Future‐focussed thinking: combining scenario planning with decision analysis

This paper first describes current practice in decision analysis and argues that nothing in the technique's application is likely to challenge the strategic decision maker's current worldview of the course of future events that are modelled in the decision tree. By contrast, a scenario planning intervention in an organization has the potential to increase perceived threat and thus lead to a step change in strategic decision making. Strategic decisions are made against a backcloth of the operation of psychological processes that act, it is argued, to reduce the perceived level of environmental threat and result in strategic inertia. For this reason, it is recommended that scenario planning should be adopted as a standard procedure because of its ability to challenge individual and organizational worldviews. The use of scenario planning prior to conventional decision analysis is termed as ‘future-focussed thinking’, and parallels are drawn between the current advocated approach and that of Keeney's value-focussed thinking. Both serve to prompt the creation of enhanced options for subsequent evaluation by conventional decision analytic techniques. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Charles R. Schwenk Cognitive simplification processes in strategic decision‐making , 1984 .

[2]  Ward Edwards,et al.  Conservatism in Complex Probabilistic Inference , 1966 .

[3]  C. Lindblom THE SCIENCE OF MUDDLING THROUGH , 1959 .

[4]  A. H. Murphy,et al.  Experiments in the laboratory and the real world , 1973 .

[5]  Danny Miller,et al.  Momentum and Revolution in Organizational Adaptation , 1980 .

[6]  Paul Slovic,et al.  From Shakespeare to Simon: speculations--and some evidence-- about man's ability to process information , 1972 .

[7]  C Leake,et al.  Decision Analysis for Management Judgement (2nd Edn) , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[8]  H. Thomas,et al.  Competitive Groups as Cognitive Communities: The Case of Scottish Knitwear Manufacturers Revisited , 1989 .

[9]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[10]  George Wright,et al.  Rethinking value elicitation for personal consequential decisions , 1999 .

[11]  Jeffrey Z. Rubin,et al.  Experimental research on third-party intervention in conflict: toward some generalizations. , 1980, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  Howard Thomas,et al.  STRATEGIC RENEWAL AND THE INTERACTION OF CUMULATIVE STRESS AND INERTIA , 1992 .

[13]  Helga Drummond,et al.  Escalation in organizational decision making a case of recruiting an incompetent employee , 1994 .

[14]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Feature Article - Decision Analysis: An Overview , 1982, Oper. Res..

[15]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Commitment to a Policy Decision: A Multi-Theoretical Perspective. , 1978 .

[16]  J. Klayman,et al.  Confirmation, Disconfirmation, and Informa-tion in Hypothesis Testing , 1987 .

[17]  Won-Woo Park,et al.  A Review of research on Groupthink , 1990 .

[18]  Lutz E. Schlange Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation , 1997 .

[19]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[20]  Paul C. Burnett,et al.  The Melbourne Decision-Making Questionnaire : an instrument for measuring patterns for coping with decisional conflict , 1997 .

[21]  G. Pitz,et al.  Sequential effects in the revision of subjective probabilities. , 1967, Canadian journal of psychology.

[22]  P. Barr,et al.  Cognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal , 1992 .

[23]  Nigel Harvey,et al.  Context-Sensitive Heuristics in Statistical Reasoning , 1993 .

[24]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Fault trees: Sensitivity of estimated failure probabilities to problem representation. , 1978 .

[25]  L. Phillips A theory of requisite decision models , 1984 .

[26]  R. J. House,et al.  Organizations: A Quantum View , 1984 .

[27]  G. Hodgkinson,et al.  Cognitive Inertia in a Turbulent Market: The Case of UK Residential Estate Agents , 1997 .

[28]  P. Schoemaker MULTIPLE SCENARIO DEVELOPMENT: ITS CONCEPTUAL AND BEHAVIORAL FOUNDATION , 1993 .

[29]  W. Edwards,et al.  Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research , 1986 .

[30]  Enzer Delphi and cross-impact techniques , 1971 .

[31]  Danny Miller,et al.  SOURCES AND CONSEQUENCES OF COMPETITIVE INERTIA: A STUDY OF THE U.S. AIRLINE INDUSTRY. , 1994 .

[32]  M. Bazerman,et al.  Escalation of commitment in individual and group decision making , 1984 .

[33]  A. Tversky,et al.  Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment , 1983 .

[34]  Yacov Y. Haimes,et al.  Hierarchical Holographic Modeling , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.