Assessment and Treatment of Severe Pancreatitis

From the theoretical point of view, antiproteolytic therapy would seem to be the rationale for acute pancreatitis management. Unfortunately, clinical human trials studying the role of antiproteases in the treatment of acute pancreatitis differ in several respects in terms of their basic design. As a consequence, any form of homogeneous analysis of the reported data as a whole is impossible. Considering the data emerging from a meta-analysis of five trials a rational use of antiproteases may result in a reduction of complications requiring surgery and of patient management costs only in selected cases, meaning by that severe and necrotic forms. As regards presumptive applications, over 400 patients were prospectively tested versus placebo in a double-blind trial with the aim of preventing acute pancreatitis after ERCP. The complication incidence was significantly lower among the pretreated patients; anyway, also in this field of protease inhibitor clinical application it is necessary to identify the patients with the greatest risk to develop post-ERCP acute pancreatitis. In conclusion, antiproteases can still play a role when given prophylactically or when used in the very early phases of the disease; moreover a ‘multiple drugs approach’ (including, for example, suitable antibiotics) seems to represent nowadays the most modern and rational treatment of acute pancreatitis.

[1]  J. Barkin,et al.  Gabexate for the prevention of pancreatic damage related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. , 1997, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[2]  S. Matsuno,et al.  Continuous regional arterial infusion of protease inhibitor and antibiotics in acute necrotizing pancreatitis. , 1996, American journal of surgery.

[3]  G. Manes,et al.  Nonsurgical Treatment of Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis , 1996, Pancreas.

[4]  C. Bassi,et al.  Effectiveness of gabexate mesilate in acute pancreatitis. A metaanalysis. , 1995, Digestive diseases and sciences.

[5]  T. Yoshida Gabexate mesilate in human acute pancreatitis. , 1993, Gastroenterology.

[6]  C. Bassi,et al.  Gabexate mesilate vs aprotinin in human acute pancreatitis (GA.ME.P.A.) , 1993, International journal of pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology.

[7]  A. Warshaw,et al.  Damage prevention versus damage control in acute pancreatitis. , 1993, Gastroenterology.

[8]  M. Pérez-Mateo,et al.  Multicenter double-blind trial of gabexate mesylate (FOY) in unselected patients with acute pancreatitis. , 1992, Digestion.

[9]  H. Harada,et al.  Clinical trial with a protease inhibitor gabexate mesilate in acute pancreatitis , 1991, International journal of pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology.

[10]  W. Steinberg,et al.  Treatment of acute pancreatitis: Comparison of animal and human studies , 1987 .

[11]  Y. Liaw,et al.  Controlled Trial of Protease Inhibitor Gabexelate Mesilate (FOY) in the Treatment of Acute Pancreatitis , 1987, Pancreas.

[12]  N. Tanaka,et al.  Comparative clinical study of FOY and Trasylol in acute pancreatitis. , 1979, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[13]  J. C. Ferguson,et al.  A single‐centre double‐blind trial of Trasylol therapy in primary acute pancreatitis , 1978, The British journal of surgery.

[14]  DEATH FROM ACUTE PANCREATITIS M.R.C. Multicentre Trial of Glucagon and Aprotinin , 1977, The Lancet.

[15]  C. Rigby,et al.  A controlled trial of Trasylol in the treatment of acute pancreatitis , 1974, The British journal of surgery.