Effect of processing conditions on the microstructure, porosity, and mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V repair fabricated by directed energy deposition

Abstract In this study, the effect of processing parameters in directed energy deposition (DED) additive manufacturing (AM) on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V was evaluated. A commercial DED system was used to deposit square patches of Ti-6Al-4V onto a substrate with the same nominal composition, with varying conditions to represent those that may be found in actual repair applications. A design of experiments was used to study the effect of substrate thickness, interlayer dwell time (time between deposition of subsequent layers), initial substrate temperature, hatch pattern, and number of deposited layers on the microstructure, porosity, and hardness of the deposition. Varying these processing parameters elucidates how each independently, or all collectively, impact the resulting microstructure and properties of Ti-6Al-4V deposits. As internal pores, or defects, significantly affect the properties of additively manufactured components, this study aimed to identify and quantify those defects in DED. The results from the current study show that with decreasing substrate thickness, the depth of the heat affected zone increased by an average of 400 μm. The density of the part was affected by the number of deposited layers and the initial substrate temperature, increasing with increasing the number of deposited layers, but decreasing with higher initial substrate temperatures. Lastly, the hardness increased with increasing substrate thickness, but was not impacted significantly by the other parameters studied.

[1]  Z. M. Wang,et al.  Titanium alloys and their machinability—a review , 1997 .

[2]  Eckhard Beyer,et al.  Laser Beam Build-Up Welding: Precision in Repair, Surface Cladding, and Direct 3D Metal Deposition , 2007 .

[3]  Todd Palmer,et al.  Anisotropic tensile behavior of Ti-6Al-4V components fabricated with directed energy deposition additive manufacturing , 2015 .

[4]  Giovanni Straffelini,et al.  Dry sliding wear mechanisms of the Ti6Al4V alloy , 1997 .

[5]  S. Kelly,et al.  Microstructural evolution in laser-deposited multilayer Ti-6Al-4V builds: Part I. Microstructural characterization , 2004 .

[6]  Shuai Shao,et al.  Understanding the Microstructure Formation of Ti-6Al-4V During Direct Laser Deposition via In-Situ Thermal Monitoring , 2016, JOM.

[7]  E. Garboczi,et al.  Porosity Measurements and Analysis for Metal Additive Manufacturing Process Control , 2014, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

[8]  Ma Qian,et al.  Additive manufacturing of strong and ductile Ti–6Al–4V by selective laser melting via in situ martensite decomposition , 2015 .

[9]  S. L. Semiatin,et al.  Microstructure and texture evolution during solidification processing of Ti–6Al–4V , 2003 .

[10]  H. Fraser,et al.  Effects of process variables and size-scale on solidification microstructure in beam-based fabrication of bulky 3D structures , 2009 .

[11]  Abdalla R. Nassar,et al.  Effect of Substrate Thickness and Preheating on the Distortion of Laser Deposited Ti–6Al–4V , 2018 .

[12]  A. Nassar,et al.  Impact of directed energy deposition parameters on mechanical distortion of laser deposited Ti-6Al-4V , 2016 .

[13]  A. Nassar,et al.  Effect of directed energy deposition processing parameters on laser deposited Inconel® 718: Microstructure, fusion zone morphology, and hardness , 2017 .

[14]  Marleen Rombouts,et al.  Material Properties of Ti6Al4 V Parts Produced by Laser Metal Deposition , 2012 .

[15]  William D. Callister,et al.  Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction , 1985 .

[16]  A. Nassar,et al.  Effect of directed energy deposition processing parameters on laser deposited Inconel® 718: External morphology , 2017 .

[17]  A. Mertens,et al.  Laser cladding as repair technology for Ti–6Al–4V alloy: Influence of building strategy on microstructure and hardness , 2015 .

[18]  Jing Liang,et al.  Microstructures of laser-deposited Ti–6Al–4V , 2004 .

[19]  M. Donachie Titanium: A Technical Guide , 1988 .

[20]  A. Nassar,et al.  Intra-layer closed-loop control of build plan during directed energy additive manufacturing of Ti–6Al–4V , 2015 .

[21]  J. Mei,et al.  Influence of position and laser power on thermal history and microstructure of direct laser fabricated Ti–6Al–4V samples , 2005 .

[22]  N. Shamsaei,et al.  Mechanical Properties and Microstructural Features of Direct Laser-Deposited Ti-6Al-4V , 2015 .

[23]  M. Brandt,et al.  In situ tailoring microstructure in additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V for superior mechanical performance , 2017 .

[24]  S. L. Semiatin,et al.  The effect of laser power and traverse speed on microstructure, porosity, and build height in laser-deposited Ti-6Al-4V , 2000 .

[25]  S. Kelly,et al.  Microstructural Study of Laser Formed Ti-6Al-4V , 2000 .

[26]  W. Wang,et al.  Component repair using laser direct metal deposition , 2007 .

[27]  J. Kruth,et al.  A study of the microstructural evolution during selective laser melting of Ti–6Al–4V , 2010 .

[28]  Robert P. Mudge,et al.  Laser engineered net shaping advances additive manufacturing and repair , 2007 .

[29]  S. L. Semiatin,et al.  The laser additive manufacture of Ti-6Al-4V , 2001 .

[30]  G. Lütjering Influence of processing on microstructure and mechanical properties of (α+β) titanium alloys , 1998 .