The eyes like their targets on a stable background.

In normal human visual behavior, our visual system is continuously exposed to abrupt changes in the local contrast and mean luminance in various parts of the visual field, as caused by actual changes in the environment, as well as by movements of our body, head, and eyes. Previous research has shown that both threshold and suprathreshold contrast percepts are attenuated by a co-occurring change in the mean luminance at the location of the target stimulus. In the current study, we tested the hypothesis that contrast targets presented with a co-occurring change in local mean luminance receive fewer fixations than targets presented in a region with a steady mean luminance. To that end we performed an eye-tracking experiment involving eight observers. On each trial, after a 4 s adaptation period, an observer's task was to make a saccade to one of two target gratings, presented simultaneously at 7° eccentricity, separated by 30° in polar angle. When both targets were presented with a steady mean luminance, saccades landed mostly in the area between the two targets, signifying the classic global effect. However, when one of the targets was presented with a change in luminance, the saccade distribution was biased towards the target with the steady luminance. The results show that the attenuation of contrast signals by co-occurring, ecologically typical changes in mean luminance affects fixation selection and is therefore likely to affect eye movements in natural visual behavior.

[1]  T. Gawne,et al.  The responses of visual cortical neurons encode differences across saccades , 2003, Neuroreport.

[2]  H. Deubel,et al.  Effect of remote distractors on saccade programming: evidence for an extended fixation zone. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  Iain D Gilchrist,et al.  Oculomotor capture by transient events: a comparison of abrupt onsets, offsets, motion, and flicker. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[4]  Karl R Gegenfurtner,et al.  A functional role for trans-saccadic luminance differences. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[5]  C W Tyler,et al.  Colour bit-stealing to enhance the luminance resolution of digital displays on a single pixel basis. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[6]  Karl R Gegenfurtner,et al.  Geometry in Nature , 1993 .

[7]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  A competitive integration model of exogenous and endogenous eye movements , 2010, Biological Cybernetics.

[8]  Kuniharu Arai,et al.  A model of the saccade-generating system that accounts for trajectory variations produced by competing visual stimuli , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[9]  Branka Spehar,et al.  When do luminance changes capture attention? , 2012, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[10]  Christof Koch,et al.  A Model of Saliency-Based Visual Attention for Rapid Scene Analysis , 2009 .

[11]  M. Hayhoe,et al.  In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities? , 2001, Vision Research.

[12]  R. Baddeley,et al.  Do we look at lights? Using mixture modelling to distinguish between low- and high-level factors in natural image viewing , 2009 .

[13]  N. J. Gandhi,et al.  Order of operations for decoding superior colliculus activity for saccade generation. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Markku Kilpeläinen,et al.  Effects of Mean Luminance Changes on Human Contrast Perception: Contrast Dependence, Time-Course and Spatial Specificity , 2011, PloS one.

[15]  A. Opstal,et al.  A nonlinear model for collicular spatial interactions underlying the metrical properties of electrically elicited saccades , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[16]  S. Coren,et al.  Effect of Non-Target Stimuli upon Length of Voluntary Saccades , 1972, Perceptual and motor skills.

[17]  Robert A. Frazor,et al.  Local luminance and contrast in natural images , 2006, Vision Research.

[18]  R. Walker,et al.  A model of saccade generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[19]  E. Keller,et al.  Dependence on target configuration of express saccade-related activity in the primate superior colliculus. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Statistics of natural image categories , 2003, Network.

[21]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  M. Hayhoe,et al.  The time-course of multiplicative and subtractive adaptation process , 1987, Vision Research.

[23]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Foveated analysis of image features at fixations , 2007, Vision Research.

[24]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences , 2011, Behavior Research Methods.

[25]  Jonathan W. Peirce,et al.  PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[26]  J. Stern Theoretical and applied aspects of eye movement research A. G. Gale and F. Johnson, (Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, 1984) pp. xiii + 565, Dfl. 185 , 1985, Biological Psychology.

[27]  D. Snodderly,et al.  Saccades and drifts differentially modulate neuronal activity in V1: effects of retinal image motion, position, and extraretinal influences. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[28]  W. Wolf,et al.  The Evaluation of the Oculomotor Error Signal , 1984 .

[29]  R. Baddeley,et al.  The long and the short of it: Spatial statistics at fixation vary with saccade amplitude and task , 2006, Vision Research.

[30]  Alexander C. Schütz,et al.  Eye movements and perception: a selective review. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[31]  S. Stigchel,et al.  Averaging is not everything: The saccade global effect weakens with increasing stimulus size , 2012, Vision Research.

[32]  U. Castiello,et al.  Sudden and gradual presentation of distractor objects: differential interference effects , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  Ari Koskelainen,et al.  Light adaptation of cone photoresponses studied at the photoreceptor and ganglion cell levels in the frog retina , 1998, Vision Research.

[34]  R. Klein,et al.  A Model of Saccade Initiation Based on the Competitive Integration of Exogenous and Endogenous Signals in the Superior Colliculus , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  Lauri Nurminen,et al.  The effect of mean luminance change and grating pedestals on contrast perception: Model simulations suggest a common, retinal, origin , 2012, Vision Research.

[36]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  The spatial coding of the inhibition evoked by distractors , 2007, Vision Research.

[37]  J T Todd,et al.  Implications of a transient-sustained dichotomy for the measurement of human performance. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  J. Krauskopf,et al.  Reaction time as a measure of the temporal response properties of individua colour mechanisms. , 1973, Vision research.

[39]  D. Robinson Eye movements evoked by collicular stimulation in the alert monkey. , 1972, Vision research.

[40]  Peng Wang,et al.  An LCD Monitor with Sufficiently Precise Timing for Research in Vision , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[41]  J. V. van Hateren,et al.  Dynamics of adaptation at high luminances: adaptation is faster after luminance decrements than after luminance increments. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[42]  Sean P. MacEvoy,et al.  Macaque V1 activity during natural vision: effects of natural scenes and saccades. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[43]  K. Donner,et al.  Visual reaction time: neural conditions for the equivalence of stimulus area and contrast , 2003, Vision Research.

[44]  Fred Rieke,et al.  Review the Challenges Natural Images Pose for Visual Adaptation , 2022 .

[45]  D. E. Irwin,et al.  Our Eyes do Not Always Go Where we Want Them to Go: Capture of the Eyes by New Objects , 1998 .

[46]  D. Ballard,et al.  Eye guidance in natural vision: reinterpreting salience. , 2011, Journal of vision.