Monte Carlo sampling of solutions to inverse problems

Probabilistic formulation of inverse problems leads to the definition of a probability distribution in the model space. This probability distribution combines a priori information with new information obtained by measuring some observable parameters (data). As, in the general case, the theory linking data with model parameters is nonlinear, the a posteriori probability in the model space may not be easy to describe (it may be multimodal, some moments may not be defined, etc.). When analyzing an inverse problem, obtaining a maximum likelihood model is usually not sufficient, as we normally also wish to have information on the resolution power of the data. In the general case we may have a large number of model parameters, and an inspection of the marginal probability densities of interest may be impractical, or even useless. But it is possible to pseudorandomly generate a large collection of models according to the posterior probability distribution and to analyze and display the models in such a way that information on the relative likelihoods of model properties is conveyed to the spectator. This can be accomplished by means of an efficient Monte Carlo method, even in cases where no explicit formula for the a priori distribution is available. The most well known importance sampling method, the Metropolis algorithm, can be generalized, and this gives a method that allows analysis of (possibly highly nonlinear) inverse problems with complex a priori information and data with an arbitrary noise distribution.

[1]  Frank Press,et al.  Earth models obtained by Monte Carlo inversion. , 1968 .

[2]  Donald Geman,et al.  Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images , 1984 .

[3]  N. Metropolis,et al.  The Monte Carlo method. , 1949 .

[4]  G. Backus,et al.  Inference from inadequate and inaccurate data, I. , 1970, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  D. Jackson The use of a priori data to resolve non‐uniqueness in linear inversion , 1979 .

[6]  Wafik B. Beydoun,et al.  Reference velocity model estimation from prestack waveforms: Coherency optimization by simulated annealing , 1989 .

[7]  Klaus Mosegaard,et al.  A SIMULATED ANNEALING APPROACH TO SEISMIC MODEL OPTIMIZATION WITH SPARSE PRIOR INFORMATION , 1991 .

[8]  A. Tarantola,et al.  Generalized Nonlinear Inverse Problems Solved Using the Least Squares Criterion (Paper 1R1855) , 1982 .

[9]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Probabilistic Solution of Ill-Posed Problems in Computational Vision , 1987 .

[10]  C. Chapman,et al.  Automatic 1-D waveform inversion of marine seismic refraction data , 1988 .

[11]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[12]  A. Tarantola Inverse problem theory : methods for data fitting and model parameter estimation , 1987 .

[13]  G Backus Inference from Inadequate and Inaccurate Data, II. , 1970, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Daniel H. Rothman,et al.  Nonlinear inversion, statistical mechanics, and residual statics estimation , 1985 .

[15]  R. Wiggins,et al.  Monte Carlo inversion of body‐wave observations , 1969 .

[16]  LeRoy M. Dorman,et al.  The gravitational edge effect , 1975 .

[17]  J Boiden Pedersen,et al.  Variability of estimated binding parameters. , 1990, Biophysical chemistry.

[18]  V. I. Keilis-Borok,et al.  Inverse Problems of Seismology (Structural Review) , 1967 .

[19]  R. Parker Understanding Inverse Theory , 1977 .

[20]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[21]  Daniel H. Rothman,et al.  Automatic estimation of large residual statics corrections , 1986 .

[22]  Robert L. Parker,et al.  UNDERSTANDING INVERSE THEORY x10066 , 1977 .

[23]  R. Wiggins,et al.  The general linear inverse problem - Implication of surface waves and free oscillations for earth structure. , 1972 .

[24]  A. Tarantola,et al.  Monte Carlo estimation and resolution analysis of seismic background velocities , 1991 .

[25]  A.,et al.  Inverse Problems = Quest for Information , 2022 .