Galaxy and mass assembly (GAMA): The environmental impact on SFR and metallicity in galaxy groups
暂无分享,去创建一个
A. Hopkins | B. Holwerda | J. Liske | Á. López-Sánchez | M. Owers | K. Pimbblet | M. Lara-López | R. Pérez-Martínez | A. Pérez-García | D. Sotillo-Ramos | M. Lara-López
[1] C. Conselice,et al. Investigating the Effect of Galaxy Interactions on the Enhancement of Active Galactic Nuclei at 0.5 < z < 3.0 , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.
[2] Á. López-Sánchez,et al. A single galaxy population? Statistical evidence that the star-forming main sequence might be the tip of the iceberg , 2020, 2009.06931.
[3] Xiaohu Yang,et al. The intrinsic SFRF and sSFRF of galaxies: comparing SDSS observation with IllustrisTNG simulation , 2020, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics.
[4] P. Torrey,et al. Interacting galaxies in the IllustrisTNG simulations - I: Triggered star formation in a cosmological context , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[5] V. Debattista,et al. Tidally induced warps of spiral galaxies in IllustrisTNG , 2020, 2002.07022.
[6] A. Gallazzi,et al. Oxygen yields as a constraint on feedback processes in galaxies , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[7] M. Boquien,et al. SDSS-IV MaNGA: Spatial Evolution of Star Formation Triggered by Galaxy Interactions , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.
[8] H. Hwang,et al. Evolution of star formation rate–density relation over cosmic time in a simulated universe: the observed reversal reproduced , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[9] A. McConnachie,et al. A definitive merger-AGN connection at z ∼ 0 with CFIS: mergers have an excess of AGN and AGN hosts are more frequently disturbed , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[10] D. Goddard,et al. Both starvation and outflows drive galaxy quenching , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[11] L. Hernquist,et al. Jellyfish galaxies with the IllustrisTNG simulations – I. Gas-stripping phenomena in the full cosmological context , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[12] G. Fasano,et al. Morphology rather than environment drives the SFR–mass relation in the local universe , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[13] A. Hopkins,et al. Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA): The environmental dependence of the galaxy main sequence , 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics.
[14] O. Ilbert,et al. On the fast quenching of young low-mass galaxies up to z ∼ 0.6: new spotlight on the lead role of environment , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[15] J. Loveday,et al. Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): the effect of galaxy group environment on active galactic nuclei , 2018, 1801.03725.
[16] L. Kewley,et al. Chemical pre-processing of cluster galaxies over the past 10 billion years in the IllustrisTNG simulations , 2018, 1801.03500.
[17] Annalisa Pillepich,et al. Similar star formation rate and metallicity variability time-scales drive the fundamental metallicity relation , 2017, 1711.11039.
[18] D. Bizyaev,et al. SDSS-IV MaNGA: Spatially Resolved Star Formation Main Sequence and LI(N)ER Sequence , 2017, 1711.09162.
[19] V. Springel,et al. The evolution of the mass-metallicity relation and its scatter in IllustrisTNG , 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[20] Cca,et al. The uniformity and time-invariance of the intra-cluster metal distribution in galaxy clusters from the IllustrisTNG simulations , 2017, 1707.05318.
[21] Annalisa Pillepich,et al. First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: the stellar mass content of groups and clusters of galaxies , 2017, 1707.03406.
[22] V. Springel,et al. First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: radio haloes and magnetic fields , 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[23] Cca,et al. First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: matter and galaxy clustering , 2017, 1707.03397.
[24] G. Kauffmann,et al. First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: the galaxy colour bimodality , 2017, 1707.03395.
[25] E. Ramirez-Ruiz,et al. First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: a tale of two elements - chemical evolution of magnesium and europium , 2017, 1707.03401.
[26] M. Geller,et al. The Dependence of the Mass-Metallicity Relation on Large Scale Environment , 2017, 1702.03323.
[27] S. Borgani,et al. The history of chemical enrichment in the intracluster medium from cosmological simulations , 2017, 1701.08164.
[28] A. Hopkins,et al. Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA): active galactic nuclei in pairs of galaxies , 2016, 1611.03376.
