On the kinematic coupling of 1D and 3D finite elements: a structural model

In most framed structures the nonlinearities and the damages are localized, extending over a limited length of the structural member. In order to capture the details of the local damage, the segments of a member that have entered the nonlinear range may need to be analyzed using the three-dimensional element (3D) model whereas the rest of the member can be analyzed using the simpler one-dimensional (1D) element model with fewer degrees of freedom. An Element-Coupling model was proposed to couple the small scale solid 3D elements with the large scale 1D beam elements. The mixed dimensional coupling is performed imposing the kinematic coupling hypothesis of the 1D model on the interfaces of the 3D model. The analysis results are compared with test results of a reinforced concrete pipe column and a structure consisting of reinforced concrete columns and a steel space truss subjected to static and dynamic loading. This structure is a reduced scale model of a direct air-cooled condenser support platform built in a thermal power plant. The reduction scale for the column as well as for the structure was 1:8. The same structures are also analyzed using 3D solid elements for the entire structure to demonstrate the validity of the Element-Coupling model. A comparison of the accuracy and the computational effort indicates that by the proposed Element-Coupling method the accuracy is almost the same but the computational effort is significantly reduced.

[1]  Fujiu Ke,et al.  Multiscale coupling in complex mechanical systems , 2004 .

[2]  Cecil G. Armstrong,et al.  Mixed Dimensional Coupling in Finite Element Stress Analysis , 2002, Engineering with Computers.

[3]  H.A.W. Cornelissen,et al.  Uniaxial tensile fatigue failure of concrete under constant-amplitude and programme loading , 1984 .

[4]  E. Oñate,et al.  A plastic-damage model for concrete , 1989 .

[5]  Gerardo M. Verderame,et al.  A fibre model for push-over analysis of underdesigned reinforced concrete frames , 2006 .

[6]  Alex H. Barbat,et al.  Two-scale approach for the nonlinear dynamic analysis of RC structures with local non-prismatic parts , 2008 .

[7]  Yi Yu,et al.  Multi-scale numerical analysis on dynamic response and local damage in long-span bridges , 2007 .

[8]  Osvaldo L. Manzoli,et al.  Two-dimensional modeling of material failure in reinforced concrete by means of a continuum strong discontinuity approach , 2008 .

[9]  Jeeho Lee,et al.  Plastic-Damage Model for Cyclic Loading of Concrete Structures , 1998 .

[10]  G. Kuhn,et al.  Automatic coupling of a boundary element code with a commercial finite element system , 2008, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[11]  Cecil Armstrong,et al.  Mixed‐dimensional coupling in finite element models , 2000 .

[12]  Günther Kuhn,et al.  Mixed-dimensional, symmetric coupling of FEM and BEM , 2003 .

[13]  Ho-Soo Kim,et al.  Formulation of transition elements for the analysis of coupled wall structures , 1995 .

[14]  Herbert A. Mang,et al.  A new method for the coupling of finite element and boundary element discretized subdomains of elastic bodies , 1986 .

[15]  R. de Borst,et al.  Some observations on embedded discontinuity models , 2001 .

[16]  Antonio Tralli,et al.  A hybrid stress-assumed transition element for solid-to-beam and plate-to-beam connections , 2002 .

[17]  Sherif El-Tawil,et al.  Nonlinear Analysis of Steel-Concrete Composite Structures: State of the Art , 2004 .