of dairy bulls for daughter energy balance profiles using linear type scores and body condition score analyzed using random regression. , 2003, Journal of dairy science.

[131]  C. Pinares-Patiño,et al.  Rumen function and digestion parameters associated with differences between sheep in methane emissions when fed chaffed lucerne hay , 2003, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[132]  N. Asanuma,et al.  Ability of Selenomonas ruminantium, Veillonella parvula, and Wolinella succinogenes to Reduce Nitrate and Nitrite with Special Reference to the Suppression of Ruminal Methanogenesis , 2002 .

[133]  T. Yan,et al.  Impact of recent research on energy feeding systems for dairy cattle , 2000 .

[134]  T. Yan,et al.  Prediction of methane energy output in dairy and beef cattle offered grass silage-based diets , 2000 .

[135]  M. Doreau,et al.  Ruminant milk fat plasticity: nutritional control of saturated, polyunsaturated, trans and conjugated fatty acids , 2000 .

[136]  A. R. Moss,et al.  Methane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming , 2000 .

[137]  R. Hegarty Reducing rumen methane emissions through elimination of rumen protozoa , 1999 .

[138]  Geoff Simm,et al.  Genetic Improvement of Cattle and Sheep , 1998 .

[139]  J. Russell,et al.  The effect of pH on ruminal methanogenesis , 1996 .

[140]  M. Kirchgessner,et al.  Nutritional factors for the quantification of methane production. , 1995 .

[141]  S. Ohta,et al.  Structure-antibacterial activity relationships of anacardic acids , 1993 .

[142]  J. France,et al.  Simulation of nutrient digestion, absorption and outflow in the rumen: model description. , 1992, The Journal of nutrition.

[143]  J. B. Holter,et al.  Methane prediction in dry and lactating Holstein cows. , 1992, Journal of dairy science.

[144]  M. Ryle,et al.  Energy nutrition in ruminants , 1990 .

[145]  E. Okine,et al.  Effects of changes in frequency of reticular contractions on fluid and particulate passage rates in cattle. , 1989, Journal of animal science.

[146]  Montague W. Demment,et al.  A Nutritional Explanation for Body-Size Patterns of Ruminant and Nonruminant Herbivores , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[147]  R. C. Campling,et al.  Variation among pregnant, non‐lactating dairy cows in eating and ruminating behaviour, digestibility and voluntary intake of hay , 1985 .

[148]  Ingram Olkin Range restrictions for product-moment correlation matrices , 1981 .

[149]  R M Murray,et al.  Rates of production of methane in the rumen and large intestine of sheep , 1976, British Journal of Nutrition.

[150]  J. Clapperton,et al.  Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants , 1965, British Journal of Nutrition.