[29] P. Hopkins,et al. MUFASA: Galaxy star formation, gas, and metal properties across cosmic time , 2016, 1610.01626.
[30] R. Bower,et al. The origin of the enhanced metallicity of satellite galaxies. , 2016, 1609.03379.
[31] M. Hudson,et al. Satellite quenching time-scales in clusters from projected phase space measurements matched to simulated orbits , 2016, 1607.07934.
[32] K. Glazebrook,et al. DIFFERENCES IN THE STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES AND STAR FORMATION RATES OF FIELD AND CLUSTER GALAXIES AT Z ∼ 1 , 2016, 1605.05314.
[33] P. Hopkins,et al. MUFASA: Galaxy Formation Simulations With Meshless Hydrodynamics , 2016, 1604.01418.
[34] J. Mohr,et al. THE EVOLUTION OF THE INTRACLUSTER MEDIUM METALLICITY IN SUNYAEV ZEL’DOVICH-SELECTED GALAXY CLUSTERS AT 0 < z < 1.5 , 2016, 1603.03035.
[35] S. Genel. HOW ENVIRONMENT AFFECTS GALAXY METALLICITY THROUGH STRIPPING AND FORMATION HISTORY: LESSONS FROM THE ILLUSTRIS SIMULATION , 2016, 1602.02773.
[36] R. Bower,et al. The EAGLE simulations of galaxy formation: the importance of the hydrodynamics scheme , 2015, 1509.05056.
[37] A. Robotham,et al. Hyper-Fit: Fitting Linear Models to Multidimensional Data with Multivariate Gaussian Uncertainties , 2015, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia.
[38] J. Loveday,et al. Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): the effect of close interactions on star formation in galaxies , 2015, 1507.04447.
[39] J. A. Vázquez-Mata,et al. Galaxy and mass assembly (GAMA): End of survey report and data release 2 , 2015, 1506.08222.
[40] R. Maiolino,et al. Strangulation as the primary mechanism for shutting down star formation in galaxies , 2015, Nature.
[41] A. Finoguenov,et al. LoCuSS: THE SLOW QUENCHING OF STAR FORMATION IN CLUSTER GALAXIES AND THE NEED FOR PRE-PROCESSING , 2015, 1504.05604.
[42] P. Torrey,et al. Galaxy pairs in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey – X. Does gas content alter star formation rate enhancement in galaxy interactions? , 2015, 1503.05194.
[43] C. Frenk,et al. Evolution of galaxy stellar masses and star formation rates in the eagle simulations , 2014, 1410.3485.
[44] Institute for Astronomy,et al. METAL DEFICIENCY IN CLUSTER STAR-FORMING GALAXIES AT Z = 2 , 2014, 1410.1437.
[45] J. A. Vázquez-Mata,et al. Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): the dependence of the galaxy luminosity function on environment, redshift and colour , 2014, 1409.4681.
[46] Ichi Tanaka,et al. An early phase of environmental effects on galaxy properties unveiled by near-infrared spectroscopy of protocluster galaxies at z > 2 , 2014, 1406.5219.
[47] R. Maiolino,et al. From haloes to Galaxies – I. The dynamics of the gas regulator model and the implied cosmic sSFR history , 2014, 1402.5964.
[48] O. I. Wong,et al. The green valley is a red herring: Galaxy Zoo reveals two evolutionary pathways towards quenching of star formation in early-and late-type galaxies , 2014, 1402.4814.
[49] K. Hess,et al. EVOLUTION IN THE H i GAS CONTENT OF GALAXY GROUPS: PRE-PROCESSING AND MASS ASSEMBLY IN THE CURRENT EPOCH , 2013, 1308.4646.
[50] C. Steidel,et al. THE MASS–METALLICITY RELATION OF A z ∼ 2 PROTOCLUSTER WITH MOSFIRE , 2013, 1306.6334.
[51] E. Grebel,et al. The metallicity-redshift relations for emission-line SDSS galaxies: examination of the dependence on the star formation rate , 2013 .
[52] A. Hopkins,et al. Galaxy and mass assembly (GAMA): A deeper view of the mass, metallicity and SFR relationships , 2013, 1306.1583.
[53] Australian National University,et al. Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): Spectroscopic analysis , 2013, 1301.7127.
