Agent-based optimisation of public transport supply and pricing: impacts of activity scheduling decisions and simulation randomness

The optimal setting of public transport pricing and supply levels has been traditionally analysed with analytical models that combine the objectives of users, service providers and decision makers in optimisation problems. In this paper, public transport fare and headway are jointly optimised using an activity-based simulation framework. Unlike traditional analytical models that find single optimal values for headway, fare and other optimisation variables, we obtain a range of values for the optimal fare and headway, due to the randomness in user behaviour that is inherent to an agent-based approach. Waiting times and implications of an active bus capacity constraint are obtained on an agent-by-agent basis. The maximisation of operator profit or social welfare result in different combinations of the most likely optimal headway and fare. We show that the gap between welfare and profit optimal solutions is smaller when users can adjust their departure time according to their activities, timetabling and convenience of the public transport service.

[1]  Rodrigo Fernandez,et al.  Modelling public transport stops by microscopic simulation , 2008 .

[2]  P. Schonfeld,et al.  Multiple period optimization of bus transit systems , 1991 .

[3]  Marcel Rieser,et al.  Adding Transit to an Agent-Based Transportation Simulation: Concepts and Implementation , 2010 .

[4]  Marvin Kraus,et al.  A new look at the two-mode problem , 2003 .

[5]  R. Baskaran,et al.  Simulation model to determine frequency of a single bus route with single and multiple headways , 2012, Int. J. Bus. Perform. Supply Chain Model..

[6]  H. Mohring.  Optimization and Scale Economies in Urban Bus Transportation , 1972 .

[7]  M. Kraus.  Discomfort externalities and marginal cost transit fares , 1991 .

[8]  W. Vickrey.  Congestion Theory and Transport Investment , 1969 .

[9]  W. Harrington,et al.  Transit in Washington, DC: Current benefits and optimal level of provision , 2007 .

[10]  K. Small,et al.  Should Urban Transit Subsidies Be Reduced? , 2007 .

[11]  K. Nagel,et al.  Income-contingent user preferences in policy evaluation: application and discussion based on multi-agent transport simulations , 2011 .

[12]  Ki-jung Ahn,et al.  Road Pricing and Bus Service Policies , 2009 .

[13]  Yuichiro Yoshida,et al.  The Commuter's Time-of-Use Decision and Optimal Pricing and Service in Urban Mass Transit , 2002 .

[14]  E. Pels,et al.  Infrastructure Pricing and Competition between Modes in Urban Transport , 2007 .

[15]  B. Borger,et al.  Transport externalities and optimal pricing and supply decisions in urban transportation: a simulation analysis for Belgium , 1998 .

[16]  J S Dodgson,et al.  BENEFIT-COST RULES FOR URBAN TRANSIT SUBSIDIES : AN INTEGRATION OF ALLOCATIONAL, DISTRIBUTIONAL AND PUBLIC FINANCE ISSUES , 1987 .

[17]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  High-resolution destination choice in agent-based demand models , 2011 .

[18]  Alejandro Tirachini,et al.  Public transport supply optimization in an activity-based model : Impacts of activity scheduling decisions and dynamic congestion , 2012 .

[19]  Kai Nagel,et al.  An Improved Framework for Large-Scale Multi-Agent Sim- ulations of Travel Behavior , 2004 .

[20]  D. Hensher,et al.  Multimodal Transport Pricing: First Best, Second Best and Extensions to Non-motorized Transport , 2012 .

[21]  M. Goetschalckx.  Supply Chain Models , 2011 .

[22]  R. Arnott,et al.  The Two‐Mode Problem: Second‐Best Pricing and Capacity , 2000 .

[23]  C. A. Guevara,et al.  Congestion pricing, transit subsidies and dedicated bus lanes: Efficient and practical solutions to congestion , 2011 .

[24]  J. Jansson.  A SIMPLE BUS LINE MODEL FOR OPTIMISATION OF SERVICE FREQUENCY AND BUS SIZE , 1980 .

[25]  K. Nagel,et al.  Rising car user costs: comparing aggregated and geo-spatial impacts on travel demand and air pollutant emissions , 2013 .

[26]  Alejandro Tirachini,et al.  Bus congestion, optimal infrastructure investment and the choice of a fare collection system in dedicated bus corridors , 2011 .

[27]  C. Gawron,et al.  An Iterative Algorithm to Determine the Dynamic User Equilibrium in a Traffic Simulation Model , 1998 .

[28]  Takatoshi Tabuchi,et al.  Bottleneck Congestion and Modal Split , 1993 .

[29]  K. Nagel,et al.  Generating complete all-day activity plans with genetic algorithms , 2005 .

[30]  John M. Rose,et al.  Multimodal pricing and optimal design of urban public transport: The interplay between traffic congestion and bus crowding , 2014 .

[31]  R. Oldfield,et al.  An analytic investigation of optimal bus size , 1988 .

[32]  Andreas Horni.  Variability in Transport Microsimulations Investigated for MATSim: Preliminary Results , 2011 .

[33]  Andreas Neumann,et al.  A paratransit-inspired evolutionary process for public transit network design , 2014 .

[34]  Nick Tyler,et al.  Effect of Passenger–Bus–Traffic Interactions on Bus Stop Operations , 2005 .

[35]  S. Jara-Díaz,et al.  The effect of financial constraints on the optimal design of public transport services , 2009 .

[36]  Hugo E. Silva,et al.  Efficiency and Substitutability of Transit Subsidies and Other Urban Transport Policies , 2014 .

[37]  S. Jara-Díaz,et al.  Towards a general microeconomic model for the operation of public transport , 2003 .

[38]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Variability in transport microsimulations investigated for MATSim , 2011 .

[39]  N. Cetin,et al.  A Large-Scale Agent-Based Traffic Microsimulation Based On Queue Model , 2003 .