[54] P. Torrey,et al. Galaxy pairs in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey – V. Tracing changes in star formation rate and metallicity out to separations of 80 kpc , 2012, 1207.4791.
[55] Durham,et al. Lightcone mock catalogues from semi-analytic models of galaxy formation – I. Construction and application to the BzK colour selection , 2012, 1206.4049.
[56] J. Tinker,et al. Galaxy evolution in groups and clusters: satellite star formation histories and quenching time-scales in a hierarchical Universe , 2012, 1206.3571.
[57] S. Bamford,et al. Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): galaxy environments and star formation rate variations , 2012, 1205.3368.
[58] G. Fasano,et al. The distribution of galaxy morphological types and the morphology–mass relation in different environments at low redshift , 2011, 1110.0802.
[59] C. Conselice,et al. Measures of Galaxy Environment I - What is "Environment"? , 2011, 1109.6328.
[60] S. Bamford,et al. Galaxy And Mass Assembly: Stellar Mass Estimates , 2011, 1108.0635.
[61] A. Koekemoer,et al. GALAXY STRUCTURE AND MODE OF STAR FORMATION IN THE SFR–MASS PLANE FROM z ∼ 2.5 TO z ∼ 0.1 , 2011, 1107.0317.
[62] M. Carollo,et al. MASS AND ENVIRONMENT AS DRIVERS OF GALAXY EVOLUTION. II. THE QUENCHING OF SATELLITE GALAXIES AS THE ORIGIN OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS , 2011, 1106.2546.
[63] S. Bamford,et al. Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA): the GAMA galaxy group catalogue (G3Cv1) , 2011, 1106.1994.
[64] S. Bamford,et al. Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA): the star formation rate dependence of the stellar initial mass function , 2011, 1104.2379.
[65] T. Thuan,et al. GALAXY DOWNSIZING AND THE REDSHIFT EVOLUTION OF OXYGEN AND NITROGEN ABUNDANCES: ORIGIN OF THE SCATTER IN THE N/H–O/H DIAGRAM , 2010, 1012.1148.
[66] S. Bamford,et al. Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA): survey diagnostics and core data release , 2010, 1009.0614.
[67] Á. Bongiovanni,et al. Study of star-forming galaxies in SDSS up to redshift 0.4 II. Evolution from the fundamental parameters: mass, metallicity & SFR , 2010, 1003.5475.
[68] B. Garilli,et al. MASS AND ENVIRONMENT AS DRIVERS OF GALAXY EVOLUTION IN SDSS AND zCOSMOS AND THE ORIGIN OF THE SCHECHTER FUNCTION , 2010, 1003.4747.
[69] Austria,et al. The origin of the mass-metallicity relation: an analytical approach , 2010, 1001.4374.
[70] Astronomy,et al. COMPARING THE RELATION BETWEEN STAR FORMATION AND GALAXY MASS IN DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTS , 2009, 0912.1180.
[71] S. Dye,et al. Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): the input catalogue and star–galaxy separation , 2009, 0910.5120.
[72] V. Wild,et al. Star formation and AGN activity in SDSS cluster galaxies , 2009, 0909.3522.
[73] A. McConnachie,et al. The mass–metallicity relation in galaxy clusters: the relative importance of cluster membership versus local environment , 2009, 0903.4684.
[74] K. Abazajian,et al. THE SEVENTH DATA RELEASE OF THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY , 2008, 0812.0649.
[75] A. McConnachie,et al. GALAXY PAIRS IN THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY. I. STAR FORMATION, ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEUS FRACTION, AND THE LUMINOSITY/MASS–METALLICITY RELATION , 2008, 0803.0161.
[76] L. Kewley,et al. Metallicity Calibrations and the Mass-Metallicity Relation for Star-forming Galaxies , 2008, 0801.1849.
[77] R. Davé,et al. The origin of the galaxy mass-metallicity relation and implications for galactic outflows , 2007, 0704.3100.
[78] M. Geller,et al. Minor Galaxy Interactions: Star Formation Rates and Galaxy Properties , 2007, astro-ph/0703729.
[79] D. Lambas,et al. Active Galactic Nuclei and Galaxy Interactions , 2007 .
[80] S. Bamford,et al. The sizes of disc galaxies in intermediate-redshift clusters , 2007, astro-ph/0702709.
[81] S. Maddox,et al. zCOSMOS: A Large VLT/VIMOS Redshift Survey Covering 0 < z < 3 in the COSMOS Field , 2006, astro-ph/0612291.
[82] G. Stinson,et al. The Origin and Evolution of the Mass-Metallicity Relationship for Galaxies: Results from Cosmological N-Body Simulations , 2006, astro-ph/0609620.
[83] S. Bamford,et al. Galaxy bimodality versus stellar mass and environment , 2006, astro-ph/0607648.
[84] M. Bureau,et al. The SAURON project - V. Integral-field emission-line kinematics of 48 elliptical and lenticular galaxies , 2005, astro-ph/0511307.
[85] L. Kewley,et al. Metallicity and Nuclear Star Formation in Nearby Galaxy Pairs: Evidence for Tidally Induced Gas Flows , 2005, astro-ph/0511119.
[86] P. Hopkins,et al. A Unified, Merger-driven Model of the Origin of Starbursts, Quasars, the Cosmic X-Ray Background, Supermassive Black Holes, and Galaxy Spheroids , 2005, astro-ph/0506398.
[87] T. D. Matteo,et al. Energy input from quasars regulates the growth and activity of black holes and their host galaxies , 2005, Nature.
[88] R. Bouwens,et al. The Morphology-Density Relation in z ~ 1 Clusters , 2005, astro-ph/0501224.
[89] University of Chicago,et al. The ultimate halo mass in a ΛCDM universe , 2004, astro-ph/0412161.
[90] C. Baugh,et al. Where are the stars , 2004, astro-ph/0412049.
[91] P. Alexander,et al. Star formation in close pairs selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2004, astro-ph/0407289.
[92] J. Brinkmann,et al. The Origin of the Mass-Metallicity Relation: Insights from 53,000 Star-forming Galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2004, astro-ph/0405537.
[93] M. Pettini,et al. [O III] / [N II] as an abundance indicator at high redshift , 2004, astro-ph/0401128.
[94] Timothy M. Heckman,et al. The host galaxies of active galactic nuclei , 2003 .
[95] Chisato Yamauchi,et al. The morphology–density relation in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2003, astro-ph/0312043.
[96] G. Bruzual,et al. Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003 , 2003, astro-ph/0309134.
[97] D. Lambas,et al. Galaxy pairs in the 2dF survey — I. Effects of interactions on star formation in the field , 2002, astro-ph/0212222.
[98] D. Madgwick,et al. The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: The environmental dependence of galaxy star formation rates near clusters , 2002, astro-ph/0203336.
[99] L. Kewley,et al. Theoretical Modeling of Starburst Galaxies , 2001, astro-ph/0106324.
[100] Walter A. Siegmund,et al. The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary , 2000, astro-ph/0006396.
[101] M. Geller,et al. Tidally Triggered Star Formation in Close Pairs of Galaxies , 1999, astro-ph/9909217.
[102] Alan Dressler,et al. The Star Formation Histories of Galaxies in Distant Clusters , 1999, astro-ph/9901264.
[103] R. Carlberg,et al. Star Formation in Cluster Galaxies at 0.2 < z < 0.55 , 1997, astro-ph/9707339.
[104] Jr.,et al. Evolution since z = 0.5 of the Morphology-Density Relation for Clusters of Galaxies , 1997, astro-ph/9707232.
[105] G. Lake,et al. Galaxy harassment and the evolution of clusters of galaxies , 1995, Nature.
[106] J. Mathis,et al. The relationship between infrared, optical, and ultraviolet extinction , 1989 .
[107] M. Postman,et al. The morphology-density relation - The group connection , 1984 .
[108] A. Dressler. Galaxy morphology in rich clusters: Implications for the formation and evolution of galaxies , 1980 .
[110] J. Baldwin,et al. ERRATUM - CLASSIFICATION PARAMETERS FOR THE EMISSION-LINE SPECTRA OF EXTRAGALACTIC OBJECTS , 1981 .
[111] J. Gunn,et al. On the Infall of Matter into Clusters of Galaxies and Some Effects on Their Evolution , 1972 .